This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2016/mar/02/cardinal-george-pell-testifies-to-the-child-sexual-abuse-royal-commission-from-rome-day-three-live

The article has changed 12 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 3 Version 4
Cardinal George Pell testifies to the child sexual abuse royal commission from Rome, day three – live Cardinal George Pell testifies to the child sexual abuse royal commission from Rome, day three – live
(35 minutes later)
11.06pm GMT
23:06
Back to Father Searson, a notorious child abuser who was never reported to police by the church despite numerous complaints made against him to senior religious figures. Searson died in 2009 without ever being charged.
Furness puts it to Pell that Searson’s behaviour should have been referred to police, especially when it came to light that he had assaulted a girl, and abused a cat.
Furness: “So there is no doubt he should have been sent off to the police, that is right?”
Pell: “Yes. I’m happy to takeyour word for that.”
Furness: “Well,rather than take my word for it, there’s an allegation that he assaulted a child, isn’t there?”
Pell: “Yes.”
Furness: “And that allegation should have gone to the police, shouldn’t it?”
Pell: “Yes. Normally the consent of the parent or the child involved would be obtained before it went to the police. Before you took to it the police.”
Updated
at 11.06pm GMT
10.54pm GMT
22:54
From the Guardian’s federal politics reporter in Canberra - comments from opposition leader, Bill Shorten.
Shorten said he finds it "disturbing" and "challenging" listening to Pell's answers in Royal Comm. @MelissaLDavey @murpharoo
Updated
at 10.57pm GMT
10.51pm GMT
22:51
'We want a meeting with the pope' - survivors
Child sexual abuse survivors from Ballarat watching Pell’s evidence in Rome have just held a press conference calling for a meeting with head of the Roman Catholic Church, Pope Francis.
Their statement said, “We are flying back to Australia on Friday and we’d like to think we can get a meeting.”
Survivors read from statement re meeting Pope. They said they were told to fax request which they did pic.twitter.com/Hp4pUhfp5M
Survivor Philip Nagle said, “We’re getting a little bit tired of hearing what George is saying up there one the stand. We want to be heard. We want someone to show that they care about us.
“You guys are watching Pell up there. He’s giving us nothing. He’s turned his back on us. We want a commitment from the pope that children will be safe.”
Abuse survivor David Ridsdale said; “We’ve seen here a lack of systems that were able to identify and deal with any problems.”
Too many people said “I didn’t think it was my job” to protect children, he told reporters.
Another survivor, Andrew Collins, said the group sent an email requesting a meeting with the pope last week.
“We were told we could only make a formal request via fax”. The survivors sent the fax, “but we still haven’t said anything,” he said.
Nagle said the survivors were no longer interested in Pell’s offer to meet with them. It was Pope Francis that they wanted to hear from, he said, and he wanted a commitment that no child would be abused within the church again.
Updated
at 11.00pm GMT
10.33pm GMT10.33pm GMT
22:3322:33
Morning adjournmentMorning adjournment
The evidence will resume in about 15 minutes.The evidence will resume in about 15 minutes.
This morning, Furness focussed on the widespread abuse at the hands of Peter Searson. Complaints made across two and a half years between 1984 and 1986, were never been acted upon by senior parish staff, including the then archbishop Frank Little, the commission heard. Searson died in 2009 without having faced charges.This morning, Furness focussed on the widespread abuse at the hands of Peter Searson. Complaints made across two and a half years between 1984 and 1986, were never been acted upon by senior parish staff, including the then archbishop Frank Little, the commission heard. Searson died in 2009 without having faced charges.
There is nothing to suggest Pell knew Searson was abusing children at the time, however Pell did say he viewed Searson as “one of the most unpleasant priests I met”.There is nothing to suggest Pell knew Searson was abusing children at the time, however Pell did say he viewed Searson as “one of the most unpleasant priests I met”.
UpdatedUpdated
at 10.34pm GMTat 10.34pm GMT
10.30pm GMT10.30pm GMT
22:3022:30
Child abuse was Archbishop Little's "blind-spot" Child abuse was Archbishop Little's 'blind-spot'
Counsel assisting, Gail Furness, is painting a picture of just how many people around Pell knew that Father Searson was abusing children, sexually, physically and verbally. Counsel assisting, Gail Furness, is painting a picture of just how many people around Pell knew that Searson was abusing children, sexually, physically and verbally.
Pell was unaware of this abusing. Archbishop Frank Little, however, was told repeatedly abuse the complaints against Searson, Furness says. One teacher refused to send her class to Searson alone.Pell was unaware of this abusing. Archbishop Frank Little, however, was told repeatedly abuse the complaints against Searson, Furness says. One teacher refused to send her class to Searson alone.
Furness: “Now it’s the case, isn’t it, Cardinal, that at this stage.. that Father Searson should have been stood down at the very least?” Furness: “Now it’s the case, isn’t it, Cardinal, that at this stage. that Father Searson should have been stood down at the very least?”
Pell: “That is correct.”Pell: “That is correct.”
Furness: “Do you think this is an example of what Bishop Connors referred to asArchbishop’s Little’s blind-spot?” Furness: “Do you think this is an example of what Bishop Connors referred to as Archbishop’s Little’s blind-spot?”
Pell: “Archbishop Little for some reason seemed incapable or unable to deal with Father Searson, or even to provide any adequate level of information about the situation. Yes, you could say one way of describing it is a blind-spot.”Pell: “Archbishop Little for some reason seemed incapable or unable to deal with Father Searson, or even to provide any adequate level of information about the situation. Yes, you could say one way of describing it is a blind-spot.”
Updated
at 10.39pm GMT
10.22pm GMT10.22pm GMT
22:2222:22
Furness tells the commission; “... Father Searson had a tape recorder going while having confession... Father Searson asked children to kneel between his legs when they go to confession.”Furness tells the commission; “... Father Searson had a tape recorder going while having confession... Father Searson asked children to kneel between his legs when they go to confession.”
These concerns were raised to archbishop Little, Furness said. She said Searson also used a tape recorder to record these confessions.These concerns were raised to archbishop Little, Furness said. She said Searson also used a tape recorder to record these confessions.
Furness; “Those complaints, taken together with the previous complaints I referred to, increased the suspicion of Father Searson in relation to his conduct with girls. Doesn’t it And particularly having children kneel between his legs when giving confession is quite abhorrent, isn’t it?” Furness; “Those complaints, taken together with the previous complaints I referred to, increased the suspicion of Father Searson in relation to his conduct with girls. Doesn’t it? And particularly having children kneel between his legs when giving confession is quite abhorrent, isn’t it?”
Pell: “Yes, it is... it would have been would have to have been established by an inquiry and it is abhorrent and something to be investigated.”Pell: “Yes, it is... it would have been would have to have been established by an inquiry and it is abhorrent and something to be investigated.”
Furness: “When you say it needed to be established from an inquiry, it’s clear that Father Searson accepted that he had been playing the tape recorder. So in fact you don’t need an investigation because you have the allegation and the allegation being admitted. Don’t you?”Furness: “When you say it needed to be established from an inquiry, it’s clear that Father Searson accepted that he had been playing the tape recorder. So in fact you don’t need an investigation because you have the allegation and the allegation being admitted. Don’t you?”
Pell: “Yes, I said at least an investigation.That would have been referred to some person in authority for effect of action.”Pell: “Yes, I said at least an investigation.That would have been referred to some person in authority for effect of action.”
Furness: “It was referred to someone in authority wasn’t it?Because it was referred from the vicar general to the Archbishop. It’s hard to imagine more authority than that.”Furness: “It was referred to someone in authority wasn’t it?Because it was referred from the vicar general to the Archbishop. It’s hard to imagine more authority than that.”
Updated
at 10.37pm GMT
10.13pm GMT10.13pm GMT
22:1322:13
Furness says a complaint about Searson was made to an educational consultant at the Catholic Education Office, Allan Dooley.Furness says a complaint about Searson was made to an educational consultant at the Catholic Education Office, Allan Dooley.
Furness says a mother phoned Dooley “because her daughter was concerned that he [Searson] made reference to her daughter’s weight and tickled her on the stomach and said ‘don’t ever look at yourself in the shower’.”Furness says a mother phoned Dooley “because her daughter was concerned that he [Searson] made reference to her daughter’s weight and tickled her on the stomach and said ‘don’t ever look at yourself in the shower’.”
Pell: “That is terrible.”Pell: “That is terrible.”
I can't imagine how the survivors sit through this. Case after case, this priest, that brother, this offence - it's overwhelming at timesI can't imagine how the survivors sit through this. Case after case, this priest, that brother, this offence - it's overwhelming at times
UpdatedUpdated
at 10.14pm GMTat 10.14pm GMT
10.09pm GMT10.09pm GMT
22:0922:09
Pell says child abuser Peter Searson was 'one of the most unpleasant priests I met'Pell says child abuser Peter Searson was 'one of the most unpleasant priests I met'
Furness asks Pell when he first became aware of parish priest Peter Searson who had two years worth of complaints against him including that he was sexually abusing children, had tortured animals and had brought a gun to school.Furness asks Pell when he first became aware of parish priest Peter Searson who had two years worth of complaints against him including that he was sexually abusing children, had tortured animals and had brought a gun to school.
Furness: “Now, when did Father Searson first come to your attention after you were made auxiliary bishop?”Furness: “Now, when did Father Searson first come to your attention after you were made auxiliary bishop?”
Pell: “I can’t recall exactly. I presume it would be the first time I visited the [Sunbury] parish, probably in connection with a confirmation.”Pell: “I can’t recall exactly. I presume it would be the first time I visited the [Sunbury] parish, probably in connection with a confirmation.”
Furness: “Do you recall now whether you had formed an early view of him?”Furness: “Do you recall now whether you had formed an early view of him?”
Pell: “Um, yes. He was a disconcerting man. In fact, at his worst moments he could be described as one of the most unpleasant priests that I’ve met, although he didn’t show that side of his personality to me very often. But I quickly learned that he was a difficult customer.”Pell: “Um, yes. He was a disconcerting man. In fact, at his worst moments he could be described as one of the most unpleasant priests that I’ve met, although he didn’t show that side of his personality to me very often. But I quickly learned that he was a difficult customer.”
UpdatedUpdated
at 10.28pm GMTat 10.28pm GMT
10.03pm GMT10.03pm GMT
22:0322:03
Furness is presenting Pell with historical documents detailing the abuses of parish priest Peter Searson. As previously mentioned, Searson had numerous complaints made against him to senior church figures, was never reported to police, and died without ever being charged.Furness is presenting Pell with historical documents detailing the abuses of parish priest Peter Searson. As previously mentioned, Searson had numerous complaints made against him to senior church figures, was never reported to police, and died without ever being charged.
Furness shows Pell a complaint “expressing the view that Searson was psychologically unsuitable to be a pastor or the pastor of that [Sunbury] parish”.Furness shows Pell a complaint “expressing the view that Searson was psychologically unsuitable to be a pastor or the pastor of that [Sunbury] parish”.
Documents show that senior church staff decided to constantly review the situation rather than report Searson, the commission hears.Documents show that senior church staff decided to constantly review the situation rather than report Searson, the commission hears.
“I think it was completely inadequate,” Pell says.“I think it was completely inadequate,” Pell says.
UpdatedUpdated
at 10.28pm GMTat 10.28pm GMT
9.57pm GMT9.57pm GMT
21:5721:57
Pell says when he was auxiliary bishop, he appointed Denis Hart as his vicar general and that “it was a very successful appointment”.Pell says when he was auxiliary bishop, he appointed Denis Hart as his vicar general and that “it was a very successful appointment”.
“I think his work as vicar general, especially in the matter of sexual abuse, constituted a very, very significant advance and improvement. I knew him a bit, I spoke to him off and on, I encouraged him. Father Hart was a formidably good administrator.”“I think his work as vicar general, especially in the matter of sexual abuse, constituted a very, very significant advance and improvement. I knew him a bit, I spoke to him off and on, I encouraged him. Father Hart was a formidably good administrator.”
UpdatedUpdated
at 10.28pm GMTat 10.28pm GMT
9.50pm GMT9.50pm GMT
21:5021:50
Furness is now questioning Pell about a parish priest, Peter Searson. The royal commission heard last year that complaints about Searson, made across two and a half years between 1984 and 1986, were never acted upon by senior parish staff, including the then archbishop Frank Little.Furness is now questioning Pell about a parish priest, Peter Searson. The royal commission heard last year that complaints about Searson, made across two and a half years between 1984 and 1986, were never acted upon by senior parish staff, including the then archbishop Frank Little.
Complaints came in from parents daily and ranged from concerns about Searson sexually abusing children to his bizarre way of running confession by having children sit on his lap. He also displayed strange behaviours such as carrying a gun to school and cruelty towards animals.Complaints came in from parents daily and ranged from concerns about Searson sexually abusing children to his bizarre way of running confession by having children sit on his lap. He also displayed strange behaviours such as carrying a gun to school and cruelty towards animals.
Pell says that Little “had a lot of information which he never made available to me” about Searson.Pell says that Little “had a lot of information which he never made available to me” about Searson.
“I discovered that somebody had prepared a list of infractions, a page and a half. I was never informed that this had been prepared and I was never informed about the variety and the seriousness of the problems in Sunbury.”“I discovered that somebody had prepared a list of infractions, a page and a half. I was never informed that this had been prepared and I was never informed about the variety and the seriousness of the problems in Sunbury.”
Searson died in 2009 without ever facing charges. The commission has previously heard he abused children in parishes and schools across three districts over more than a decade.Searson died in 2009 without ever facing charges. The commission has previously heard he abused children in parishes and schools across three districts over more than a decade.
George Pell: "I didn't feel any need to request access to files" (of priests in his region) when auxiliary priest of MelbourneGeorge Pell: "I didn't feel any need to request access to files" (of priests in his region) when auxiliary priest of Melbourne
UpdatedUpdated
at 10.29pm GMTat 10.29pm GMT
9.42pm GMT9.42pm GMT
21:4221:42
The commission hears that Archbishop Little, who knew priests were abusing children but moved them between parishes rather than report them to police or remove them from the church, resigned four years early.The commission hears that Archbishop Little, who knew priests were abusing children but moved them between parishes rather than report them to police or remove them from the church, resigned four years early.
Furness: “Now Archbishop Little ultimately resigned on grounds of ill health, didn’t he?”Furness: “Now Archbishop Little ultimately resigned on grounds of ill health, didn’t he?”
Pell: “That was what was said and he certainly had four or five different health problems.”Pell: “That was what was said and he certainly had four or five different health problems.”
Furness: “When you say that was said, are you suggesting that there were other reasons for his resignation other than what was said?”Furness: “When you say that was said, are you suggesting that there were other reasons for his resignation other than what was said?”
Pell: “I can’t give any book, chapter and verse on this but he resigned four years early and I suspect his situation would have paralleled that of Bishop Mulkearns, who resigned early, perhaps eight years early, and has pointed out that one of the reasons for this early resignation was problems with the treatment, the way he handled paedophilia cases.”Pell: “I can’t give any book, chapter and verse on this but he resigned four years early and I suspect his situation would have paralleled that of Bishop Mulkearns, who resigned early, perhaps eight years early, and has pointed out that one of the reasons for this early resignation was problems with the treatment, the way he handled paedophilia cases.”
Furness: “Bishop Mulkearns gave evidence that he decided for himself he wasn’t handling those matters well and therefore resigned. Was it the case with Archbishop Little that he decided for himself or that it was suggested to him that his handling of those complaints was deficient?”Furness: “Bishop Mulkearns gave evidence that he decided for himself he wasn’t handling those matters well and therefore resigned. Was it the case with Archbishop Little that he decided for himself or that it was suggested to him that his handling of those complaints was deficient?”
Pell: “Both the bishops would have had to offer their resignation. As I said, I can’t give book, chapter and verse but it would not surprise me if Archbishop Little was requested to put in his resignation. But he certainly was sick.”Pell: “Both the bishops would have had to offer their resignation. As I said, I can’t give book, chapter and verse but it would not surprise me if Archbishop Little was requested to put in his resignation. But he certainly was sick.”
Cardinal Pell says Archbishop Little allowed paeodophile priests inc. Peter Searson to remain in place and then be transferred #CARoyalCommCardinal Pell says Archbishop Little allowed paeodophile priests inc. Peter Searson to remain in place and then be transferred #CARoyalComm
#Pell says he was no friend of Arch Little, and didn't agree with how he handled things. #CARoyalComm#Pell says he was no friend of Arch Little, and didn't agree with how he handled things. #CARoyalComm
UpdatedUpdated
at 9.48pm GMTat 9.48pm GMT
9.36pm GMT
21:36
'Archbishop Little on some occasions did not act when he should have'
Furness is now turning her attention to Archbishop Frank Little.
The commission has previously heard evidence that Little, who held the position of Melbourne archbishop from 1974 to 1996, kept secret files full of “letters of complaint from all sorts of people, from parents especially, from offended people”.
Pell criticises Little, telling Furness; “Archbishop Little on some occasions did not act when he should have and certainly did not make appropriate information available to the personnel advisory board on some occasions.”
Furness: “Now are there other aspects of his handling such complaints that you’re critical of? You’ve described the provision of information.”
Pell: “Yes, allowing people to remain in place and sometimes transferring such people.”
Updated
at 9.47pm GMT
9.29pm GMT
21:29
Meanwhile, here are the front pages of the Victorian newspapers today.
Two strong front pages from Melbourne's leading newspapers. #Pell pic.twitter.com/NTrTZHPa5u
Updated
at 9.46pm GMT
9.27pm GMT
21:27
Pell is now referring to canon law, those laws which are enforced by the hierarchical authorities of the church. He’s detailing what canon law said about the authority certain roles within the church held.
“I think the first, and I’m not trying to be flippant, the first point of the canon law makes is, I think, that ultimately the auxiliary bishop has no authority to take decisions against the will of the archbishop,” Pell says.
As an aside - Pell regularly referencing Canon Law doesn't serve him well.
Cd. Pell. says "advising on personnel" is not mentioned in the role of Consultors in canon law. #CARoyalComm
Updated
at 9.46pm GMT
9.23pm GMT
21:23
Furness is now turning to Pell’s time in Melbourne. He was appointed parish priest of Mentone in 1987, and shortly after, he was appointed as an auxiliary bishop of the Archdiocese of Melbourne.
During his time as auxiliary bishop, in 1996, Pell introduced the Melbourne Response, which has previously been a strong focus of the royal commission.
The Melbourne Response scheme has been widely criticised by victims and their families throughout the course of the commission, for lacking independence, and for capping compensation payouts to victims at $75,000.
Furness asks Pell whether in his role as auxiliary bishop, he maintained a role in moving priests between parishes.
Pell: “Let me just say by way of background, I was an archbishop for 18 years and in the decisions that I took on personnel matters I would never think of attributing blame to either the consultors or the advisory board because I recognised that as archbishop they were my decisions.”
Furness: “Blame about what?”
Pell: “I ... would not believe it is appropriate if, for example, I had made a wrong decision, that something didn’t work out. I didn’t think it would have been appropriate to blame my advisers for the decision that I had taken.”
Updated
at 9.45pm GMT
9.17pm GMT
21:17
Furness is now turning her questioning to Brother Edward Dowlan. In 2015 Dowlan was convicted of 16 counts of indecent assault against 11 boys at four different Christian Brothers’ schools and was sentenced to six years and six months in prison, with a four-year non-parole period.
His victims gave evidence to the commission last week. Rather than being reported to police, Dowlan was moved from parish to parish.
Pell said he knew there were “was a generalised suggestion, accusation, there was nothing specific” about Dowlan’s abusing at the time.
At this point chair of the commission, Justice Peter McClellan, begins pressing Pell.
McClellan: “You said the matter was resolved by him being moved. Correct?”
Pell: “I think he was moved at the end of 74.”
McClellan: “Did it not cause you concern that a brother against whom you had heard rumours of sexual activity with children was dealt with by being moved from one place to another?”
Pell. “No. One, I didn’t know exactly what he was accused of but 40 years ago or more than 40 years ago I ... did not think that was unusual or inappropriate.”
McClellan: “You mean it was not inappropriate to move someone who might be moved to a different location where they could continue to offend but against different children?”
Pell: “No, I don’t believe that now and I didn’t believe that then. My whole assumption would – or was that the brothers would be dealing adequately with the matter. I was not aware then of their poor record which I learnt about later in dealing with such things. I presumed that when they shifted him they would have also arranged for some appropriate help.”
McClellan: “You made these assumptions but I gather that you didn’t make any inquiry to see whether your assumptions were correct?”
Pell: “No, I did not.”
McClellan: “Did you tell the bishop?”
Pell: “No, I did not.”
Updated
at 9.43pm GMT
9.09pm GMT
21:09
The evidence begins, day three
Counsel assisting, Gail Furness, is following up her line of questioning from yesterday about whether the topic of children being abused was ever brought up at consultors meetings. As one of the consultors, Pell provided advice to the then bishop of Ballarat, Ronald Mulkearns.
Remember yesterday, Furness told Pell it was “implausible” that he did not know of the abuse given the majority of the consultors, Mulkearns, parents, teachers and students did.
Furness: “Your intention was to give evidence that at those meetings nothing was said that could be interpreted as sexual activity, misconduct or interference with children in abroad sense?”
Pell: “That’s my recollection.”
Furness: “So can I ask you whether outside of those consultors meetings and in particular the 1982 meeting there was discussion among one or more of the consultors about what was known of complaints against [abuser and paedophile Gerald] Ridsdale?
Pell: “I wasn’t aware of such discussions.”
Updated
at 9.41pm GMT
9.03pm GMT
21:03
Child sexual abuse survivors in Rome to watch Pell’s evidence have called for a global campaign of tying ribbons to fences and letterboxes to show support for abuse victims.
Survivors of clergy abuse from Ballarat have created a new Loud Fence at the Domus Australia in Rome. @abcnews pic.twitter.com/UI6efMYxLk
The campaign, called Loud Fence, began in Ballarat, with survivors and their supporters tying thousands of colourful ribbons tied to the fences surrounding Catholic schools and churches in the town.
Following the last round of gruelling hearings in December, the ribbons began cropping up on fences and people have not stopped adding to them since in a show of support for the survivors.
8.48pm GMT
20:48
According to reports, conservative News Ltd media commentator, Andrew Bolt, has secured an exclusive interview with Pell, to be done once his evidence before the commission concludes.
Fairfax reports;
Viewers of Sky News Australia may have been shocked this week to find Andrew Bolt reporting on the royal commission into sex abuse from Rome.
The outspoken News Corp columnist has been sent to Rome as a Sky News contributor to cover Cardinal George Pell coming before the Royal Commission into Institutional Responses to Child Sexual Abuse.
He appeared on 2GB on Monday night with presenter Steve Price suggesting Bolt will interview Pell later in the week.
“Andrew, while in Rome, is hopeful and we’re assured this is going to happen for us later in the week, Andrew will have an exclusive, one-on-one interview with Cardinal Pell, the most senior Australian in the Vatican, and that will go to air on Friday morning as I understand it,” Price said before crossing to Bolt.
The Australian has confirmed the news of the exclusive interview.
Sky News contributor Andrew Bolt is in Rome. 'There has been an enormous hate campaign against George Pell'. https://t.co/Wp5JzkxYhI
8.35pm GMT
20:35
Emma and Katie Foster were repeatedly sexually abused by a Catholic priest when they were young girls at Sacred Heart primary school.
Their father, Anthony Foster, who is in Rome with a group of abuse survivors to watch Pell’s evidence, told media last night that he is “a broken man,” the ABC reports.
Anthony Foster says he's disappointed #Pell seemed unwilling to discuss better support for abuse survivors. @abcnews pic.twitter.com/h2rvpjaDbI
As a result of her abuse, Emma developed an eating disorder, became addicted to drugs and began self-harming.She died died at age 26 in 2008 after overdosing. Katie was hit by a drunk driver in 1999 and was left severely disabled, requiring 24-hour care.
The ABC reports;
Mr Foster confronted Cardinal Pell outside the hearing at the Hotel Quirinale, saying he had given up hope the Cardinal would fix the church’s so-called Melbourne Response to the abuse scandal.
“He held my hand for the whole duration of the chat that we had and I expressed to him that he was holding the hand of a broken man, and he put his other hand on me and tried to I suppose connect in some way, but I didn’t feel it,” Mr Foster said.
“Quest over. It was the smooth Cardinal Pell, not the Cardinal Pell we saw on the stand.”
You can read my interview with Foster, written before he gave evidence before the royal commission in 2014, here.
Updated
at 8.36pm GMT
8.22pm GMT
20:22
Welcome to our live coverage of the third day of Cardinal George Pell’s evidence before Australia’s royal commission into institutional responses into child sexual abuse.
It follows an explosive day of evidence yesterday led by questioning from counsel assisting, Gail Furness, with some of Pell’s responses to her questioning prompting gasps from those in the room on both the Sydney and Rome end of the proceedings.
For a recap of this, you can read Guardian writer David Marr’s excellent analysis here. Marr writes that Pell wasn’t much interested in stories of abuse by priests, which was lucky for his career;
From Pell’s evidence on the second day of his Roman cross-examination there emerged a picture of an ambitious and capable young priest who decided, early on, to steer clear of this dangerous issue.
On Monday Pell admitted knowing bits and pieces about some of the offenders and some of their crimes in Ballarat. He earned credibility for that. But on Tuesday he swore blind he knew nothing about the worst of them all: Ridsdale.
Fellow priests who knew the truth told him nothing. Complaints rife in several parishes never reached him. And his bishop, Ronald Mulkearns, never let him know about the complaints of Ridsdale’s abuse he had been fielding for a decade.
Pell called Mulkearns’ silence “a gross deception”.
But the devastating admission drawn from Pell by Gail Furness SC, counsel assisting the royal commission into institutional responses to child sexual abuse, was that he never bothered to ask.
“It was a sad story and of not much interest to me,” he told the commission. By the late 1970s he was a busy priest running the Catholic Institute of Education. “I had no reason to turn my mind to the evils Ridsdale had perpetrated.”
Furness will no doubt press Pell just as hard today, after yesterday telling Pell it was “implausible” that he, as a consultor to bishop Mulkearns and an assistant priest, did not know that Ridsdale was abusing children.
Melissa Davey with you here. We’re about half an hour away from the commission commencing. You can share your thoughts with me then on Twitter or on Facebook.
Stay with us.