This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/jun/08/david-cameron-u-turn-britains-eu-membership-referendum

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
EU referendum: David Cameron makes U-turn on threat to sack ministers EU referendum: David Cameron clarifies his clarification on EU referendum
(about 2 hours later)
David Cameron has announced that he has yet to decide whether to impose collective responsibility on ministers in the referendum on Britain’s EU membership, saying it would be a step-by-step process. David Cameron’s approach to the EU referendum campaign was in danger of slipping from confusion to farce when he clarified his position by saying he could not yet decide if ministers will be free to campaign as they wish during the planned European referendum campaign.
But he insisted the British government will have a view on the outcome of the negotiations on the terms of British membership and will not be a by-stander.
The prime minister had been widely reported as proposing to impose collective ministerial responsibility during the referendum following a briefing he gave on Sunday, but Cameron said he had been misinterpreted, and blamed reporters accompanying him at the G7 summit in Bavaria for misunderstanding him.
He said collective ministerial responsibility only applies to the current stage of the renegotiations, but no decision had been made on whether ministers will be free to campaign to stay in or leave during the referendum campaign. He said ministers are currently required, as part of being in government, to expect a successful outcome to EU negotiations.
Cameron’s closing press conference at the end of the summit was dominated by questions on his approach to ministerial responsibility during the referendum campaign, and he will be frustrated that his first appearance on the world stage since his re-election largely saw him answering questions on how he is to prevent his party fracturing on whether the UK should remain a member of the European Union.
He said he only realised his remarks had been misinterpreted when he read the newspapers this morning, and his officials denied he had been forced into a hasty u-turn by an angry reaction to the newspaper reports in London from senior Conservative figures such as former chief whip, Andrew Mitchell, and the prominent rightwing backbencher, David Davis.
However Downing Street by its normal standards had been slow to jump on the reports overnight, and also seemed to have allowed the junior communities minister, James Wharton, to appear on the BBC to assert that Cameron was right to say ministerial collective responsibility would apply in a referendum.
Wharton, believing he was following the government line, asserted anyone serving in the government would have to resign if they wanted to oppose the official position on a referendum vote.
“That is, fundamentally, what that means,” Wharton said. “If the government is taking a government position, if collective responsibility is applied, if you don’t want to support that position you have to leave.
“You are then free to campaign for whatever you want, to vote for whoever you want. If we get to a position where the government’s position is that this renegotiation has been successful – and the details will be there for everyone to see when we get to that point – then it is reasonable to expect that collective responsibility will apply.”
It is rare for a minister to be put up for a flagship programme such as BBC Today unless he or she has been given and understands the government line on an issue.
But Cameron said: “I was clearly referring to a process of renegotiation. I have always said what I want is an outcome for Britain that keeps us in a reformed EU, but I have also said that we do not yet know the outcome of these negotiations which is why I have always said ‘I rule nothing out, and therefore it is wrong to answer hypothetical questions’. We are going to have to take this stage by stage and step by step.”
Tying himself further in knots he continued: “What I said yesterday is that if you want to be part of the government, you have to take the view that we are engaged in a renegotiation to have a referendum that will lead to a successful outcome.”
Until Cameron gave this new interpretation of his remarks, the issue of collective responsibility applying to the renegotiation had not been thought to arise since no minister was likely to object in principle to such a renegotiation.
He added: “I don’t know the outcome of the negotiations. I hope and I believe the outcome will be Britain with a better place in the EU, dealing with our problems, and therefore I will be able to recommend Britain will be able to stay in a reformed EU.
“That is the aim, the goal, that is what I want to achieve and I am confident of achieving it. I have said many times I do not know the outcome of the negotiations and if I don’t achieve what I want, I rule nothing out. And given I have said that, and I don’t achieve what I want, I cannot answer the question what would happen during the referendum.”
He then seemed to assert the government will have a collective view, even if the decision on ministerial freedom during the campaign is unresolved.
He said: “I don’t believe the government is a bystander in this. The government will have a clear view – the view I want to get us to is a successful renegotiation reform of the EU and being able to recommend Britain should stay in the EU. And in that case, the government is not going to be a bystander and the government will have a very clear view.”
Cameron is to hold further bilateral meetings in the sidelines of an EU summit on Wednesday, and he is also scheduled to meet the Italian prime minister Mario Renzi in the coming weeks.
Related: Cameron withdraws threat to sack Brexit ministers in EU referendum U-turn - Politics liveRelated: Cameron withdraws threat to sack Brexit ministers in EU referendum U-turn - Politics live
The prime minister said his remarks in Bavaria on Sunday had been misinterpreted by a series of newspapers, including the Guardian, which reported overnight that ministers would have to leave the government if they opposed his new EU settlement.
Speaking at a press conference on Monday afternoon, the prime minister said: “It is clear to me that what I said yesterday was misinterpreted. I was clearly referring to the process of renegotiation and am happy to repeat exactly what I said yesterday.
“I have always said what I want is an outcome for Britain that keeps us in a reformed EU. But I have also said that we don’t know the outcome of these negotiations, which is why I have always said I rule nothing out. Therefore it would be wrong to answer hypothetical questions.
“I know that can be frustrating. I know you want to jump to the end of the process and have all the questions answered now about the end of that process. That is not going to be possible so we are going to have to take this stage by stage, step by step and you will get the answers.”
The prime minister spoke a few hours after his spokeswoman said that, at this stage, he was only seeking to impose responsibility during the period of negotiations about a new relationship with the EU – a period that did not cover the timeframe around an eventual vote.
“The prime minister has set out his position during the negotiation and not beyond that,” she said.
No 10 insisted Cameron had not backtracked in the face of hostility from Conservative ministers or leading figures on the backbenches responding to the newspaper reports.
Related: Ten ways in which life could change if the UK left the EURelated: Ten ways in which life could change if the UK left the EU
Instead, it said Cameron had been misinterpreted in a briefing he gave on Sunday, and that he did not realise until Monday.
During Sunday’s briefing, Cameron was asked: “Can I just check, on the EU referendum, have you absolutely closed your mind to allowing ministers a free vote? That’s a no-no?”
Cameron replied: “I’ve been very clear, which is I’ve said that if you want to be part of the government, you have to take the view that we are engaged in an exercise of renegotiation to have a referendum, and that will lead to a successful outcome.”
The prime minister was then asked: “So anyone in government who opposes that will have to resign?”
He replied: “Everyone in government has signed up to the programme set out in the Conservative manifesto.”
Downing Street was aware of the newspaper reports for at least 12 hours before issuing their response.
The spokeswoman said: “The position is the prime minister has not set out his position. The prime minister was clearly talking about collective responsibility during the renegotiation.”
It is hard to see how the issue of collective responsibility becomes a live issue during a renegotiation since it is hard to see on what issue a minister would seek to express dissent during that process.
Membership Event: Guardian Newsroom: Brexit - what would happen if Britain left the EU?Membership Event: Guardian Newsroom: Brexit - what would happen if Britain left the EU?
Downing Street’s claim that the prime minister had been misinterpreted was not helped after James Wharton appeared to endorse Cameron’s thinking. The communities minister, who made an unsuccessful attempt to introduce an EU referendum through a private member’s bill in the last parliament, made no attempt to challenge the newspapers’ interpretation of the prime minister’s remarks.
Asked whether ministers should be forced to leave the government if they wanted to campaign on a different side to the prime minister, Wharton said: “On big issues like this, we saw it recently with the Scottish referendum, the government itself takes a position. We have a long-established principle of collective responsibility.”
David Davis, the former shadow home secretary who had earlier warned the prime minister that he risks sparking a bitter Conservative party row after adopting a “my way or the highway” approach, welcomed the apparent change of heart.
“It is vital that ordinary decent honourable members of the government – ministers in the cabinet or junior ministers – are allowed, as everybody else is, to vote the way they want, speak the way they want, campaign the way they want,” Davis told Sky News.