This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/sci/tech/7254540.stm

The article has changed 22 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 17 Version 18
Weather may delay satellite shot US missile hits 'toxic satellite'
(about 6 hours later)
The US might have to delay plans to shoot down a defunct spy satellite on Thursday because of bad weather. The US has successfully struck a disabled spy satellite with a missile fired from a warship in waters west of Hawaii, military officials say.
Waves in the Pacific are too big for US warships to get into a correct position to fire a missile at the spacecraft. Military operatives had only a 10-second window to hit the satellite - USA 193 - which lost control shortly after it was launched in December 2006.
The US Navy has been on standby to destroy the "spysat" before it enters Earth's atmosphere. Officials said they were worried fuel on board could pose a threat to humans.
The satellite, known as USA 193, stopped communicating and lost control a few hours after it was launched on 14 December 2006. But Russia suspects the operation was a cover to test anti-satellite technology under the US missile defence programme.
Officials say the shootdown was approved amid concerns that toxic hydrazine fuel on board could harm or kill humans if inhaled. The US denies the operation was a response to an anti-satellite test carried out by China last year, which prompted fears of a space arms race.
The US has denied the operation is a response to the anti-satellite test carried out by China last year, which prompted fears of a space arms race. But Russia has challenged America's rationale for carrying out the action. Precision needed
Once the space shuttle Atlantis had returned safely to Earth, the Pentagon announced the opening of a window of opportunity for it to try to shoot down USA 193. The BBC's Jonathan Beale in Washington says this operation was hugely ambitious - like trying to fire a missile through the eye of a needle.
The military plans to destroy the satellite with an SM-3 missile fired from the cruiser USS Lake Erie, which is posted on the western side of Hawaii along with the destroyers USS Decatur and USS Russell. The operation went ahead hours after the space shuttle Atlantis landed, removing it as a safety issue for the military.
Official notices have been issued to aviators and mariners to remain clear of a section of the Pacific Ocean from 0230 to 0500 GMT on Thursday. BROKEN SATELLITE Owner: National Reconnaissance OfficeMission: ClassifiedLaunched: 14 Dec 2006Weight: 2,300 kg (5,000lbs)1,134kg (2,500lbs) could survive re-entryCarrying hydrazine thruster fuel
Precision strike The satellite - believed by some commentators to be a radar imaging reconnaissance satellite - was passing about 130 miles (210km) over the Pacific.
The US intends to intercept the 2,300kg (5,000lbs) spacecraft - believed by some commentators to be a radar imaging reconnaissance satellite - when it is at an altitude of 240km above the ground. Earlier the military said it would use an SM-3 missile fired from the cruiser USS Lake Erie, which is posted on the western side of Hawaii along with the destroyers USS Decatur and USS Russell.
Hitting USA 193 just at the edge of the Earth's atmosphere minimizes the amount of debris that would remain in space. But it is not yet known how successful the operation was - the missile needs to pierce the bus-sized satellite's fuel tank, containing more than 450kg (1,000lbs) of toxic hydrazine, which would otherwise be expected to survive re-entry.
BROKEN SATELLITE Owner: National Reconnaissance OfficeMission: ClassifiedLaunched: 14 Dec 2006Weight: 2,300 kg (5,000lbs)1,134kg (2,500lbs) could survive re-entryCarrying hydrazine thruster fuel But the missile, launched from a Navy cruiser, will have to do better than just striking the bus-sized spacecraft. The Pentagon said confirmation that the fuel tank has been hit should be available within 24 hours.
It needs to pierce the satellite's spherical fuel tank, containing more than 450kg (1,000lbs) of toxic hydrazine, which would otherwise be expected to survive re-entry. US officials said without an attempt to destroy the fuel tank, and with the satellite's thermal control system gone, the fuel would now be frozen solid, allowing the tank to resist the heat of re-entry.
With the satellite's thermal control system gone, the fuel would now be frozen solid, allowing the tank to resist the heat of re-entry. If the tank were to land intact, it could leak toxic gas over an area the size of two football pitches. If the tank were to land intact, it could leak toxic gas over a wide area - harming or kill humans if inhaled, officials had warned.
US General James Cartwright, vice-chairman of the joint chiefs of staff, said exposure to the fuel would have similar effects to inhaling chlorine or ammonia - a burning sensation in the lungs and, if too close and too much, possibly death. Debris
Window of opportunity
By rupturing the one metre-wide tank, the military hopes to disperse as much hydrazine as possible in space before the National Reconaissance Office (NRO) "bird" falls to Earth.
Officials expect that over 50% of the debris will fall to Earth within the first 15 hours after the strike - or within its first two revolutions of Earth.Officials expect that over 50% of the debris will fall to Earth within the first 15 hours after the strike - or within its first two revolutions of Earth.
General Cartwright (r) will advise on when to take the shotGen Cartwright, and Gen Kevin Chilton, head of Strategic Command, will advise US defence secretary Robert Gates on exactly when to launch the missile. USA 193 lost control a few hours after launch on a Delta II rocket
The mission could go forward on any day until 29 February, when the satellite is projected to have re-entered the atmosphere, making it virtually impossible to attempt to hit with a missile. Left to its own devices, about half of the spacecraft would have been expected to survive the blazing descent through the atmosphere, scattering debris in a defined "corridor" which runs across the Earth's surface.
Left to its own devices, about half of the spacecraft would be expected to survive the blazing descent through the atmosphere, scattering debris in a defined "corridor" which runs across the Earth's surface.
Professor Richard Crowther, a space debris expert with the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), said that if struck with the missile, about 25% of USA 193 is likely to survive the fall to Earth.Professor Richard Crowther, a space debris expert with the Science and Technology Facilities Council (STFC), said that if struck with the missile, about 25% of USA 193 is likely to survive the fall to Earth.
"The smaller the debris is the more likely you are to get burn-through. So if you fragment something before re-entry, less mass will survive to hit the Earth," he told BBC News."The smaller the debris is the more likely you are to get burn-through. So if you fragment something before re-entry, less mass will survive to hit the Earth," he told BBC News.
Russian concerns Russian suspicion
But Russia's defence ministry has effectively branded the US operation a cover for testing an anti-satellite weapon.But Russia's defence ministry has effectively branded the US operation a cover for testing an anti-satellite weapon.
"Essentially, speculations about the danger of the satellite hide preparations for the classical testing of an anti-satellite weapon," a statement reported by Itar-Tass news agency said. The Russian defence ministry argued that various countries' spacecraft had crashed to Earth in the past, with many using toxic fuel on board, but that this had never before merited "extraordinary measures".
USA 193 lost control a few hours after launch on a Delta II rocketThe Russian defence ministry argued that various countries' spacecraft had crashed to Earth in the past, with many using toxic fuel on board, but that this had never before merited "extraordinary measures".
Last year, China carried out a test using a ground-based ballistic missile to destroy a satellite in space, prompting international alarm and fears of a space arms race.Last year, China carried out a test using a ground-based ballistic missile to destroy a satellite in space, prompting international alarm and fears of a space arms race.
On Tuesday, a US State Department spokesman stressed that the action was meant to protect people from the hazardous fuel and was not a weapons test.On Tuesday, a US State Department spokesman stressed that the action was meant to protect people from the hazardous fuel and was not a weapons test.
Gen Cartwright has also denied claims that the main aim of the operation was to destroy secret components on USA 193. The US government has also denied claims that the main aim of the operation was to destroy secret components on USA 193.
He explained that classified parts would be burned up in the atmosphere and, in any case, that would not be a reason for shooting down the satellite. Officials say classified parts would be burned up in the atmosphere and, in any case, that would not be a reason for shooting down the satellite.
SATELLITE DESTRUCTION PLAN 1 SM-3 missile launched from a US Navy cruiser in Pacific Ocean2 The three-stage missile heads for collision location, where the relative "closing" speed will be 10km/s (22,000mph)3 Satellite reaches desired altitude of 240km (130 nautical miles), close to edge of atmosphere4 Missile makes contact and breaks fuel tank, freeing hydrazine into space5 Debris scattered over hundreds of kilometresSATELLITE DESTRUCTION PLAN 1 SM-3 missile launched from a US Navy cruiser in Pacific Ocean2 The three-stage missile heads for collision location, where the relative "closing" speed will be 10km/s (22,000mph)3 Satellite reaches desired altitude of 240km (130 nautical miles), close to edge of atmosphere4 Missile makes contact and breaks fuel tank, freeing hydrazine into space5 Debris scattered over hundreds of kilometres
Paul.Rincon-INTERNET@bbc.co.ukPaul.Rincon-INTERNET@bbc.co.uk