This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/live/2015/jul/09/bill-shorten-faces-a-second-day-at-the-trade-union-royal-commission-politics-live

The article has changed 16 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Bill Shorten faces a second day at the trade union royal commission – politics live Bill Shorten faces a second day at the trade union royal commission – politics live
(35 minutes later)
10.14am AEST01:14
Daniel Hurst
Just for clarity, the $300,000 is total payments from Thiess John Holland to AWU Victoria and the national office between 2005 and 2008.
Updated at 10.15am AEST
10.09am AEST01:09
Shorten begins his evidence
Counsel assisting Jeremy Stoljar is opening his line of questioning on the joint venture between Thiess and John Holland. This is the East Link project. A bundle of documents has just been dropped.
Stoljar is asking Shorten about a $300,000 payment to the AWU in Victoria. Stoljar is asking whether the AWU in Victoria did research into back strain in the period leading up to 18 January 2006. The witness doesn’t recall this specific piece of work.
Shorten notes back strain is a big issue in civil construction. Stoljar doesn’t doubt it but he wants to know about these specific invoices.
Q: Is this a bogus invoice claiming for work never done?
Bill Shorten:
I would never be party to issuing bogus invoices, full stop.
9.57am AEST00:57
Having worked through the substance of yesterday, and shared various reflections on it, just a thought about tactics before we blast into rapid fire element of the day.
Shorten’s approach to the commission has been to play the whole process in a low key fashion, cooperating with the Stoljar questioning, biting back only when provoked and then in low key fashion.
Outside the commission, Labor has been attacking the process as stacked against the opposition, a witch hunt and all the rest. One option Shorten would have is to bring some of that critique inside the proceedings today rather than maintaining the current separation between the way he’s presenting and the political attack going on outside.
It’s a more risky way to go, and I make no predictions about it whatsoever. I’m just noting there are different ways you could approach the proceedings.
Underway in a minute now. Refresh your beverages.
9.37am AEST00:379.37am AEST00:37
Let me point you in the direction of a couple of good analytical pieces besides the one posted by Gay Alcorn covering Wednesday’s hearing.Let me point you in the direction of a couple of good analytical pieces besides the one posted by Gay Alcorn covering Wednesday’s hearing.
The gentleman of Australian political journalism, Age political editor Michael Gordon, says Bill Shorten held up well in the morning onslaught but the exhausting nature of the grilling took its toll in the afternoon. Gordon also highlights an almost surreal edge to the #turc inquisition – a process set up by a Coalition government (who deregulated the industry system and campaigned against union militancy) now taking a moderate union official to task. The gentleman of Australian political journalism, Age political editor Michael Gordon, says Bill Shorten held up well in the morning onslaught but the exhausting nature of the grilling took its toll in the afternoon. Gordon also highlights an almost surreal edge to the #turc inquisition – a process set up by a Coalition government (who deregulated the industrial relations system and campaigned against union militancy) now taking a moderate union official to task.
The more substantial question is whether Mr Shorten acted in the best interests of his members when he led the Australian Workers Union and, while it is premature to draw conclusions, there is an almost surreal edge to this inquisition. Here is the party that wanted to abolish the no-disadvantage test for enterprise agreements taking Mr Shorten to task for allegedly failing to uphold it in one instance.The more substantial question is whether Mr Shorten acted in the best interests of his members when he led the Australian Workers Union and, while it is premature to draw conclusions, there is an almost surreal edge to this inquisition. Here is the party that wanted to abolish the no-disadvantage test for enterprise agreements taking Mr Shorten to task for allegedly failing to uphold it in one instance.
John Lyons at The Australian notes that whether or not the royal commission is a witch-hunt, it remains Shorten’s big test. Lyons thinks the Unibilt donation knocked Shorten about in the witness box. John Lyons at the Australian notes that whether or not the royal commission is a witch-hunt, it remains Shorten’s big test. Lyons thinks the Unibuilt donation knocked Shorten about in the witness box.
(Shorten’s) former ministerial colleague Greg Combet, looked on anxiously as an often defensive Shorten sought to explain away the many unsavoury elements of the Unibilt deal. Was it not a breathtaking conflict of interest that Unibilt was paying for Shorten’s campaign direct­or at a time when Unibilt was about to begin negotiations with the AWU for a new enterprise bargaining agreement? Cue a nervous reach for a glass of water, before Shorten admitted that he had not initially revealed this donation-in-kind in his declaration to the Australian Electoral Commission, only rectifying this days before he was about to appear before the commission. [Shorten’s] former ministerial colleague Greg Combet looked on anxiously as an often defensive Shorten sought to explain away the many unsavoury elements of the Unibilt deal. Was it not a breathtaking conflict of interest that Unibilt was paying for Shorten’s campaign direct­or at a time when Unibilt was about to begin negotiations with the AWU for a new enterprise bargaining agreement? Cue a nervous reach for a glass of water, before Shorten admitted that he had not initially revealed this donation-in-kind in his declaration to the Australian Electoral Commission, only rectifying this days before he was about to appear before the commission.
It was the most damaging mome­nt for Shorten in what was a day-long, bruising battle with Stoljar.It was the most damaging mome­nt for Shorten in what was a day-long, bruising battle with Stoljar.
Updated at 9.47am AEST
9.20am AEST00:209.20am AEST00:20
Good morning and welcome to our live coverage of Bill Shorten’s second day in the witness box at the trade union royal commission. Shorten is giving evidence about the period he was secretary of the Australian Workers’ Union Victorian branch – from 1998 to 2006. Shorten also served as the union’s national secretary from 2001 until he entered federal parliament in 2007.Good morning and welcome to our live coverage of Bill Shorten’s second day in the witness box at the trade union royal commission. Shorten is giving evidence about the period he was secretary of the Australian Workers’ Union Victorian branch – from 1998 to 2006. Shorten also served as the union’s national secretary from 2001 until he entered federal parliament in 2007.
Before we launch into #turc day two, let’s recap the highlights from day one.Before we launch into #turc day two, let’s recap the highlights from day one.
So that was Wednesday in the witness box. A couple of additional resources to help you prepare for today.So that was Wednesday in the witness box. A couple of additional resources to help you prepare for today.
If you need to walk back a couple of steps from the specifics of Wednesday, and read up on what this inquisition is all about, you can find a very useful primer by my colleague Daniel Hurst here. Still in primer territory, I linked to this yesterday and will again today. Our colleagues at Fairfax have produced a list of questions Shorten needs to answer.If you need to walk back a couple of steps from the specifics of Wednesday, and read up on what this inquisition is all about, you can find a very useful primer by my colleague Daniel Hurst here. Still in primer territory, I linked to this yesterday and will again today. Our colleagues at Fairfax have produced a list of questions Shorten needs to answer.
If you would like to try and decode Wednesday a little further and contemplate some bigger systemic issues about fundraising and political culture highlighted by Shorten’s testimony at the royal commission, another colleague, Gay Alcorn, has written a terrific analysis which you can find here.If you would like to try and decode Wednesday a little further and contemplate some bigger systemic issues about fundraising and political culture highlighted by Shorten’s testimony at the royal commission, another colleague, Gay Alcorn, has written a terrific analysis which you can find here.
If you’d just like some comic relief, you can find First Dog on The Moon’s depiction of the opposition leader, Stiff Breezington, in the #turc witness box, here.If you’d just like some comic relief, you can find First Dog on The Moon’s depiction of the opposition leader, Stiff Breezington, in the #turc witness box, here.
Shorten is due to take the stand at 10am.Shorten is due to take the stand at 10am.
We’ll continue to read in gently until he appears. The Politics Live comments thread is now open for your business, and you can find me, today, and most days, and some evenings and weekends, depending on how much my family wants to talk to me, on the Twits @murpharooWe’ll continue to read in gently until he appears. The Politics Live comments thread is now open for your business, and you can find me, today, and most days, and some evenings and weekends, depending on how much my family wants to talk to me, on the Twits @murpharoo
Buckle in young #turcs. Here comes B-Day 2.0Buckle in young #turcs. Here comes B-Day 2.0
Updated at 9.49am AEST