This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/uks-structurally-unfair-asylum-appeals-process-suspended-by-court-after-legal-challenge-10347724.html

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
UK's 'structurally unfair' asylum appeals process suspended by court after legal challenge UK's 'structurally unfair' asylum appeals process suspended by court after legal challenge
(about 1 hour later)
A court has suspended the UK’s fast-track asylum appeals system after a legal challenge by a charity that says it is “structurally unfair”.A court has suspended the UK’s fast-track asylum appeals system after a legal challenge by a charity that says it is “structurally unfair”.
Lawyers from Action Detention argued that it was unlawful for asylum seekers to be detained during their appeals process even when there was a good chance their case could be valid.Lawyers from Action Detention argued that it was unlawful for asylum seekers to be detained during their appeals process even when there was a good chance their case could be valid.
The ruling means that the Home Office can no longer detain asylum seekers during their appeal simply for claiming asylum, and that the system’s tight deadlines can no longer be imposed upon applicants.The ruling means that the Home Office can no longer detain asylum seekers during their appeal simply for claiming asylum, and that the system’s tight deadlines can no longer be imposed upon applicants.
The High Court had previously ordered the appeals process to be suspended, but the Court of Appeal had said the Government could keep the system running while an appeal by ministers was heart. The High Court had previously ordered the appeals process to be suspended, but the Court of Appeal had said the Government could keep the system running while an appeal by ministers was heard.
The appeal court has now agreed that the system should be suspended, however.The appeal court has now agreed that the system should be suspended, however.
Speaking from outside the Court of Appeal today Jerome Phelps, the director of Action Detention, said the Government should develop a new approach to asylum appeals.Speaking from outside the Court of Appeal today Jerome Phelps, the director of Action Detention, said the Government should develop a new approach to asylum appeals.
“We are delighted that asylum-seekers will no longer face a detained appeals process that is so unfair as to be unlawful.  It is unfortunate that it has taken so many court rulings to finally suspend this deeply flawed process,” he said.“We are delighted that asylum-seekers will no longer face a detained appeals process that is so unfair as to be unlawful.  It is unfortunate that it has taken so many court rulings to finally suspend this deeply flawed process,” he said.
“People seeking protection from war and persecution deserve better from British justice.   We hope that the government will take this opportunity to reflect and develop a different approach that is fair.”“People seeking protection from war and persecution deserve better from British justice.   We hope that the government will take this opportunity to reflect and develop a different approach that is fair.”
The charity says many applicants processed through the fast-track scheme are from countries with a recent history of armed conflict, including Afghanistan and Sri Lanka.The charity says many applicants processed through the fast-track scheme are from countries with a recent history of armed conflict, including Afghanistan and Sri Lanka.
The current system has been in place for a decade.The current system has been in place for a decade.
The Refugee Council, a charity that works to support asylum seekers, said detaining people on the basis that they were asking for protection was not right.The Refugee Council, a charity that works to support asylum seekers, said detaining people on the basis that they were asking for protection was not right.
"This ruling is a very welcome, though painfully long overdue, recognition that the Detained Fast Track is a dangerous caricature of justice," the charity's chief executive Maurice Wren said."This ruling is a very welcome, though painfully long overdue, recognition that the Detained Fast Track is a dangerous caricature of justice," the charity's chief executive Maurice Wren said.
"Today the courts have acknowledged the unlawfulness of a system that for administrative and political convenience undermines justice and puts lives at risk."Today the courts have acknowledged the unlawfulness of a system that for administrative and political convenience undermines justice and puts lives at risk.
"The Government must now accept that detaining people because they asked for refugee protection in the UK is inhumane and deeply unjust.""The Government must now accept that detaining people because they asked for refugee protection in the UK is inhumane and deeply unjust."
The Ministry of Justice was contacted to comment on this story. The Home Office said it was preparing a response.The Ministry of Justice was contacted to comment on this story. The Home Office said it was preparing a response.