This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/boys-are-train-drivers-and-girls-are-cupcakes-according-to-boots-baby-harnesses-9417398.html
The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 1 | Version 2 |
---|---|
Boys are 'train drivers' and girls are 'cupcakes' according to Boots baby harnesses | Boys are 'train drivers' and girls are 'cupcakes' according to Boots baby harnesses |
(about 2 hours later) | |
When does gender discrimination start? Pretty much from birth, according to these baby harnesses on sale at Boots. | When does gender discrimination start? Pretty much from birth, according to these baby harnesses on sale at Boots. |
The reins specifically for boys are blue and carry the slogan “train driver”, while the girls’ product is pink with the words “little cupcake”. | The reins specifically for boys are blue and carry the slogan “train driver”, while the girls’ product is pink with the words “little cupcake”. |
Isabel Rogers, a writer, tweeted a picture of the controversial products when she spotted them on Thursday. | Isabel Rogers, a writer, tweeted a picture of the controversial products when she spotted them on Thursday. |
Soon it was going viral on Twitter, with critics citing it as an example of “everyday sexism” , while some men pointed out that they would rather be a cupcake than a train driver anyway. | Soon it was going viral on Twitter, with critics citing it as an example of “everyday sexism” , while some men pointed out that they would rather be a cupcake than a train driver anyway. |
In a blog post, Isabel, who has a four-year-old daughter, argued that the harnesses showed sexism in marketing was getting worse. | In a blog post, Isabel, who has a four-year-old daughter, argued that the harnesses showed sexism in marketing was getting worse. |
“Boys are in charge, going places,” she wrote. “Girls are both ‘little’ and apparently delicious.” | “Boys are in charge, going places,” she wrote. “Girls are both ‘little’ and apparently delicious.” |
Nice one, Boots. What are you thinking? Jacky Fleming never more right with her advice: be a bloody train driver. pic.twitter.com/gVmx70Weip | Nice one, Boots. What are you thinking? Jacky Fleming never more right with her advice: be a bloody train driver. pic.twitter.com/gVmx70Weip |
On its website, Boots also has a plain harness for sale in black with no decoration. | On its website, Boots also has a plain harness for sale in black with no decoration. |
The outrage follows a growing debate about the impact of separating children’s clothing and toys by gender. | The outrage follows a growing debate about the impact of separating children’s clothing and toys by gender. |
In September, Toys ‘R’ Us pledged to stop segregating its toys after a campaign by anti-discrimination group Let Toys Be Toys. | In September, Toys ‘R’ Us pledged to stop segregating its toys after a campaign by anti-discrimination group Let Toys Be Toys. |
Months earlier, Tesco had defended its decision to keep a chemistry set as a “boys’ toy”, while selling miniature cookers in the girls’ section. | Months earlier, Tesco had defended its decision to keep a chemistry set as a “boys’ toy”, while selling miniature cookers in the girls’ section. |
A spokesman for Boots said parents' feedback was taken "very seriously". | |
She added: "In line with our commitment to prevent gender stereotyping through signage in our stores we can confirm that these items have already been reviewed and the product and packaging is being updated later this year. | |
"We base our children’s range on customer feedback and demand, and aim to offer a range of colours and choices for parents.” |