This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/11/world/europe/ludvik-vaculik-influential-czech-writer-and-dissident-dies-at-88.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Ludvik Vaculik, Influential Czech Writer and Dissident, Dies at 88 Ludvik Vaculik, Influential Czech Writer and Dissident, Dies at 88
(1 day later)
Ludvik Vaculik, a leading Czech writer, dissident and intellectual, whose calls for human rights and trenchant critique of Communism helped foster a short-lived period of freedom that culminated in the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968, has died. He was 88.Ludvik Vaculik, a leading Czech writer, dissident and intellectual, whose calls for human rights and trenchant critique of Communism helped foster a short-lived period of freedom that culminated in the Soviet invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968, has died. He was 88.
The Czech news media announced his death on June 6 but did not say when or where he had died or provide the cause.The Czech news media announced his death on June 6 but did not say when or where he had died or provide the cause.
Mr. Vaculik was a key figure in the Czechoslovak underground publishing world in the 1970s and ’80s, helping to give voice to other dissident writers in the country who were banned by the government. He himself was censored for more than two decades but still managed to write a series of influential articles, books and novels, including “The Guinea Pigs” (1970), “The Czech Dreambook” (1980) and “A Cup of Coffee With My Interrogator” (1987), which used humor and a developed sense of the absurd to distill the struggles of living under despotic circumstances.Mr. Vaculik was a key figure in the Czechoslovak underground publishing world in the 1970s and ’80s, helping to give voice to other dissident writers in the country who were banned by the government. He himself was censored for more than two decades but still managed to write a series of influential articles, books and novels, including “The Guinea Pigs” (1970), “The Czech Dreambook” (1980) and “A Cup of Coffee With My Interrogator” (1987), which used humor and a developed sense of the absurd to distill the struggles of living under despotic circumstances.
Perhaps most notable among Mr. Vaculik’s achievements was a concise and eloquent political manifesto in 1968 called “Two Thousand Words,” in which he critiqued the moral, economic and political decay wrought by the Communist state and called for an expansion of democracy and human rights.Perhaps most notable among Mr. Vaculik’s achievements was a concise and eloquent political manifesto in 1968 called “Two Thousand Words,” in which he critiqued the moral, economic and political decay wrought by the Communist state and called for an expansion of democracy and human rights.
The document, which received wide support among everyday Czechs and leading intellectuals, helped buttress the democratic changes that were already being promulgated by Alexander Dubcek, the Czechoslovak leader at the time, whose call for “socialism with a human face” led to a momentary flourishing of artistic and personal freedom known as the Prague Spring. The document, which received wide support among everyday Czechs and leading intellectuals, helped buttress the democratic changes that were already being promulgated by Alexander Dubcek, the Czechoslovak leader at the time. Dubcek’s call for “socialism with a human face” led to a momentary flourishing of artistic and personal freedom known as the Prague Spring.
In the manifesto, Mr. Vaculik, who had already been expelled from the Communist Party after criticizing it at a writers’ congress in 1967, lamented that under Communism the country had descended into apathy and selfishness and had “reached a point where its spiritual health and character were both ruined.”In the manifesto, Mr. Vaculik, who had already been expelled from the Communist Party after criticizing it at a writers’ congress in 1967, lamented that under Communism the country had descended into apathy and selfishness and had “reached a point where its spiritual health and character were both ruined.”
The manifesto, which was published on June 27, 1968, in several leading newspapers, helped fan a robust backlash in the Kremlin against the liberalization of Czechoslovakia, resulting in an invasion by Warsaw Pact troops to halt the Prague Spring in the early morning of Aug. 21, 1968.The manifesto, which was published on June 27, 1968, in several leading newspapers, helped fan a robust backlash in the Kremlin against the liberalization of Czechoslovakia, resulting in an invasion by Warsaw Pact troops to halt the Prague Spring in the early morning of Aug. 21, 1968.
In the aftermath, a period of repression known as “normalization,” Mr. Vaculik’s writings were censored. But he remained defiant and continued to use his pen as his most potent weapon.In the aftermath, a period of repression known as “normalization,” Mr. Vaculik’s writings were censored. But he remained defiant and continued to use his pen as his most potent weapon.
In 1977, he, along with fellow dissidents including Vaclav Havel, who would later become president of the Czech Republic, helped organize Charter 77, which became one of the most influential human rights movements in the former Soviet bloc. In 1977, he and fellow dissidents including Vaclav Havel, who would later become president of the Czech Republic, helped organize Charter 77, which became one of the most influential human rights movements in the former Soviet bloc.
“He was one of a small group of literary figures who not only wrote great books but also influenced events and spearheaded political changes in Czechoslovakia,” said Jiri Pehe, the director of New York University in Prague, who knew Mr. Vaculik over the past 20 years. “He played an important role in the reform process, and his writings were often quoted by the Kremlin as evidence that liberals needed to be silenced.”“He was one of a small group of literary figures who not only wrote great books but also influenced events and spearheaded political changes in Czechoslovakia,” said Jiri Pehe, the director of New York University in Prague, who knew Mr. Vaculik over the past 20 years. “He played an important role in the reform process, and his writings were often quoted by the Kremlin as evidence that liberals needed to be silenced.”
The son of a carpenter, Mr. Vaculik was born on July 23, 1926, in Brumov, a village in Moravia in the east of the country. He worked in a shoe factory before moving to Prague after World War II. The son of a carpenter, Mr. Vaculik was born on July 23, 1926, in Brumov, a village in the Moravia region. He worked in a shoe factory before moving to Prague after World War II.
He is survived by his wife, Madla, and five children.He is survived by his wife, Madla, and five children.
Mr. Vaculik remained a wry critic to the end with a natural inclination to rail against injustice.Mr. Vaculik remained a wry critic to the end with a natural inclination to rail against injustice.
In “A Cup of Coffee With My Interrogator,” his personal chronicle of life under Communism, Mr. Vaculik recounts an episode when a Lieutenant Colonel Noga asks his views of how critics in the Western media are using the Czechoslovak government’s treatment of writers as a pretext for a “slanderous campaign against Czechoslovakia.”In “A Cup of Coffee With My Interrogator,” his personal chronicle of life under Communism, Mr. Vaculik recounts an episode when a Lieutenant Colonel Noga asks his views of how critics in the Western media are using the Czechoslovak government’s treatment of writers as a pretext for a “slanderous campaign against Czechoslovakia.”
Mr. Vaculik replies, “I will answer this question as soon as I have had an opportunity to read what the Western press has to say on the subject.”Mr. Vaculik replies, “I will answer this question as soon as I have had an opportunity to read what the Western press has to say on the subject.”