This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/feb/06/why-the-obsession-with-calling-it-out
The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 2 | Version 3 |
|---|---|
| Why the obsession with ‘calling it out’? | Why the obsession with ‘calling it out’? |
| (about 23 hours later) | |
| Letters | |
| Tue 6 Feb 2018 18.19 GMT | |
| Last modified on Tue 6 Feb 2018 22.00 GMT | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| View more sharing options | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Close | |
| The House of Commons is celebrating the centenary of the Representation of the People Act 1918 as I write, and discussing the abuse of politicians, naturally. Almost unanimously they describe discussion of this activity as “calling it out”. How did this phrase suddenly achieve the status of exclusive political correctness? Three or four years ago it was never used in this country. How can we get rid of it?JS BrennanInverness | The House of Commons is celebrating the centenary of the Representation of the People Act 1918 as I write, and discussing the abuse of politicians, naturally. Almost unanimously they describe discussion of this activity as “calling it out”. How did this phrase suddenly achieve the status of exclusive political correctness? Three or four years ago it was never used in this country. How can we get rid of it?JS BrennanInverness |
| • As I usually agree with Jenni Murray, my exact contemporary, I was surprised to see that she was mistaken concerning the availability of the pill in the late 1960s (G2, 31 January), stating that it was only available to married women until the 1970s. As an unmarried 18-year-old in 1968, I had no difficulty obtaining it wedding ring-free from my local family planning clinic in London, for which I will be for ever grateful.Moira DohertyReston, Virginia, USA | • As I usually agree with Jenni Murray, my exact contemporary, I was surprised to see that she was mistaken concerning the availability of the pill in the late 1960s (G2, 31 January), stating that it was only available to married women until the 1970s. As an unmarried 18-year-old in 1968, I had no difficulty obtaining it wedding ring-free from my local family planning clinic in London, for which I will be for ever grateful.Moira DohertyReston, Virginia, USA |
| • From bookcases to coffins or vice versa (Letters, 2 February)? I am the proud owner of a bookcase made by my grandfather in the 1930s. It is known in our family as the coffin bookcase. He was a salesman of ironmongery, including coffin handles, and I am reliably informed that the bookcase was made from “coffin boards” acquired from the local joiner in Camborne, Cornwall.Rev Dr Liz SmithIlkley, West Yorkshire | • From bookcases to coffins or vice versa (Letters, 2 February)? I am the proud owner of a bookcase made by my grandfather in the 1930s. It is known in our family as the coffin bookcase. He was a salesman of ironmongery, including coffin handles, and I am reliably informed that the bookcase was made from “coffin boards” acquired from the local joiner in Camborne, Cornwall.Rev Dr Liz SmithIlkley, West Yorkshire |
| • I loved Mark Cocker’s piece about unseasonable birdsong in Norfolk (Country diary, 6 February). Here in west London we’ve been listening since about November to what I assume is a blackbird singing his heart out in the very early hours. Patrick RussellLondon | • I loved Mark Cocker’s piece about unseasonable birdsong in Norfolk (Country diary, 6 February). Here in west London we’ve been listening since about November to what I assume is a blackbird singing his heart out in the very early hours. Patrick RussellLondon |
| • Despite your headline (Letters, 6 February), there was never such a beast as an “auroch”, any more than an “oc” (ox) or “foc” (fox). A group of them should properly be aurochsen.Robin Milner-Gulland Washington, West Sussex | • Despite your headline (Letters, 6 February), there was never such a beast as an “auroch”, any more than an “oc” (ox) or “foc” (fox). A group of them should properly be aurochsen.Robin Milner-Gulland Washington, West Sussex |
| • As a true Yorkshire woman I winced at your five ways to eat yorkshire pudding (G2, 3 February). I couldn’t believe the last one. Leftover yorkshire pud?Annette DentKeighley, West Yorkshire | • As a true Yorkshire woman I winced at your five ways to eat yorkshire pudding (G2, 3 February). I couldn’t believe the last one. Leftover yorkshire pud?Annette DentKeighley, West Yorkshire |
| • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com | • Join the debate – email guardian.letters@theguardian.com |
| • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters | • Read more Guardian letters – click here to visit gu.com/letters |
| Politics | |
| Brief letters | |
| Birds | |
| Wildlife | |
| Food & drink | |
| Health | |
| Animals | |
| letters | |
| Share on Facebook | |
| Share on Twitter | |
| Share via Email | |
| Share on LinkedIn | |
| Share on Pinterest | |
| Share on Google+ | |
| Share on WhatsApp | |
| Share on Messenger | |
| Reuse this content |