This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jun/08/david-cameron-u-turn-britains-eu-membership-referendum

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
EU referendum: David Cameron clarifies his clarification on EU referendum EU referendum: David Cameron clarifies his clarification on EU referendum
(about 1 hour later)
David Cameron’s approach to the EU referendum campaign was in danger of slipping from confusion to farce when he clarified his position by saying he could not yet decide if ministers will be free to campaign as they wish during the planned European referendum campaign. David Cameron’s approach to the EU referendum was in danger of slipping from confusion to farce when he clarified his position by saying he had not yet decided if ministers will be free to campaign as they wish.
But he insisted the British government will have a view on the outcome of the negotiations on the terms of British membership and will not be a by-stander. But the prime minister insisted the government will have a view on the outcome of any negotiations on the terms of British membership and will not be a bystander when the referendum campaign is in full swing.
The prime minister had been widely reported as proposing to impose collective ministerial responsibility during the referendum following a briefing he gave on Sunday, but Cameron said he had been misinterpreted, and blamed reporters accompanying him at the G7 summit in Bavaria for misunderstanding him. Cameron had been widely reported as planning to impose collective ministerial responsibility during the campaign following a briefing he gave to reporters at the G7 on Sunday. But the prime minister later said he had been misinterpreted, and blamed reporters accompanying him at the summit in Bavaria for misunderstanding him.
He said collective ministerial responsibility only applies to the current stage of the renegotiations, but no decision had been made on whether ministers will be free to campaign to stay in or leave during the referendum campaign. He said ministers are currently required, as part of being in government, to expect a successful outcome to EU negotiations. The prime minister’s initial remarks on Sunday caused some surprise in Westminster where at least one member of the cabinet said in private that he had made a mistake which was bound to be corrected.
But the government initially appeared to see no need for a clarification. James Wharton, the junior communities minister who sought to introduce a private member’s bill in the last parliament for an EU referendum, was despatched onto the airwaves on Monday morning to defend the prime minister.
A few hours later, at the G7 summit, the prime minister said he had been misinterpreted as he explained that collective ministerial responsibility only applies to the current stage of the renegotiations.
No decision had been made on whether ministers will be free to campaign to stay in or leave during the referendum campaign. He said ministers are currently required as part of being in government to expect a successful outcome to EU negotiations.
Related: The great David Cameron EU referendum U-turn – how it happened
Cameron’s closing press conference at the end of the summit was dominated by questions on his approach to ministerial responsibility during the referendum campaign, and he will be frustrated that his first appearance on the world stage since his re-election largely saw him answering questions on how he is to prevent his party fracturing on whether the UK should remain a member of the European Union.Cameron’s closing press conference at the end of the summit was dominated by questions on his approach to ministerial responsibility during the referendum campaign, and he will be frustrated that his first appearance on the world stage since his re-election largely saw him answering questions on how he is to prevent his party fracturing on whether the UK should remain a member of the European Union.
He said he only realised his remarks had been misinterpreted when he read the newspapers this morning, and his officials denied he had been forced into a hasty u-turn by an angry reaction to the newspaper reports in London from senior Conservative figures such as former chief whip, Andrew Mitchell, and the prominent rightwing backbencher, David Davis. The prime minister said he only realised his remarks had been misinterpreted when he read the newspapers on Monday morning. His officials denied he had been forced into a hasty U-turn by an angry reaction to the newspaper reports in London from senior Conservative figures such as Andrew Mitchell, the former chief whip, and David Davis, the prominent rightwing backbencher.
However Downing Street by its normal standards had been slow to jump on the reports overnight, and also seemed to have allowed the junior communities minister, James Wharton, to appear on the BBC to assert that Cameron was right to say ministerial collective responsibility would apply in a referendum. Cameron insisted: “I was clearly referring to a process of renegotiation. I have always said what I want is an outcome for Britain that keeps us in a reformed EU, but I have also said that we do not yet know the outcome of these negotiations which is why I have always said ‘I rule nothing out, and therefore it is wrong to answer hypothetical questions’. We are going to have to take this stage by stage and step by step.”
Wharton, believing he was following the government line, asserted anyone serving in the government would have to resign if they wanted to oppose the official position on a referendum vote. Tying himself further in knots, he continued: “What I said yesterday is that if you want to be part of the government you have to take the view that we are engaged in a renegotiation to have a referendum that will lead to a successful outcome.”
“That is, fundamentally, what that means,” Wharton said. “If the government is taking a government position, if collective responsibility is applied, if you don’t want to support that position you have to leave.
“You are then free to campaign for whatever you want, to vote for whoever you want. If we get to a position where the government’s position is that this renegotiation has been successful – and the details will be there for everyone to see when we get to that point – then it is reasonable to expect that collective responsibility will apply.”
It is rare for a minister to be put up for a flagship programme such as BBC Today unless he or she has been given and understands the government line on an issue.
But Cameron said: “I was clearly referring to a process of renegotiation. I have always said what I want is an outcome for Britain that keeps us in a reformed EU, but I have also said that we do not yet know the outcome of these negotiations which is why I have always said ‘I rule nothing out, and therefore it is wrong to answer hypothetical questions’. We are going to have to take this stage by stage and step by step.”
Tying himself further in knots he continued: “What I said yesterday is that if you want to be part of the government, you have to take the view that we are engaged in a renegotiation to have a referendum that will lead to a successful outcome.”
Until Cameron gave this new interpretation of his remarks, the issue of collective responsibility applying to the renegotiation had not been thought to arise since no minister was likely to object in principle to such a renegotiation.
He added: “I don’t know the outcome of the negotiations. I hope and I believe the outcome will be Britain with a better place in the EU, dealing with our problems, and therefore I will be able to recommend Britain will be able to stay in a reformed EU.
“That is the aim, the goal, that is what I want to achieve and I am confident of achieving it. I have said many times I do not know the outcome of the negotiations and if I don’t achieve what I want, I rule nothing out. And given I have said that, and I don’t achieve what I want, I cannot answer the question what would happen during the referendum.”
He then seemed to assert the government will have a collective view, even if the decision on ministerial freedom during the campaign is unresolved.
He said: “I don’t believe the government is a bystander in this. The government will have a clear view – the view I want to get us to is a successful renegotiation reform of the EU and being able to recommend Britain should stay in the EU. And in that case, the government is not going to be a bystander and the government will have a very clear view.”
Cameron is to hold further bilateral meetings in the sidelines of an EU summit on Wednesday, and he is also scheduled to meet the Italian prime minister Mario Renzi in the coming weeks.
Related: Cameron withdraws threat to sack Brexit ministers in EU referendum U-turn - Politics live
Related: Ten ways in which life could change if the UK left the EURelated: Ten ways in which life could change if the UK left the EU
Membership Event: Guardian Newsroom: Brexit - what would happen if Britain left the EU? However Downing Street, by its normal standards, had been slow to jump on the now dismissed overnight reports, and also seemed to have allowed Wharton to appear on the BBC to say Cameron was right to assert ministerial collective responsibility would apply in a referendum.
Wharton, believing he was following the government line, said anyone serving in the government would have to resign if they wanted to oppose the official position on a referendum vote. “That is, fundamentally, what that means,” Wharton said.
It is rare for a minister to be put up for a flagship programme such as Today on BBC Radio 4 unless the minister has been given and understands the government line on an issue.
There was confusion at Westminster at how the prime minister had allowed mixed messages to emerge from the G7 summit. One group thought that No 10 had decided to assert its authority after the launch of a new group of eurosceptic Tory MPs, Conservatives for Britain, whose central demand for parliament to be given a veto over EU legislation was rejected out of hand by ministers.
Others suggested that Cameron, who was distracted at the G7 summit, may have been slow to appreciate the reporting of his remarks on Sunday.
Until Cameron gave the new interpretation of his remarks, the issue of collective responsibility applying to any renegotiation of the UK’s position in the European Union had not been thought to arise since no minister was likely to object in principle to such a renegotiation.
Cameron added: “I don’t know the outcome of the negotiations. I hope and I believe the outcome will be Britain with a better place in the EU dealing with our problems, and therefore I will be able to recommend Britain will be able to stay in a reformed EU.
“That is the aim, that is what I want to achieve, and I am confident of achieving it. I have said many times I do not know the outcome of the negotiations and if I don’t achieve what I want I rule nothing out.”
He then seemed to assert the government will have a collective view, even if the decision on ministerial freedom during the campaign is unresolved. He said: “I don’t believe the government is a bystander in this. The government will have a clear view. The view I want to get us to is a successful reform of the EU and being able to recommend Britain should stay in.”
Cameron is to hold further bilateral meetings in the sidelines of an EU summit on Wednesday, and he is also to scheduled to meet the Italian prime minister, Mario Renzi, in the coming weeks.