This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/feb/06/why-the-obsession-with-calling-it-out

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Why the obsession with ‘calling it out’? Why the obsession with ‘calling it out’?
(5 days later)
LettersLetters
Tue 6 Feb 2018 18.19 GMTTue 6 Feb 2018 18.19 GMT
Last modified on Tue 6 Feb 2018 22.00 GMT Last modified on Wed 14 Feb 2018 17.02 GMT
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
View more sharing optionsView more sharing options
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
CloseClose
The House of Commons is celebrating the centenary of the Representation of the People Act 1918 as I write, and discussing the abuse of politicians, naturally. Almost unanimously they describe discussion of this activity as “calling it out”. How did this phrase suddenly achieve the status of exclusive political correctness? Three or four years ago it was never used in this country. How can we get rid of it?JS BrennanInvernessThe House of Commons is celebrating the centenary of the Representation of the People Act 1918 as I write, and discussing the abuse of politicians, naturally. Almost unanimously they describe discussion of this activity as “calling it out”. How did this phrase suddenly achieve the status of exclusive political correctness? Three or four years ago it was never used in this country. How can we get rid of it?JS BrennanInverness
• As I usually agree with Jenni Murray, my exact contemporary, I was surprised to see that she was mistaken concerning the availability of the pill in the late 1960s (G2, 31 January), stating that it was only available to married women until the 1970s. As an unmarried 18-year-old in 1968, I had no difficulty obtaining it wedding ring-free from my local family planning clinic in London, for which I will be for ever grateful.Moira DohertyReston, Virginia, USA• As I usually agree with Jenni Murray, my exact contemporary, I was surprised to see that she was mistaken concerning the availability of the pill in the late 1960s (G2, 31 January), stating that it was only available to married women until the 1970s. As an unmarried 18-year-old in 1968, I had no difficulty obtaining it wedding ring-free from my local family planning clinic in London, for which I will be for ever grateful.Moira DohertyReston, Virginia, USA
• From bookcases to coffins or vice versa (Letters, 2 February)? I am the proud owner of a bookcase made by my grandfather in the 1930s. It is known in our family as the coffin bookcase. He was a salesman of ironmongery, including coffin handles, and I am reliably informed that the bookcase was made from “coffin boards” acquired from the local joiner in Camborne, Cornwall.Rev Dr Liz SmithIlkley, West Yorkshire• From bookcases to coffins or vice versa (Letters, 2 February)? I am the proud owner of a bookcase made by my grandfather in the 1930s. It is known in our family as the coffin bookcase. He was a salesman of ironmongery, including coffin handles, and I am reliably informed that the bookcase was made from “coffin boards” acquired from the local joiner in Camborne, Cornwall.Rev Dr Liz SmithIlkley, West Yorkshire
• I loved Mark Cocker’s piece about unseasonable birdsong in Norfolk (Country diary, 6 February). Here in west London we’ve been listening since about November to what I assume is a blackbird singing his heart out in the very early hours. Patrick RussellLondon• I loved Mark Cocker’s piece about unseasonable birdsong in Norfolk (Country diary, 6 February). Here in west London we’ve been listening since about November to what I assume is a blackbird singing his heart out in the very early hours. Patrick RussellLondon
• Despite your headline (Letters, 6 February), there was never such a beast as an “auroch”, any more than an “oc” (ox) or “foc” (fox). A group of them should properly be aurochsen.Robin Milner-Gulland Washington, West Sussex• Despite your headline (Letters, 6 February), there was never such a beast as an “auroch”, any more than an “oc” (ox) or “foc” (fox). A group of them should properly be aurochsen.Robin Milner-Gulland Washington, West Sussex
• As a true Yorkshire woman I winced at your five ways to eat yorkshire pudding (G2, 3 February). I couldn’t believe the last one. Leftover yorkshire pud?Annette DentKeighley, West Yorkshire• As a true Yorkshire woman I winced at your five ways to eat yorkshire pudding (G2, 3 February). I couldn’t believe the last one. Leftover yorkshire pud?Annette DentKeighley, West Yorkshire
• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com• Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com
• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters• Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters
PoliticsPolitics
Brief lettersBrief letters
BirdsBirds
WildlifeWildlife
Food & drinkFood & drink
HealthHealth
AnimalsAnimals
lettersletters
Share on FacebookShare on Facebook
Share on TwitterShare on Twitter
Share via EmailShare via Email
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn
Share on PinterestShare on Pinterest
Share on Google+Share on Google+
Share on WhatsAppShare on WhatsApp
Share on MessengerShare on Messenger
Reuse this contentReuse this content