This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . The next check for changes will be

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/explainers-57085964#2

The article has changed 7 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Covid inquiry: What is it investigating and how does it work? What is the UK Covid inquiry and what powers does it have?
(about 2 months later)
The UK Covid Inquiry has begun work on the pandemic's impact on children and young people. Significant flaws in UK pandemic preparations led to more deaths and greater economic damage than should have been the case, according to the first report from the Covid inquiry.
The inquiry has already heard from key politicians, government advisers, civil servants, scientific and medical experts and representatives of bereaved families, at hearings in London, Edinburgh, Cardiff and Belfast. Just under 227,000 people died in the UK from Covid between March 2020 and May 2023, when the World Health Organization declared the end of the "global health emergency".
What is a public inquiry? What is the Covid public inquiry and when did it start?
Public inquiries respond to "public concern" about events. Established and funded by government, they are led by an independent chair. The Covid inquiry was launched by former Prime Minister Boris Johnson in June 2022, more than a year after he said the government's actions would be put "under the microscope".
Inquiries can demand evidence and compel witnesses to attend. The announcement came after the Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice campaign said it was considering launching a judicial review over government "time-wasting".
No-one is found guilty or innocent but conclusions are published. The government is not obliged to accept any recommendations. Mr Johnson said the inquiry would cover decision-making during the pandemic by the UK government, as well as the administrations in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland.
The Covid inquiry, originally announced by former Prime Minister Boris Johnson, covers decision-making during the pandemic by the UK government and in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. The first public hearings took place in June 2023.
At the time, Mr Johnson said the government's response would be "under the microscope". Public inquiries are established and funded by the government and are led by an independent chair. They can compel witnesses to give evidence.
No-one is found guilty or innocent but the inquiry publishes conclusions. The government is not obliged to accept any recommendations.
Covid inquiry: The UK pandemic in numbersCovid inquiry: The UK pandemic in numbers
Covid inquiry: The UK pandemic in numbersCovid inquiry: The UK pandemic in numbers
How do Covid death rates compare across the UK?How do Covid death rates compare across the UK?
How do Covid death rates compare across the UK?How do Covid death rates compare across the UK?
Who is leading the Covid inquiry and how does it work? UK 'failed citizens' with flawed pandemic plans
The Covid inquiry began on 28 June 2022. UK 'failed citizens' with flawed pandemic plans
It is chaired by former judge and crossbench peer Baroness Hallett, who previously led the inquests into the 7 July London bombings. Who is leading the Covid inquiry?
The inquiry is chaired by former judge and crossbench peer Baroness Hallett, who previously led the inquests into the 7 July London bombings.
She said that loss and suffering would be at the heart of the inquiry, adding it would be "firmly independent".
Baroness Hallett promised the inquiry would be "thorough and fair"Baroness Hallett promised the inquiry would be "thorough and fair"
Baroness Hallett promised the inquiry would be "thorough and fair"Baroness Hallett promised the inquiry would be "thorough and fair"
She said the inquiry would consider how decisions on limiting the spread of Covid were made and communicated, and the use of lockdowns and face coverings.
It also includes the impact of the pandemic on children and health and care sector workers, and the protection of the clinically vulnerable.
The effect on bereaved families and how the findings could be applied to other national emergencies are part of the inquiry.
Loss and suffering at heart of Covid inquiry
Loss and suffering at heart of Covid inquiry
What does the Covid inquiry's first report say?
At least nine reports are expected, covering everything from political decision-making to vaccines.
Publishing the first of these, inquiry chair Baroness Hallett said the UK was "ill-prepared for dealing with a catastrophic emergency, let alone the coronavirus pandemic".
"Never again can a disease be allowed to lead to so many deaths and so much suffering," she added.
The 217-page report argues the UK planned for the wrong pandemic - a mild one where spread of a new virus was inevitable - and this led to the "untested" policy of lockdown.
It says the UK government and devolved nations "failed their citizens" and that government ministers did not sufficiently challenge scientific experts.
It makes a series of recommendations for reforming the way the government approaches emergency planning across the four nations of the UK.
Baroness Hallett said she wants to see these acted on quickly, with many in place within six months or a year.
Covid inquiry: Full report, external and Covid inquiry: Summary report, external
Covid inquiry: Full report, external and Covid inquiry: Summary report, external
UK 'failed citizens' with flawed pandemic plans
UK 'failed citizens' with flawed pandemic plans
LIVE: Government ‘failed its citizens’ on Covid by planning for wrong pandemic, report finds
LIVE: Government ‘failed its citizens’ on Covid by planning for wrong pandemic, report finds
What else is the inquiry looking at?
The inquiry is split into different parts., external Work has begun in several areas:The inquiry is split into different parts., external Work has begun in several areas:
resilience and preparednessresilience and preparedness
resilience and preparednessresilience and preparedness
decision-making and political governance in Westminster, Scotland, Wales and Northern Irelanddecision-making and political governance in Westminster, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland
decision-making and political governance in Westminster, Scotland, Wales and Northern Irelanddecision-making and political governance in Westminster, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland
the impact on healthcare systems across the UKthe impact on healthcare systems across the UK
the impact on healthcare systems across the UKthe impact on healthcare systems across the UK
vaccines, therapeutics and antiviral treatmentvaccines, therapeutics and antiviral treatment
vaccines, therapeutics and antiviral treatmentvaccines, therapeutics and antiviral treatment
government procurement and PPEgovernment procurement and PPE
government procurement and PPEgovernment procurement and PPE
the care sectorthe care sector
the care sectorthe care sector
test-and-tracetest-and-trace
test-and-tracetest-and-trace
the impact on children and young peoplethe impact on children and young people
the impact on children and young peoplethe impact on children and young people
Future strands will consider:
the government's business and financial responsesthe government's business and financial responses
the government's business and financial responsesthe government's business and financial responses
Future strands will consider:
health inequalitieshealth inequalities
health inequalitieshealth inequalities
other public services the impact on other public services
other public services the impact on other public services
There is no specific timescale for how long the inquiry will last but details of public hearings through until summer 2025 have been published. There is no specific timescale for how long the inquiry will last, but Baroness Hallett aims to hold the final public hearings in 2026.
A report on the inquiry's first area of work is expected in summer 2024. Scotland is holding a separate inquiry which has taken evidence from many of the same experts and politicians.
Public hearings are also examining government decision making in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, external. How can the public get involved in the Covid inquiry?
Scotland is also holding a separate inquiry which will take evidence from many of the same experts and politicians. Anyone can share their experience through the inquiry's Every Story Matters, external project.
Loss and suffering at heart of Covid inquiry Groups representing bereaved families have urged the inquiry to ensure these voices are heard.
Loss and suffering at heart of Covid inquiry Members of the public can also apply to attend in person., external
A tale of two very different Covid inquiries Public hearings are streamed on the BBC News website and the inquiry's YouTube channel,, external. In addition, witness transcripts are published on the inquiry website., external
A tale of two very different Covid inquiries What did Rishi Sunak say to the inquiry?
Who gave evidence during the hearings in Northern Ireland? In December 2023, former PM Rishi Sunak gave evidence during the second round of public hearings in London which focused on UK decision making and political governance, external.
Across 12 days of hearings, the inquiry took evidence from senior politicians, including First Minister Michelle O'Neill, Health Minister Robin Swann and former First Minister Baroness Foster.
During her evidence, Lady Foster rejected suggestions the Northern Ireland Executive "sleepwalked" into the pandemic.
Separately, Ms O'Neill apologised for attending senior republican Bobby Storey's funeral during lockdown, when she was deputy first minister.
Health Minister Robin Swann said meetings he had attended, in November 2020, on Covid rules had been the "lowest days" he had experienced in politics.
Other witnesses included civil servants, experts and groups representing bereaved families, older people and those with disabilities.
Sorrys and surprises as O'Neill and Foster face inquiry
Sorrys and surprises as O'Neill and Foster face inquiry
'Devastating evidence' as Covid policy scrutinised
'Devastating evidence' as Covid policy scrutinised
Who gave evidence during the hearings in Wales?
Most of the hearings focused on the first wave of the pandemic.
The inquiry heard from 34 witnesses, including former First Minister Mark Drakeford, who likened then Prime Minister Boris Johnson during the crisis to an "absent" football manager.
First Minister Mark Drakeford criticised Boris Johnson's leadership during the pandemic
First Minister Mark Drakeford criticised Boris Johnson's leadership during the pandemic
A number of witnesses accused the Welsh government of issuing conflicting, contradictory and confusing guidance and criticised the:
approach to personal protection equipment (PPE)
approach to personal protection equipment (PPE)
treatment of care home residents
treatment of care home residents
decision to close schools
decision to close schools
The cancellation of the Wales v Scotland Six Nations rugby match, in March 2020, 24 hours before it had been due to start, was referenced several times.
Kirsten Heaven, counsel for the Covid-19 Bereaved Families Cymru:
said there had been a "passive, slow and disjointed" early response to the pandemic
said there had been a "passive, slow and disjointed" early response to the pandemic
criticised the "sloth-like urgency" of ministers' response
criticised the "sloth-like urgency" of ministers' response
called for the publication of all relevant government WhatsApp messages
called for the publication of all relevant government WhatsApp messages
Andrew Kinnier KC, representing the Welsh government, said ministers accepted some policies had not worked as well as they had hoped but their decisions had been a "reasonable response to the unprecedented challenge to civil society".
Five things we learned from the Covid inquiry
Five things we learned from the Covid inquiry
Who gave evidence during the hearings in Scotland?
The use of WhatsApp by Scottish government advisers and ministers was a key issue.
First Minister Humza Yousaf apologised unreservedly for the Scottish government's failure to hand over relevant WhatsApp messages.
Nicola Sturgeon told the inquiry that she and her government were "open, transparent and accountable"
Nicola Sturgeon told the inquiry that she and her government were "open, transparent and accountable"
Former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon admitted that she deleted messages from the period.
But she insisted that she did not use these informal channels to reach decisions or to have substantial discussions and that everything of relevance was available on the public record.
Ms Sturgeon was emotional during some of her evidence and appeared to fight back tears as she told the inquiry that "part of me wishes I hadn't been [First Minister during the pandemic]".
The awkward Covid questions Nicola Sturgeon faced
The awkward Covid questions Nicola Sturgeon faced
UK Covid inquiry in Scotland: Five things we learned
UK Covid inquiry in Scotland: Five things we learned
What did PM Rishi Sunak say to the inquiry?
Mr Sunak gave evidence during the second round of public hearings in London which focused on UK decision making and political governance, external.
He apologised to "all those who suffered... as a result of the actions that were taken" but denied his Eat Out to Help Out Scheme had increased Covid infections and deaths.He apologised to "all those who suffered... as a result of the actions that were taken" but denied his Eat Out to Help Out Scheme had increased Covid infections and deaths.
Rishi Sunak served food at Wagamama as part of a promotional event for Eat Out to Help OutRishi Sunak served food at Wagamama as part of a promotional event for Eat Out to Help Out
Rishi Sunak served food at Wagamama as part of a promotional event for Eat Out to Help OutRishi Sunak served food at Wagamama as part of a promotional event for Eat Out to Help Out
He also rejected earlier evidence from the government's chief medical officer, Prof Sir Chris Whitty, and former chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance that they were not consulted about the policy.He also rejected earlier evidence from the government's chief medical officer, Prof Sir Chris Whitty, and former chief scientific adviser Sir Patrick Vallance that they were not consulted about the policy.
Did Sunak's Eat Out scheme help to spread Covid?Did Sunak's Eat Out scheme help to spread Covid?
Did Sunak's Eat Out scheme help to spread Covid?Did Sunak's Eat Out scheme help to spread Covid?
What did Boris Johnson say to the inquiry?What did Boris Johnson say to the inquiry?
The former prime minister gave evidence across two days. Former PM Boris Johnson also gave evidence across two days in December 2023 as part of the second round of hearings.
The inquiry had already heard from government officials and advisers, academic experts and representatives of bereaved families, many of whom were extremely critical of his actions.The inquiry had already heard from government officials and advisers, academic experts and representatives of bereaved families, many of whom were extremely critical of his actions.
Mr Johnson began by apologising for the "pain and the loss and the suffering" experienced during the pandemic.Mr Johnson began by apologising for the "pain and the loss and the suffering" experienced during the pandemic.
His comments were interrupted by protesters who were ordered to leave the room. Some members of bereaved families held up signs reading: "The dead can't hear your apologies".His comments were interrupted by protesters who were ordered to leave the room. Some members of bereaved families held up signs reading: "The dead can't hear your apologies".
Barnard Castle, ICU and heckling: Johnson grilled at Covid inquiryBarnard Castle, ICU and heckling: Johnson grilled at Covid inquiry
Barnard Castle, ICU and heckling: Johnson grilled at Covid inquiryBarnard Castle, ICU and heckling: Johnson grilled at Covid inquiry
He admitted mistakes were made and that "there were unquestionably things we should have done differently".He admitted mistakes were made and that "there were unquestionably things we should have done differently".
He said he took "personal responsibility for all decisions made" but insisted that ministers had done their "level best" in difficult circumstances.He said he took "personal responsibility for all decisions made" but insisted that ministers had done their "level best" in difficult circumstances.
Contrite, shorn of theatrics - Johnson's first day at inquiryContrite, shorn of theatrics - Johnson's first day at inquiry
Contrite, shorn of theatrics - Johnson's first day at inquiryContrite, shorn of theatrics - Johnson's first day at inquiry
Five takeaways from Johnson at the Covid inquiryFive takeaways from Johnson at the Covid inquiry
Five takeaways from Johnson at the Covid inquiryFive takeaways from Johnson at the Covid inquiry
Who else gave evidence during the second round of public hearings?Who else gave evidence during the second round of public hearings?
The second round of public hearings began in October 2023.
Former Health Secretary Matt Hancock - who previously told the inquiry the UK's pandemic strategy had been completely wrong - denied he lied to colleagues during his period in office.Former Health Secretary Matt Hancock - who previously told the inquiry the UK's pandemic strategy had been completely wrong - denied he lied to colleagues during his period in office.
But he admitted the UK should have locked down much sooner and criticised the "toxic culture" in government, for which he blamed Mr Johnson's former adviser Dominic Cummings.But he admitted the UK should have locked down much sooner and criticised the "toxic culture" in government, for which he blamed Mr Johnson's former adviser Dominic Cummings.
Cabinet minister Michael Gove also apologised to "victims and families who endured so much loss" but denied Mr Johnson could not take decisions. Former cabinet minister Michael Gove also apologised to "victims and families who endured so much loss" but denied that Mr Johnson could not take decisions.
Sir Chris, his former deputy Prof Sir Jonathan Van-Tam and Sir Patrick revealed significant tensions between their advice to government and its political priorities, such as over Eat Out to Help Out.Sir Chris, his former deputy Prof Sir Jonathan Van-Tam and Sir Patrick revealed significant tensions between their advice to government and its political priorities, such as over Eat Out to Help Out.
Mr Johnson, Sir Chris and Sir Patrick talked to journalists at Downing St during the pandemicMr Johnson, Sir Chris and Sir Patrick talked to journalists at Downing St during the pandemic
Mr Johnson, Sir Chris and Sir Patrick talked to journalists at Downing St during the pandemicMr Johnson, Sir Chris and Sir Patrick talked to journalists at Downing St during the pandemic
Sir Jonathan revealed he and his family had received death threats, while Sir Patrick said he had also considered resigning over abuse.Sir Jonathan revealed he and his family had received death threats, while Sir Patrick said he had also considered resigning over abuse.
Former deputy cabinet secretary Helen MacNamara told the inquiry that she struggled "to pick one day" when Covid rules were properly followed inside a "macho" and "toxic" No 10.Former deputy cabinet secretary Helen MacNamara told the inquiry that she struggled "to pick one day" when Covid rules were properly followed inside a "macho" and "toxic" No 10.
Dominic Cummings was highly critical of former MP Boris Johnson's approachDominic Cummings was highly critical of former MP Boris Johnson's approach
Dominic Cummings was highly critical of former MP Boris Johnson's approachDominic Cummings was highly critical of former MP Boris Johnson's approach
In his evidence, Mr Cummings described a "dysfunctional" government with no plans to lock down the country or shield the vulnerable.In his evidence, Mr Cummings described a "dysfunctional" government with no plans to lock down the country or shield the vulnerable.
The inquiry heard scathing text messages which he sent, many of which contained offensive descriptions of ministers and officials.The inquiry heard scathing text messages which he sent, many of which contained offensive descriptions of ministers and officials.
He said he regretted the disastrous handling of his infamous trip to Barnard Castle during the first lockdown but denied his actions had damaged public trust. He said he regretted the disastrous handling of his infamous trip to Barnard Castle during the first lockdown, but denied his actions had damaged public trust.
Covid inquiry WhatsApps paint picture of chaosCovid inquiry WhatsApps paint picture of chaos
Covid inquiry WhatsApps paint picture of chaosCovid inquiry WhatsApps paint picture of chaos
How inquiry is exposing deep flaws in Covid decision-makingHow inquiry is exposing deep flaws in Covid decision-making
How inquiry is exposing deep flaws in Covid decision-makingHow inquiry is exposing deep flaws in Covid decision-making
Who gave evidence during the first round of public hearings?Who gave evidence during the first round of public hearings?
The first public hearings, which considered the UK's resilience and preparedness, external, took evidence from 69 independent experts and former and current government officials and ministers. The first public hearings examining the UK's resilience and preparedness, external began in June 2023.
The inquiry took evidence from 69 independent experts and former and current government officials and ministers.
Prof Dame Sally Davies tells the Covid inquiry that "it wasn't just the deaths, it was the way they died".Prof Dame Sally Davies tells the Covid inquiry that "it wasn't just the deaths, it was the way they died".
Prof Dame Sally Davies tells the Covid inquiry that "it wasn't just the deaths, it was the way they died".Prof Dame Sally Davies tells the Covid inquiry that "it wasn't just the deaths, it was the way they died".
These included former health secretaries Jeremy Hunt and Matt Hancock, former prime minister David Cameron and former first minister of Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon. These included former health secretaries Jeremy Hunt and Matt Hancock, former PM David Cameron and former First Minister of Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon.
Sir Chris, his predecessor Prof Dame Sally Davies and Sir Patrick also gave evidence during the first hearings.Sir Chris, his predecessor Prof Dame Sally Davies and Sir Patrick also gave evidence during the first hearings.
Covid Inquiry: What have we learnt so far?Covid Inquiry: What have we learnt so far?
Covid Inquiry: What have we learnt so far?Covid Inquiry: What have we learnt so far?
How can the public get involved? Who gave evidence during the hearings in Northern Ireland?
Anyone can share their experience through the inquiry's Every Story Matters, external project. Across 12 days of hearings in May 2024, the inquiry took evidence from senior politicians, including First Minister Michelle O'Neill, former Health Minister Robin Swann and former First Minister Baroness Foster.
The Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice campaign group - which criticised the government's handling of the pandemic - urged the inquiry to ensure these voices are heard. During her evidence, Lady Foster rejected suggestions the Northern Ireland Executive "sleepwalked" into the pandemic.
Public hearings are streamed on the BBC News website and the inquiry's YouTube channel,, external and witness transcripts are published on the inquiry website., external Separately, Ms O'Neill apologised for attending senior republican Bobby Storey's funeral during lockdown, when she was deputy first minister.
Members of the public can also apply to attend in person., external Mr Swann said meetings he had attended on Covid rules in November 2020 had been the "lowest days" he had experienced in politics.
Other witnesses included civil servants, experts and groups representing bereaved families, older people and those with disabilities.
Sorrys and surprises as O'Neill and Foster face inquiry
Sorrys and surprises as O'Neill and Foster face inquiry
'Devastating evidence' as Covid policy scrutinised
'Devastating evidence' as Covid policy scrutinised
Who gave evidence during the hearings in Wales?
Most of the hearings in March 2024 focused on the first wave of the pandemic.
The inquiry heard from 34 witnesses, including former First Minister Mark Drakeford, who likened then Prime Minister Boris Johnson during the crisis to an "absent" football manager.
Former First Minister Mark Drakeford criticised Boris Johnson's leadership during the pandemic
Former First Minister Mark Drakeford criticised Boris Johnson's leadership during the pandemic
A number of witnesses accused the Welsh government of issuing conflicting, contradictory and confusing guidance and criticised the:
approach to personal protection equipment (PPE)
approach to personal protection equipment (PPE)
treatment of care home residents
treatment of care home residents
decision to close schools
decision to close schools
The cancellation of the Wales v Scotland Six Nations rugby match, in March 2020, 24 hours before it had been due to start, was referenced several times.
Kirsten Heaven, counsel for the Covid-19 Bereaved Families Cymru:
said there had been a "passive, slow and disjointed" early response to the pandemic
said there had been a "passive, slow and disjointed" early response to the pandemic
criticised the "sloth-like urgency" of ministers' response
criticised the "sloth-like urgency" of ministers' response
called for the publication of all relevant government WhatsApp messages
called for the publication of all relevant government WhatsApp messages
Andrew Kinnier KC, representing the Welsh government, said ministers accepted some policies had not worked as well as they had hoped but their decisions had been a "reasonable response to the unprecedented challenge to civil society".
Five things we learned from the Covid inquiry
Five things we learned from the Covid inquiry
Who gave evidence during the hearings in Scotland?
The use of WhatsApp by Scottish government advisers and ministers was a key issue during the January 2024 hearings.
Former First Minister Humza Yousaf apologised unreservedly for the Scottish government's failure to hand over relevant WhatsApp messages.
Former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon told the inquiry that she and her government were "open, transparent and accountable"
Former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon told the inquiry that she and her government were "open, transparent and accountable"
Former First Minister Nicola Sturgeon admitted that she deleted messages from the period.
But she insisted that she did not use these informal channels to reach decisions or to have substantial discussions and that everything of relevance was available on the public record.
Ms Sturgeon was emotional during some of her evidence and appeared to fight back tears as she told the inquiry that "part of me wishes I hadn't been [First Minister during the pandemic]".
The awkward Covid questions Nicola Sturgeon faced
The awkward Covid questions Nicola Sturgeon faced
UK Covid inquiry in Scotland: Five things we learned
UK Covid inquiry in Scotland: Five things we learned
Related TopicsRelated Topics
WalesWales
Coronavirus public inquiryCoronavirus public inquiry
Covid-19 Bereaved Families for JusticeCovid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice
ScotlandScotland
Nicola Sturgeon
Boris JohnsonBoris Johnson
Northern IrelandNorthern Ireland
EnglandEngland
Rishi SunakRishi Sunak
Matthew HancockMatthew Hancock
CoronavirusCoronavirus