This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/7258109.stm

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 6 Version 7
MPs vote for agency staff rights Labour MPs vote for agency rights
(about 2 hours later)
MPs have voted overwhelmingly in favour of proposals to give agency workers the same rights as permanent staff - but the government could still block it. Labour MPs have stepped up pressure on Gordon Brown over rights for agency workers ahead of a meeting on Monday.
Backbenchers rallied enough support to get a second reading for a private member's bill to give temporary workers the same rights as permanent staff.
Mr Brown has pledged an inquiry into the issue instead, but he is to meet union leaders to discuss a way forward.
More than one million people are employed via agencies, which means they do not get benefits such as sick pay.More than one million people are employed via agencies, which means they do not get benefits such as sick pay.
Labour MP Andrew Miller, who is proposing a bill to give them the same rights on pay and conditions, said it was "morally right" to change the law. MPs voted by 147 to 11 - a margin of 136 - to back Labour MP Andrew Miller's bill, proposing to give agency workers the same rights as permanent staff.
MPs voted by 147 to 11 - a margin of 136 - for the changes. Industry leaders oppose the bill saying it will lead to job losses and damage competitiveness.
Ministers are proposing an inquiry into the issue. But trade unions say Labour pledged to create a "level playing field" for agency workers in its 2005 manifesto.
'Doom merchants' 'Jam tomorrow'
The bill now goes on to its committee stage. It was helped by dozens of Labour backbenchers taking part in the debate, many of whom might normally have spent Friday in their constituencies. Tony Woodley, joint general secretary of Unite, said: "The message today sent by Labour MPs to their government could not be any clearer.
Proposing the bill, Mr Miller, MP for Ellesmere Port and Neston, said he was facing the same "doom merchants" who had opposed the introduction of the minimum wage. "Nothing less than primary legislation, delivered now, can quell the clamour that has come from MPs, the Labour Party's ruling body and from the wider labour movement.
"Hopefully today's vote has also quashed the idea of a commission to look into agency working.
"The evidence of the need for legislation now is overwhelming and we will not accept the promise of jam tomorrow."
Mr Miller's bill was helped on to the next stage by dozens of Labour backbenchers who took part in the debate, many of whom might normally have spent Friday in their constituencies.
Mr Miller, MP for Ellesmere Port and Neston, said he was facing the same "doom merchants" who had opposed the introduction of the minimum wage.
He told MPs: "It's in the best long-term interests of the economy to encourage employers to plan for the long term and establish a well-trained and well-motivated workforce.He told MPs: "It's in the best long-term interests of the economy to encourage employers to plan for the long term and establish a well-trained and well-motivated workforce.
HAVE YOUR SAY If employers are to be expected to fund holiday and sick pay for temps, then they will simply hire fewer of them Rxfisher, London Send us your commentsHAVE YOUR SAY If employers are to be expected to fund holiday and sick pay for temps, then they will simply hire fewer of them Rxfisher, London Send us your comments
"What the bill proposes is morally right. How can it be right for people to work alongside each other with the same skills doing precisely the same task and yet one category of employee is worth less than another?""What the bill proposes is morally right. How can it be right for people to work alongside each other with the same skills doing precisely the same task and yet one category of employee is worth less than another?"
Labour's Alun Michael added: "What's required is for ministers to put down their collective foot and make sure fairness is provided to agency workers."
Prime Minister Gordon Brown is proposing an inquiry to study agency workers' rights, rather than agreeing to legislation, and will meet unions on Monday to discuss the idea.
For the Conservatives, shadow energy minister Charles Hendry said the bill was "fundamentally flawed" and a "blunt instrument".For the Conservatives, shadow energy minister Charles Hendry said the bill was "fundamentally flawed" and a "blunt instrument".
He added: "The government is not leading here. It is simply treading water, hoping the issue will go away."
'Thriving''Thriving'
Mr Hendry said temporary work was "greatly valued by employers and many individuals" and praised the "thriving" agency sector, adding that many people chose to work in it for "positive" reasons, such as increased flexibility or to gain work experience. He said temporary work was "greatly valued by employers and many individuals" and praised the "thriving" agency sector, adding that many people chose to work in it for "positive" reasons, such as increased flexibility or to gain work experience.
Mr Miller's bill would give new rights to 1.4 million agency workers and the same pay and conditions as full-time employees.Mr Miller's bill would give new rights to 1.4 million agency workers and the same pay and conditions as full-time employees.
Some 130 MPs Labour and Lib Dem MPs have signed a Commons motion backing the proposal and many of them are expected vote in favour of it later to ensure it gets a second reading. But CBI deputy director general John Cridland told BBC Radio 4's Today programme the bill's approach was "scattergun" and that more discussion was needed.
The bill has the support of trade unions but is opposed by business leaders.
The Confederation of British Industry (CBI) said it could lead to job losses and make the country less competitive and the workforce less flexible.
Deputy director general John Cridland told BBC Radio 4's Today programme the bill's approach was "scattergun" and that more discussion was needed.
He said: "Rogue operators need to be dealt with. That's an issue of enforcement... coming down hard on people who give employers a bad name."
'Insecurity'
But Jack Dromey, deputy general secretary of the Unite union, said: "Agency workers don't go into five different employers five days running.
"Typically they will work for the same employer for six, nine, 12, 18 months, or even two years, in poorer conditions of employment."
Mr Dromey added there was a "growing number of agency workers living in semi-permanent insecurity".
In December, EU ministers failed to reach an agreement on legislation that would have given temporary workers, such as those employed through agencies, similar rights to permanent staff across Europe.In December, EU ministers failed to reach an agreement on legislation that would have given temporary workers, such as those employed through agencies, similar rights to permanent staff across Europe.
The UK opposed the proposals, saying it would damage the country's flexible labour market and hit jobs, but the legislation will be discussed again this year.The UK opposed the proposals, saying it would damage the country's flexible labour market and hit jobs, but the legislation will be discussed again this year.
The CBI warned that new rights for agency staff discussed by the EU employment ministers would cost up to 250,000 jobs.The CBI warned that new rights for agency staff discussed by the EU employment ministers would cost up to 250,000 jobs.
The union Unite is campaigning for equal rights for agency workers, saying there should be a "level playing field" with permanently employed people.