This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/abercrombie--fitch-head-scarf-case-us-supreme-court-rules-in-favour-of-samantha-elauf-failed-to-get-hired-after-wearing-scarf-to-interview-10289671.html

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Abercrombie & Fitch head scarf case: US Supreme Court rules in favour of Samantha Elauf, failed to get hired after wearing scarf to interview Abercrombie & Fitch head scarf case: US Supreme Court rules for Muslim Samantha Elauf, refused job after wearing scarf to interview
(35 minutes later)
The Supreme Court has sided with a Muslim woman who did not get hired after she showed up to a job interview with clothing retailer Abercrombie & Fitch wearing a head scarf.The Supreme Court has sided with a Muslim woman who did not get hired after she showed up to a job interview with clothing retailer Abercrombie & Fitch wearing a head scarf.
The Associated Press said that justices on Monday said that employers generally have to accommodate job applicants and employees with religious needs if the employer at least has an idea that such accommodation is necessary.The Associated Press said that justices on Monday said that employers generally have to accommodate job applicants and employees with religious needs if the employer at least has an idea that such accommodation is necessary.
Job applicant Samantha Elauf did not tell her interviewer she was Muslim.Job applicant Samantha Elauf did not tell her interviewer she was Muslim.
But Justice Antonin Scalia said for the court that Abercrombie "at least suspected" that Elauf wore a head scarf for religious reasons.But Justice Antonin Scalia said for the court that Abercrombie "at least suspected" that Elauf wore a head scarf for religious reasons.
Mr Scalia said: "That is enough."Mr Scalia said: "That is enough."