This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2016/mar/01/cardinal-george-pell-testifies-to-child-sexual-abuse-royal-commission-from-rome-day-two-live

The article has changed 13 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 6 Version 7
Cardinal George Pell testifies to child sexual abuse royal commission from Rome, day two – live Cardinal George Pell testifies to child sexual abuse royal commission from Rome, day two – live
(35 minutes later)
12.54am GMT
00:54
Elle Hunt
Emily Bryan, the ABC’s coordinating producer based in London, has quoted a NSW priest in Rome on Pell. She reports that he says that the Cardinal is answering truthfully, and that abuse cover-ups “wouldn’t happen now”.
A NSW priest in Rome says #Pell is answering truthfully, and abuse cover-ups "wouldn't happen now." Says context of era important. @abcnews
The sentiment was echoed by young priests quoted by Bryan’s colleague Lisa Millar, the London bureau chief for ABC.
Just spoke to some young priests who are here to support Cardinal Pell and 'learn'. They say abuse of 70s would not happen now in church
Millar has described the survivors coming and going from the hearing room.
Every now and then a survivor leaves #Pell Rome hearing room, then returns. They seem spellbound by what they're hearing. Watching intensely
She said earlier that there were 75 people in the hearing room at the Hotel Quirinale, with the front four rows still full of survivor groups from Australia.
Headcount in Rome - 75 left in hotel hearing room. Lots of empty chairs. Front 4 rows still full with survivor groups from Oz #pell
Meanwhile, Pell and the Ballarat abuse survivors were covered in a half-page story in the Italian newspaper La Repubblica today. The headline says, ‘From Australia to Rome: ‘We the victims of abuse are here to see Pell’.
George #Pell and Ballarat abuse survivors are making news in Rome. Half-page story in La Repubblica today. @abcnews pic.twitter.com/JjZisbTlCE
12.47am GMT
00:47
Justice McClellan and counsel assisting, Gail Furness, continue to press Pell on what was said at a meeting of consultors about Gerald Ridsdale’s abusing of children, and the reasons why it was decided at that meeting to move Ridsdale for a sixth time to another parish.
We now know Ridsdale was moved because he was abusing children, and that most of the consultors at the meeting knew that was the reason. But Pell maintains he did not know why Ridsdale was being moved to another parish, though he was present at the meeting.
McClellan; “You, as a responsible consultor, would want to know, you would be very concerned to know whether or not the reason [for moving Gerald Risdale to a new parish] was because Ridsdale’s activities had become a matter of public scandal, wouldn’t you?”
Pell: “I would have been much more - it would have been important to know whether the public scandal touched on underage sexual activity or the public scandal was of another nature, say drinking or quarrelling or adult sexual activity.
McClellan: “Whatever it was,public scandal brings real problems for the church, doesn’t it?”
Pell: “Yes, it does.”
Furness: “I think where we’re up to, Cardinal, is that you don’t have any recollection of what was said at the meeting, although you have a recollection of what was not said, is that fair?”
Pell: “I have studied the minutes of this meeting that took place over 30 years ago and, in the light of those minutes, I am quite happy to accept them.”
Furness: “That was not my question, I will repeat it. You do not have any recollection of what was said at the meeting although you have a recollection of what was not said, is that right?”
Pell: “I wonder whether that is misleading. In the independent of the minutes, I do know the basis on which we proceeded. That was that when a priest could be shifted for non-criminal activities and the reasons would not necessarily be given.”
12.41am GMT
00:41
People in Ballarat Town Hall getting increasingly frustrated. Open heckling going on, a couple have walked out #CARoyalComm
12.34am GMT
00:34
Justice Peter McClellan; “To your knowledge, there are many priests who have engaged in sexual activity, aren’t there?”
Pell: “Too many.”
12.31am GMT
00:31
Furness is growing impatient with Pell.
Furness: “You now recall that the bishop at that meeting said that [paedophile priest] Father Ridsdale was open and available for an appropriate transfer or promotion? Do you now remember that was said at the meeting?”
Pell: “Short of consulting the minutes, I don’t.”
Furness: “Consult the minutes, they are in front of you.”
Updated
at 12.45am GMT
12.28am GMT
00:28
Furness: I suggest that you failed in your responsibility as a consultor.
Continuing from the post below, Pell says he can not recall why, at a meeting of consultors in 1982 at which he was present, it was decided that Gerald Ridsdale, needed to be moved for a sixth time to another parish.
But he does recall homosexuality was mentioned, but paedophilia was not, he tells the commission. Ridsdale committed more than 100 offences against children as young as four, and is now in jail.
Furness: “You can’t recall what was said at the meeting, other than to recall that paedophilia wasn’t said at the meeting, is that your evidence?”
Pell: “That is, in terms of the reasons that were given for his being shifted and that recollection is reinforced by the fact that he has been proposed for a job which has some prestige. That is incompatible with, in my mind, with somebody with a string of awful offences. I knew nothing of his paedophilia.”
Furness: “Did you say to the bishop; ‘Why is it that his unusual number of appointments are continuing? Why are we moving him yet again?’. I suggest that you failed in your responsibility as a consultor, if, as your evidence is, you knew nothing about Ridsdale and you didn’t inquire. Do you accept that failure?
Pell: “I never suggested that I knew nothing. I have never suggested that I knew nothing about Ridsdale. I have never suggested that I didn’t inquire generally.”
Updated
at 12.48am GMT
12.20am GMT
00:20
Furness says it is "implausible" Pell did not know Gerald Ridsdale was abusing children
By the time a consultors meeting was held in 1982 [Pell was a consultor], the bishop of Ballarat Ronald Mulkearns, and a senior cleric, Monsignor Leo Fiscalini, knew Father Gerald Ridsdale was abusing children and a large number of complaints had been made against him. Ridsdale had been moved between five parishes by this time rather than being reported to police, the commission hears.
Pell was present at the meeting, minutes tendered to the commission show. At that meeting, it was decided Ridsdale had to be moved once again.
Furness tells Pell: “I suggest that it is implausible that those others, consultors at that meeting, including yourself, were not told why it had become necessary?”
Pell: “It would only be implausible if there was evidence that they had been told in some way or other.”
Furness: “I suggest that it is implausible, given the knowledge of three of those consultors, given the conduct of Ridsdale and the wording of those minutes that the consultors, including you, did not know why it had become necessary for him to be moved?”
Pell: “That is a complete nonsense.”
Updated
at 12.21am GMT
12.12am GMT12.12am GMT
00:1200:12
Pell is saying his role as principal of the Institute of Catholic education in the early 1980s was a legitimate reason that he was not aware of widespread rumours that Father Gerald Ridsdale was abusing children. Pell is saying his role as principal of the Institute of Catholic Education in the early 1980s was a legitimate reason that he was not aware of widespread rumours that Father Gerald Ridsdale was abusing children.
Chair or the royal commission, Justice Peter McClellan, questions Pell about this. Pell was still living in Ballarat at the time. The chair of the royal commission, Justice Peter McClellan, questions Pell about this. Pell was still living in Ballarat at the time.
McClellan; “Do you think that given the nature of the allegations and given the number of people that we can assume have knowledge of them, including senior church people, do you think it might be surprising that you didn’t hear any rumour at all?”McClellan; “Do you think that given the nature of the allegations and given the number of people that we can assume have knowledge of them, including senior church people, do you think it might be surprising that you didn’t hear any rumour at all?”
Pell: “Not necessarily, given the work I was doing. I wasn’t working full-time in the diocese. I was very much involved in the world of tertiary education.”Pell: “Not necessarily, given the work I was doing. I wasn’t working full-time in the diocese. I was very much involved in the world of tertiary education.”
McClellan: “Where were you living?”McClellan: “Where were you living?”
Pell: “With Bishop O’Collins” [in the house of St Alipius in Ballarat East].Pell: “With Bishop O’Collins” [in the house of St Alipius in Ballarat East].
McClellan: “Were you saying mass regularly on Sundays?”McClellan: “Were you saying mass regularly on Sundays?”
Pell: “I was at Ballarat East.”Pell: “I was at Ballarat East.”
McClellan: “That was every Sunday, was it?”McClellan: “That was every Sunday, was it?”
Pell: “Yes.”Pell: “Yes.”
McClellan: “I assume three times a day, would that be right?”McClellan: “I assume three times a day, would that be right?”
Pell: “Three times a Sunday, generally.”Pell: “Three times a Sunday, generally.”
McClellan: “No doubt, before and after the mass, you would speak to members of the congregations, would that be right?”McClellan: “No doubt, before and after the mass, you would speak to members of the congregations, would that be right?”
Pell: “When that was possible,that was my - that was certainly my practice.” Pell: “When that was possible, that was my that was certainly my practice.”
UpdatedUpdated
at 12.12am GMT at 12.54am GMT
12.02am GMT12.02am GMT
00:0200:02
Furness is turning her attention to Pell’s cousin, Father Henry Nolan. Nolan, who was vicar general at the time, took action immediately upon realising a 14 year-old boy was being made to sleep in the same room as notorious pedophile priest, Gerald Ridsdale. Furness is turning her attention to Pell’s cousin, Father Henry Nolan. Nolan, who was vicar general at the time, took action immediately upon realising a 14-year-old boy was being made to sleep in the same room as notorious pedophile priest, Gerald Ridsdale.
Nolan demanded the child be removed, Furness said, despite not having direct authority over the Mortlake parish.Nolan demanded the child be removed, Furness said, despite not having direct authority over the Mortlake parish.
Furness: “That is an example, isn’t it, of a priest who didn’t have structural responsibility of taking a responsible course of action and having the child removed?”Furness: “That is an example, isn’t it, of a priest who didn’t have structural responsibility of taking a responsible course of action and having the child removed?”
Pell: “He was vicar general at that stage but what he did was excellent.Pell: “He was vicar general at that stage but what he did was excellent.
Furness: “What he did was available to any priest, I suggest to you, to demand action be taken to protect children.”Furness: “What he did was available to any priest, I suggest to you, to demand action be taken to protect children.”
Updated
at 12.54am GMT
11.53pm GMT11.53pm GMT
23:5323:53
Pell: I can’t nominate another bishop whose actions are so grave and inexplicablePell: I can’t nominate another bishop whose actions are so grave and inexplicable
The bishop of Ballarat between 1971 and 1997, Ronald Mulkearns, behaved reprehensibly towards victims of child sexual abuse and their concerned parents, Cardinal George Pell has told the commission. The commission heard that in reaction to one parent who came to him to say her children were being abused, Mulkearns “just stared”.The bishop of Ballarat between 1971 and 1997, Ronald Mulkearns, behaved reprehensibly towards victims of child sexual abuse and their concerned parents, Cardinal George Pell has told the commission. The commission heard that in reaction to one parent who came to him to say her children were being abused, Mulkearns “just stared”.
Furness asks Pell: “Do you think Bishop Mulkearns is just one bad apple, as it were, within the Catholic church as a bishop by conducting himself in the way that he has up until this date?”Furness asks Pell: “Do you think Bishop Mulkearns is just one bad apple, as it were, within the Catholic church as a bishop by conducting himself in the way that he has up until this date?”
Pell: “Unfortunately, I would have to say that I can’t nominate another bishop whose actions are so grave and inexplicable. There might be some but they don’t come to mind. His repeated refusal to act is, I think, absolutely extraordinary.”Pell: “Unfortunately, I would have to say that I can’t nominate another bishop whose actions are so grave and inexplicable. There might be some but they don’t come to mind. His repeated refusal to act is, I think, absolutely extraordinary.”
UpdatedUpdated
at 11.57pm GMTat 11.57pm GMT
11.47pm GMT11.47pm GMT
23:4723:47
Furness is taking Pell through the various abuses Gerald Ridsdale inflicted on children in Mortlake. She’s also taking him through the numerous people who knew a 14 year-old boy, Paul Levey, was living with Ridsdale. She’s also presenting him with documents that details complaints made about Ridsdale. Pell maintains he was unaware of all of this.Furness is taking Pell through the various abuses Gerald Ridsdale inflicted on children in Mortlake. She’s also taking him through the numerous people who knew a 14 year-old boy, Paul Levey, was living with Ridsdale. She’s also presenting him with documents that details complaints made about Ridsdale. Pell maintains he was unaware of all of this.
Furness: “You will see that [a parent] BAI rang the family doctor and asked him what he could tell about people who molested children. She doesn’t recall if she named Ridsdale but he was the only priest in Mortlake.Furness: “You will see that [a parent] BAI rang the family doctor and asked him what he could tell about people who molested children. She doesn’t recall if she named Ridsdale but he was the only priest in Mortlake.
“Again, stopping there, we have now at this stage in Mortlake the family doctor being aware there was a problem with Ridsdale, a number of people knowing that there was a boy living in the presbytery with Ridsdale and Father Finnigan being aware that one set of parents was concerned about the welfare of their child around Ridsdale. Do you agree with that?”“Again, stopping there, we have now at this stage in Mortlake the family doctor being aware there was a problem with Ridsdale, a number of people knowing that there was a boy living in the presbytery with Ridsdale and Father Finnigan being aware that one set of parents was concerned about the welfare of their child around Ridsdale. Do you agree with that?”
Pell: “I do.”Pell: “I do.”
Furness: “It is getting close to common knowledge, isn’t it?”Furness: “It is getting close to common knowledge, isn’t it?”
Pell: “Certainly those people knew. Could I just repeat something I have said partially before. Some time around 1980, I became principal of the institute of Catholic education which had 2000 students in Ballarat and Melbourne. It is not a small job. I was in Melbourne at least a couple of times a week, so I certainly wasn’t in with the life of the diocese like someone who would be working full-time in parishes.”Pell: “Certainly those people knew. Could I just repeat something I have said partially before. Some time around 1980, I became principal of the institute of Catholic education which had 2000 students in Ballarat and Melbourne. It is not a small job. I was in Melbourne at least a couple of times a week, so I certainly wasn’t in with the life of the diocese like someone who would be working full-time in parishes.”
Furness ignores this disclaimer, and continues with her questioning.Furness ignores this disclaimer, and continues with her questioning.
UpdatedUpdated
at 11.48pm GMTat 11.48pm GMT
11.31pm GMT
23:31
'Cardinal, do you accept any responsibility at all?'
Gail Furness asks Cardinal Pell if accepts any responsibility for paedophile priest Gerald Ridsdale being moved from parish to parish rather than reported to police.
Pell responds: “No, I do not.”
#Pell says he did nothing wrong. End of story. Says he accepts no responsibility at all. #CARoyalComm @theheraldsun pic.twitter.com/WKwbAdXIVt
Updated
at 11.46pm GMT
11.26pm GMT
23:26
Furness: “It was more than just leadership, wasn’t it? It was all parish priests, assistant priests, advisers, consultors, who all collectively failed to protect children who were living and under the care of the Church in that diocese in the ‘70s and ‘80s?”
Pell: “I think that is a vast and misleading overstatement. It goes far beyond any evidence where there is evidence that people knew of misbehaviour or they knew of a practical danger they should have acted. We are not permitted to go beyond the evidence.”
Furness: “Well, there’s evidence, isn’t there, that more than one parish priest knew of allegations against Ridsdale?”
Pell: “That is correct”.
"Where people knew they should have acted," says #Pell. True again. #CARoyalComm
Updated
at 11.32pm GMT
11.23pm GMT
23:23
'You don’t need a magic wand. You just need a group of adults who are responsible, don’t you?'
Furness is turning Pell to a statement from an abuse survivor, Paul Levey. Paul is at the commission hearing in Rome watching Pell give his evidence.
Paul Levey is one of the abuse survivors from Ballarat now in Rome to watch Pell give his evidence. pic.twitter.com/9u7omIKwD4
Furness tells Pell that Levey was “sexually abused all the time just about every day” at the Mortlake parish.
Furness: “He describes he always slept in paedophile priest Gerald Ridsdale’s room and there was a housekeeper and always people coming and going, including people having parish meetings at the presbytery. And then he refers to living at the presbytery in Mortlake.”
Pell: “I was director of the Aquinas campus and at that stage, I was principal of the entire institute of Catholic education.”
Furness: “If you had discovered that a 14-year-old child was living in a presbytery, you would have done what you could to take the child out, wouldn’t you?
Pell: “Well, before that I would certainly have wanted to know why the child was there, and what precautions were in place and whether this was something that was temporary or permanent.”
Furness: “Now, if you had known that there had been complaints about Ridsdale of a sexual nature before the child was placed in the presbytery, you would never have put that child there, would you?”
Pell: “Certainly not.”
Furness: “And once you had discovered that the child was there, it would be wrong to do anything other than take the child out. Isn’t that right?”
Pell: “That recommendation that the child be taken out if it wasn’t in my power to do so.”
Furness: “You would do more than recommend, Cardinal, wouldn’t you?”
Pell: “I would do whatever was in my power in such hypothetical situations. I think we are all surrounded by real constraints and sometimes we’re able to say this must be done, sometimes we’re able to ensure that it is done. Sometimes such a recommendation would be rejected and you would have to appeal to another party. Because something is wrong you can’t wave a magic wand and correct the situation easily in every situation.”
Furness: “We’re talking about the safety of children, Cardinal. You don’t need a magic wand. You just need a group of adults who are responsible, don’t you?”
Updated
at 11.51pm GMT
11.14pm GMT
23:14
Furness is going back to comments made by Pell that his first inclination back in the 1970s would be to accept the word of the priest who denied an allegation of child sexual abuse, rather than to believe a victim.
Pell confirms: “I would have said my first instinct would have been to accept the protestation of innocence – innocence from the priest, until it was disproven. But that I, especially [from] my experience as a bishop, I came to see this was quite unreliable criteria.
Furness: My recollection certainly, Cardinal, is that you put forward a period of time up to the mid-to late 80s as when these views were views held by the Church.
Pell: “Well, I wouldn’t have described them as views held [by] the church. I would have been talking about my view and the view of a number of the other priests. I certainly acknowledge that from the middle 80s we got much greater clarity on these things. But all along there was – there should have been a presumption that we went with the truth. Your starting point might have been – or is different now. But the obligation to truth is exactly the same.”
Updated
at 11.52pm GMT
11.03pm GMT
23:03
The commission resumes
We’re back following the morning adjournment.
Questioning about notorious paedophile priest Gerald Ridsdale is continuing. Ridsdale is now in jail, having committed hundreds of offences against children. By the time Pell says he became aware of Ridsdale’s abusing, in the 1990s, Pell was no longer working alongside him.
By then, Pell says, Ridsdale had “significant dementia”.
“The poor man ... after a couple of years he couldn’t even remember what job he had. So it was – it went from significant dementia to radical, radical dementia over the two or three years I was with him. So it was difficult to say I had a coherent conversation with him.”
Updated
at 11.53pm GMT
10.57pm GMT
22:57
Leonie Sheedy, head of the Care Leavers Australia Network for child sexual abuse survivors, says she found Pell’s evidence this morning “disgraceful”.
“Saying that priests were removed from parishes because they were restless? I was just so shocked,” she says.
Pell’s comments that abuse allegations “wasn’t of much interest” to him were distressing, Sheedy said.
“It just shows the lack of empathy and understanding. The audience were just... just gobsmacked. We were shocked.”
She praised Furness and McClellan for their thorough line of questioning.
Victims not happy with #Pell evidence, one wants @Pontifex to intervene. They will have more to say at the end of #CARoyalComm hearing.
Updated
at 11.06pm GMT
10.47pm GMT
22:47
Some reactions to an explosive morning of evidence.
Mulkearns and Fiscalini thrown under the bus. #Pell was "deceived"! #royalcommission #CARoyalComm
Pell's throwing everyone else under the bus and taking no responsibility on himself #CARoyalComm
McClellan: Are you saying to this commission that between 1977 and 1979 you knew nothing about Ridsdale's offending?Pell: yes
#CARoyalComm #Pell 'there wasn't social media at that time" So ppl don't talk in a small town of 8,000 ? Over two years?
Cardinal #Pell says he was deceived by bishops & priests, didnt know of Ridsdale abuse until after he was convicted. For more @7NewsSydney
Updated
at 10.59pm GMT
10.39pm GMT
22:39
Morning adjournment
The commission is taking a short break after an extraordinary morning of evidence from Cardinal George Pell. To recap;
Melissa Davey with you here. You can share your thoughts with me on Twitter or on Facebook, and I’ll do my best to answer any of your questions.
Updated
at 11.00pm GMT
10.33pm GMT
22:33
Counsel assisting, Gail Furness, is not letting Pell off on his comments that he did share in the widespread knowledge that Gerald Ridsdale was abusing children within Ballarat parishes. Especially given he was a link between the parish and senior figures in his role as consultor.
Furness is trying to understand how that was the case Pell did not know. Her line of questioning is clearly frustrating Pell, who is growing impatient and who encouraged Furness to read her documents.
Furness: “And in your own language, you were the essential link between the bishop and the parents,teacher, children and principals of Catholic schools?”
Pell: “I find that an extraordinary claim in the light of the discussion that we had yesterday where we did a detailed study of the passage where it was pointed out very clearly that the Episcopal Vicar was one part of an essential linking between the bishop and the educational institutions and that linkage was a religious linkage.”
Furness: “Ultimately, it will be a matter for commissioners as to decide the meaning of your words in that document,Cardinal. Can I turn now to-
Pell: Could I suggest that for both of us the obligation is to study the words in the document and to conclude from that?”
Furness: “Thank you, Cardinal. I suspect some lawyers have an understanding of that concept.”
'Thank you, Cardinal. I suspect some lawyers have an understanding of that concept.' Ouch. #CARoyalComm
Big slap from Ms Furness...and thoroughly deserved. #Pell #CARoyalComm
Updated
at 10.43pm GMT
10.23pm GMT
22:23
McClellan: 'We have to determine a very serious issue'
Justice Peter McClellan is interrogating Pell on why senior figures in the church would have known that Gerald Ridsdale, who committed more than 130 offences against children as young as four between the 1960s and 1980s, would have known about his abuse while Pell did not.
McClellan says; “I don’t understand why the bishop would choose to deceive you or lie to you, a member of his consultors, about Ridsdale’s behaviour when it was common knowledge in at least two of the parishes. Given that it was common knowledge amongst many people why would he choose to deceive you?”
Pell: “Because he would realise that I didn’t know and he did not want me to share in his culpability and also I think he would not have wanted to mention it to me and some – at least some other members of the consultors because we were – at the very minimum we would have asked questions about the propriety of such a practice.”
McClellan: “What is wrong with that? That was your job, wasn’t it?”
Pell: “I’m trying to explain why he didn’t do it. Of course it was our job and almost certainly it would have been done.”
McClellan: “You say you speak of the bishop’s culpability. If we were to come to the view that you did know, you would be culpable too, wouldn’t you?”
Pell: “That’s correct.”
McClellan: So we have – we have to determine a very serious issue, don’t we?”
Updated
at 11.02pm GMT