This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jun/15/south-africa-to-fight-omar-al-bashirs-arrest-warrant-sudan

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Sudan says president Omar al-Bashir has left South Africa Sudan says president Omar al-Bashir has left South Africa
(about 1 hour later)
Sudan’s state minister says President Omar al-Bashir has left Johannesburg, as a South African court prepared to rule over an international warrant for his arrest. The Sudanese president, Omar al-Bashir, is reported to have flown out of South Africa in defiance of the country’s high court, which was considering whether to enforce an international warrant for his arrest.
The South African government had said it would argue against a domestic court application to force the arrest of Bashir, who has been indicted by the international criminal court. The abrupt departure, announced by a Sudanese official, came amid urgent calls from the United Nations general secretary, Ban Ki-moon, the EU and the US for Bashir to be detained.
Bashir, who was attending an African Union summit in South Africa, is accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity in an ICC arrest warrant over atrocities committed in the Darfur conflict. His flight, if confirmed, will be a severe setback to the authority of the international criminal court. The ICC has issued two warrants seeking the Sudanese leader’s arrest and accusing him of war crimes and crimes against humanity for atrocities committed in the Darfur conflict.
On Sunday, Judge Hans Fabricius barred Bashir from leaving South Africa until he had decided on an application by a human rights group calling for Bashir’s arrest. As Bashir’s plane took off from Waterkloof military airport outside Pretoria, the local high court was hearing arguments over an application that would have forced the South African government to arrest him.
Bashir had travelled to South Africa for a summit of African Union leaders that was chaired by Zimbabwe’s president, Robert Mugabe, who has urged African leaders to pull out of the ICC.
African states accuse the court, which is based in The Hague, of only targeting political leaders on their continent and failing to bring those responsible for war crimes in the Middle East and elsewhere to justice.
Human rights groups, however, were outraged that Bashir could openly defy arrest. The Southern Africa Litigation Centre had filed an urgent application to overturn a government decision to grant immunity to all delegates attending the African Union summit.
On Sunday, Judge Hans Fabricius in South Africa’s high court had issued an interim order barring Bashir from leaving the country. The South African government had said it would argue against the court application on the grounds that it had granted delegates at the conference immunity.
Related: Omar al-Bashir: conflict in Darfur is my responsibilityRelated: Omar al-Bashir: conflict in Darfur is my responsibility
The judge’s hearing resumed at 09.30GMT on Monday but was adjourned for an hour so the court could study documents submitted by the state. The judge’s hearing resumed at 9.30am GMT on Monday but was adjourned for an hour so the court could study documents submitted by the state.
Caroline James, the lawyer for rights group the Southern African Litigation Centre, earlier said she believed there was a real risk Bashir would soon leave the country and the application for his arrest would become “mute”.
South Africa’s government has challenged the court’s decision because it has given immunity to Bashir and all other delegates attending the AU summit.
“We will meticulously argue for the application to be dismissed,” Mthunzi Mhaga, spokesman for the justice ministry, told local television station ENCA.“We will meticulously argue for the application to be dismissed,” Mthunzi Mhaga, spokesman for the justice ministry, told local television station ENCA.
Sudanese officials said the court order had no value because Bashir was invited by the South African government.Sudanese officials said the court order had no value because Bashir was invited by the South African government.
“[The] world stood [with] South Africa to fight apartheid but it stands for impunity for mass murder of Africans,” Kenneth Roth, director of Human Rights Watch, said on Twitter.
“South Africa has shamefully flouted ICC and domestic court to free man wanted for mass murder of Africans,” he added.
As many as 300,000 people have died in the Darfur conflict and 2 million have been displaced, the United Nations says.As many as 300,000 people have died in the Darfur conflict and 2 million have been displaced, the United Nations says.
On Sunday, South Africa criticised the ICC for unfairly focusing its indictments on African leaders and said the Hague court was “no longer useful”.On Sunday, South Africa criticised the ICC for unfairly focusing its indictments on African leaders and said the Hague court was “no longer useful”.
The response has put South Africa on a collision course with western leaders as the US State Department and the United Nations criticised Jacob Zuma’s government.The response has put South Africa on a collision course with western leaders as the US State Department and the United Nations criticised Jacob Zuma’s government.
“The international criminal court’s warrant for the arrest of President al-Bashir on charges of crimes against humanity and war crimes is a matter I take extremely seriously,” the UN’s secretary-general, Ban Ki-moon, told reporters in Geneva. “The authority of the ICC must be respected and its decision implemented.” “The international criminal court’s warrant for the arrest of President al-Bashir on charges of crimes against humanity and war crimes is a matter I take extremely seriously,” the UN’s Ban told reporters in Geneva. “The authority of the ICC must be respected and its decision implemented.”
South Africa is an ICC signatory and therefore obliged to implement arrest warrants but the ruling African National Congress has said it wants the court’s statutes to be reviewed to ensure a “fair and independent court”.South Africa is an ICC signatory and therefore obliged to implement arrest warrants but the ruling African National Congress has said it wants the court’s statutes to be reviewed to ensure a “fair and independent court”.
The ICC issued arrest warrants for Bashir in 2009 and 2010. He has long rejected the court’s authority.The ICC issued arrest warrants for Bashir in 2009 and 2010. He has long rejected the court’s authority.