This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/07/world-health-organisation-lacks-capacity-culture-react-crises-ebola-report

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
WHO incapable of reacting to crises such as Ebola, says report WHO incapable of reacting to crises such as Ebola, says report
(35 minutes later)
The World Health Organisation lacks the capacity and internal culture to mount an effective response to an epidemic such as the Ebola outbreak in west Africa, according to a searing report that also blames governments for failing to support the group.The World Health Organisation lacks the capacity and internal culture to mount an effective response to an epidemic such as the Ebola outbreak in west Africa, according to a searing report that also blames governments for failing to support the group.
The report, led by Dame Barbara Stocking, the former head of Oxfam, was commissioned by the WHO’s executive. It says the organisation was too slow in its response to the Ebola epidemic and that it was under-funded. The report, led by Dame Barbara Stocking, a former head of Oxfam, was commissioned by the WHO’s executive. It says the organisation was too slow in its response to the Ebola epidemic and that it was under-funded.
Related: UN special envoy says Ebola flare-ups could continue for some timeRelated: UN special envoy says Ebola flare-ups could continue for some time
“The panel considers that WHO does not currently possess the capacity or organisational culture to deliver a full emergency public health response,” said the report. “The panel considers that WHO does not currently possess the capacity or organisational culture to deliver a full emergency public health response,” the report says.
More than 11,000 people have died in the latest outbreak of Ebola, which began spreading in late 2013. Some have argued for replacing the WHO, but the panel said it must still take the lead in world health disasters. The WHO must “re-establish its pre-eminence as the guardian of global public health”, it says, but that will mean major changes to the way it works. More than 11,000 people have died in the latest outbreak of Ebola, which began spreading in late 2013. Some have argued for replacing the WHO, but the panel said it must still take the lead in world health disasters.
Part of the blame for its inadequacies is placed at the door of member states, which did not fulfil their responsibilities under the WHO’s international health regulations. They are required to collect data and carry out surveillance to pick up infectious disease outbreaks at an early stage but they failed, said the report. The WHO must “re-establish its pre-eminence as the guardian of global public health”, it says, but that will mean major changes to the way it works.
Others violated the regulations by imposing bans on travel to the affected west African nations – Sierra Leone, Liberia and Guinea. These and other measures “significantly interfered with international travel, causing negative political, economic and social consequences for the affected countries,” the report said. Part of the blame for its inadequacies is placed at the door of member states, which the report says have not fulfilled their responsibilities under the WHO’s international health regulations. They are required to collect data and carry out surveillance to pick up infectious disease outbreaks at an early stage but they failed, the report says.
But the WHO itself is blamed for “significant and unjustifiable delays” in declaring a public health emergency, which belatedly fired the starting gun for the major international response to Ebola. Others violated the regulations by imposing bans on travel to the affected west African nations – Sierra Leone, Liberia and Guinea. These and other measures “significantly interfered with international travel, causing negative political, economic and social consequences for the affected countries,” the report says.
The WHO itself is criticised for “significant and unjustifiable delays” in declaring a public health emergency, which belatedly fired the starting gun for the international response to Ebola.
The general flouting of the rules put in place to keep the world safe from infectious disease cannot continue, according the report. “The panel considers this situation, in which the global community does not take seriously its obligations under the international health regulations (2005) – a legally binding document – to be untenable.”The general flouting of the rules put in place to keep the world safe from infectious disease cannot continue, according the report. “The panel considers this situation, in which the global community does not take seriously its obligations under the international health regulations (2005) – a legally binding document – to be untenable.”
Organisational and financial issues must be addressed immediately, it warned. Less than 25% of the WHO’s budget comes from core funds contributed by member states and there are no core funds for emergency response. “The longstanding policy of zero nominal growth policy for assessed contributions has dangerously eroded the purchasing power of WHO’s resources, further diminishing the organisation’s emergency capacity,” said the report. It recommends a 5% increase. Organisational and financial issues must be addressed immediately, it says. Less than 25% of the WHO’s budget comes from core funds contributed by member states and there are no core funds for emergency response. “The longstanding policy of zero nominal growth policy for assessed contributions has dangerously eroded the purchasing power of WHO’s resources, further diminishing the organisation’s emergency capacity,” the report says. It recommends a 5% increase.
It said there should be incentives for countries to declare an emergency – at the moment many would be unwilling because of the dire impact on trade and the economy – and “disincentives” for countries that impose travel bans and other measures that interfere with trade. It says there should be incentives for countries to declare an emergency – at the moment many would be unwilling because of the dire impact on trade and the economy – and disincentives to countries imposing travel bans and other measures that interfere with trade.
Related: Ebola crisis brutally exposed failures of the aid system, says MSF | Lisa O'CarrollRelated: Ebola crisis brutally exposed failures of the aid system, says MSF | Lisa O'Carroll
It recommended that there be a WHO centre for emergency preparedness and response which can take the lead in avoiding and dealing with outbreaks, overseen by an independent board, and that the independence of WHO’s country officers be reinforced. “At country level, the WHO representative must have an independent voice and be assured of the full support of the regional director and the director-general, if challenged by governments,” said the report. It recommends that there be a WHO centre for emergency preparedness and response which can take the lead in avoiding and dealing with outbreaks, overseen by an independent board, and that the independence of WHO’s country officers be reinforced.
“At country level, the WHO representative must have an independent voice and be assured of the full support of the regional director and the director-general, if challenged by governments,” the report says.
Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust, said: “The recommendations outlined by the independent panel should give WHO the mandate it needs to lead the global response to future health crises. The proposal to establish a WHO centre for emergency preparedness and response is encouraging.Jeremy Farrar, director of the Wellcome Trust, said: “The recommendations outlined by the independent panel should give WHO the mandate it needs to lead the global response to future health crises. The proposal to establish a WHO centre for emergency preparedness and response is encouraging.
“It’s essential that this new body is accountable and can show leadership in the face of emerging health threats, with the authority and independence to act quickly when needed. The support of the global community is also crucial if we are to avert another catastrophe on the scale of Ebola.”“It’s essential that this new body is accountable and can show leadership in the face of emerging health threats, with the authority and independence to act quickly when needed. The support of the global community is also crucial if we are to avert another catastrophe on the scale of Ebola.”