This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/09/world/europe/in-turkish-election-a-foe-recep-erdogan-could-not-beat-voter-fatigue.html

The article has changed 6 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
In Turkish Election, a Foe Recep Erdogan Could Not Beat: Voter Fatigue In Turkish Election, a Foe Recep Erdogan Could Not Beat: Voter Fatigue
(about 7 hours later)
ISTANBUL — For many Turkish voters, including some longstanding supporters of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, enough was enough. ISTANBUL — In choosing a Parliament without a majority party, Turkish voters have curtailed the ambitions of President Recep Tayyip Erdogan to claim new powers in an election hailed as a triumph of Turkish democracy.
Mr. Erdogan followed a familiar script throughout the election campaign, using the language of Islam to whip up support among his religious base and denouncing critical voices as enemies of the state. His most ardent supporters lauded him as a figure almost as consequential as the Prophet Muhammad himself, deepening many Turks’ sense that a personality cult had enveloped their president. Yet even as Mr. Erdogan’s opponents celebrated their gains Monday, the result raised the prospect of instability in Turkey, as its political parties jockey to form coalitions. At stake, analysts said, is the stalled peace process with Turkey’s Kurdish minority, which is opposed by the far-right party that could play a crucial role in forming a new government, and the country’s already shaky economy.
Underscoring the fears of political turmoil ahead, the Turkish lira tumbled in value Monday, at one point reaching a record low of 2.81 to the dollar, and the country’s stock market tumbled.
Mr. Erdogan remains powerful, with a loyal bureaucracy built up over a decade and a term that stretches to 2019. But he now may face the prospect of a prime minister from a party other than his own, perhaps the most troublesome possibility and one that could lead to political gridlock and a power struggle between Mr. Erdogan and the Parliament.
Together, the three main opposition parties have enough seats in Parliament to form a governing coalition, and the leaders of all three have said they would balk at joining any government led by Mr. Erdogan’s Islamist Justice and Development Party, or A.K.P.
Even so, many analysts discounted this, saying that some sort of coalition is likely to emerge, one that would include a weakened A.K.P. and that would no longer be able to rule single-handedly.
The most likely coalition, analysts said, is one between the A.K.P. and the far-right Nationalist Movement Party, or M.H.P., which did well in the elections. Such a coalition could imperil the progress Turkey has made in recent years in advancing the rights of minorities, especially among Kurds.
Mr. Erdogan ended decades of guerrilla warfare by pushing a peace process with Kurdish insurgents, even though it has stalled in recent months. A deal with the nationalists, given their opposition to any concessions to the Kurds, would likely halt that process and raise the possibility of renewed violence.
There is always the chance that the parties will fail to form a government over the next 45 days, which would give Mr. Erdogan the option of calling for new elections. But the opposition parties’ expressed reluctance to join a coalition with the A.K.P. may just be posturing, some experts say, and that they are currently maneuvering to extract the best possible deal.
“There will be some political instability, but that is part of the rules of the game,” said Sinan Ulgen, the chairman of the Center for Economic and Foreign Policy Studies, a research institution in Istanbul. “But fundamentally I don’t think this will be a protracted period of instability, essentially because the opposition parties are hungry for power.”
As Turks faced an uncertain political future, many on Monday also celebrated what amounted to a stunning outcome to the elections: the first major electoral setback for their powerful president.
Many Turkish voters, including some longstanding supporters of Mr. Erdogan, seemed finally to have had enough of their president’s abrasive style. Mr. Erdogan followed a familiar script throughout the election campaign, using the language of Islam to whip up support among his religious base and denouncing critical voices as enemies of the state. His most ardent supporters lauded him as a figure almost as consequential as the Prophet Muhammad himself, deepening many Turks’ sense that a personality cult had enveloped their president.
“He thought previous formulas he had used — painting the opposition as terrorists, traitors and infidels, and throwing in Israel and the interest lobby and the big bad West — would work,” said Asli Aydintasbas, a Turkish columnist and analyst for CNN Turk. “But people had heard of this for a long time, and they were tired.”“He thought previous formulas he had used — painting the opposition as terrorists, traitors and infidels, and throwing in Israel and the interest lobby and the big bad West — would work,” said Asli Aydintasbas, a Turkish columnist and analyst for CNN Turk. “But people had heard of this for a long time, and they were tired.”
Now Turkish voters have spoken. Mr. Erdogan’s Islamist Justice and Development Party (known by its Turkish initials, A.K.P.) has lost its majority in Parliament, and his iron grip on Turkish politics has loosened, even though he himself was not on the ballot. The defeat almost certainly stymied his ambition to push forward with a new constitution and consolidate power in an executive presidency. As president, Mr. Erdogan himself was not on the ballot. But the defeat almost certainly stymied his ambition to push forward with a new constitution and to consolidate power in an executive presidency.
“Pax Erdogan is over,” said Ozgur Unluhisarcikli, the director of the Ankara office of the German Marshall Fund of the United States, a research organization.“Pax Erdogan is over,” said Ozgur Unluhisarcikli, the director of the Ankara office of the German Marshall Fund of the United States, a research organization.
Mr. Erdogan’s opponents celebrated their gains on Monday, but the result raised the prospect of instability in Turkey, as its political parties jockey to form coalitions. Mr. Erdogan remains very powerful — he has a loyal bureaucracy built up over a decade, and his term runs until 2019 – but he may now face the prospect of a prime minister from a party other than his own. Together, the three main opposition parties have enough seats in Parliament to form a governing coalition, and the leaders of all three have said they would balk at joining any A.K.P.-led government.
Underscoring fears of political turmoil ahead, the Turkish lira tumbled in value on Monday, at one point reaching a record low of 2.81 to the dollar, and the country’s stock market slid.
Mr. Erdogan did not appear in public on Monday, allowing the country to divert its eyes from its president for a day, even as it was left to wonder whether his dominance of Turkish public life was coming to an end.Mr. Erdogan did not appear in public on Monday, allowing the country to divert its eyes from its president for a day, even as it was left to wonder whether his dominance of Turkish public life was coming to an end.
In the month of May, there was only one day when Mr. Erdogan was not featured prominently on the front pages of all five mainstream pro-government newspapers in the country, but on Monday, only two of the papers had him on the cover, and in each case it was a small photo of him casting his ballot. Television talk shows on Monday focused not on him but on the intricacies of possible governing coalitions to come. In a short statement issued by his office, Mr. Erdogan struck a conciliatory tone that, notably, expressed respect for the democratic process.
In a short statement published by his office, Mr. Erdogan struck a conciliatory tone that, notably, expressed respect for the democratic process. “Our nation’s opinion is above everything else,” he said. “I believe the results, which do not give the opportunity to any party to form a single-party government, will be assessed healthily and realistically by every party.”
“Our nation’s opinion is above everything else,” he said in the statement. “I believe the results, which do not give the opportunity to any party to form a single-party government, will be assessed healthily and realistically by every party.”
Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu, the nominal head of the A.K.P., met with his cabinet and party officials in Ankara on Monday to weigh their next steps, and was scheduled to meet with Mr. Erdogan as well.
In the earlier years of Mr. Erdogan’s leadership, Turkey’s economy boomed, its religious masses were empowered, minority rights improved and the country took important steps toward joining the European Union. Turkey was held up by Western leaders, including President Obama, as a model of democracy in the Islamic world that Arab countries in the grip of turmoil could look to for guidance.In the earlier years of Mr. Erdogan’s leadership, Turkey’s economy boomed, its religious masses were empowered, minority rights improved and the country took important steps toward joining the European Union. Turkey was held up by Western leaders, including President Obama, as a model of democracy in the Islamic world that Arab countries in the grip of turmoil could look to for guidance.
But the Arab Spring revolutions in several countries where Turkey tried to shape events, like Syria and Libya, collapsed into civil war, and the Islamist president it supported in Egypt was overthrown by the military, dimming Turkey’s star. But the Arab Spring revolutions dimmed Turkey’s star. Several countries where Turkey tried to shape events, like Syria and Libya, collapsed into civil war, and the Islamist president it supported in Egypt, Mohammed Morsi, was overthrown by the military.
Meanwhile, the country’s domestic politics turned increasingly unstable, with mass protests and a corruption scandal touching high-level officials, while Mr. Erdogan’s power grew and grew. Turkey came to be seen not as an example to emulate but as a cautionary tale.Meanwhile, the country’s domestic politics turned increasingly unstable, with mass protests and a corruption scandal touching high-level officials, while Mr. Erdogan’s power grew and grew. Turkey came to be seen not as an example to emulate but as a cautionary tale.
For some, then, the election on Sunday was an affirmation that Turkey still had a flourishing democratic culture despite the troubles of recent years.For some, then, the election on Sunday was an affirmation that Turkey still had a flourishing democratic culture despite the troubles of recent years.
“This is a triumph for democracy,” said Kerem Oktem, a professor of Southern European Studies and Modern Turkey at the University of Graz in Austria, and the author of “Angry Nation: Turkey Since 1989.” “This is a triumph for democracy,” said Kerem Oktem, a professor of southern European studies and modern Turkey at the University of Graz in Austria, and the author of “Angry Nation: Turkey Since 1989.”
“Turks don’t do revolutions,” Mr. Oktem observed. “Turks don’t do revolutions,” Mr. Oktem said.
And Mr. Unluhisarcikli of the German Marshall Fund said, “Turkey has proved to be a self-correcting democracy.”
Mr. Oktem saw parallels between Sunday’s election and two pivotal votes in Turkey’s past. In 1950, voters pushed aside the party of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the founder of modern Turkey. And in 1983, three years after a military coup, voters rejected the party backed by the generals, a stunning result at the time.Mr. Oktem saw parallels between Sunday’s election and two pivotal votes in Turkey’s past. In 1950, voters pushed aside the party of Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, the founder of modern Turkey. And in 1983, three years after a military coup, voters rejected the party backed by the generals, a stunning result at the time.
“Whenever the electorate of Turkey has had a choice between certain dictatorship and the democratic process, they went for the democratic alternative,” Mr. Oktem said.“Whenever the electorate of Turkey has had a choice between certain dictatorship and the democratic process, they went for the democratic alternative,” Mr. Oktem said.
Mr. Erdogan’s party was defeated largely because secular Turks, environmentalists, women and urban intellectuals — the crowd that dominated the antigovernment protests in 2013 — rallied to the side of the Peoples’ Democratic Party, or H.D.P., a largely Kurdish bloc. Mr. Erdogan’s party was defeated largely because secular Turks, environmentalists, women and urban intellectuals — the crowd that dominated the antigovernment protests in 2013 — rallied to the side of the People’s Democratic Party, or H.D.P., a largely Kurdish bloc.
The party was once defined solely by its push for Kurdish rights, but in this election it was able to expand its constituency enough to clear the legal threshold, 10 percent of the vote, to qualify for representation in Parliament. By winning nearly 13 percent on Sunday, the party exceeded expectations, and was the main reason the A.K.P. lost its legislative majority.The party was once defined solely by its push for Kurdish rights, but in this election it was able to expand its constituency enough to clear the legal threshold, 10 percent of the vote, to qualify for representation in Parliament. By winning nearly 13 percent on Sunday, the party exceeded expectations, and was the main reason the A.K.P. lost its legislative majority.
While the H.D.P. gave voice to disaffected liberals, its performance also marked a watershed in Turkish political history by putting the Kurds, an ethnic minority that has faced oppression and waged a bloody insurgency against the Turkish state for nearly 30 years, in the position of political power brokers. For all of that, Mr. Erdogan remains president and will still be able to wield considerable power because of the network of relationships he has built up after a decade as prime minister and then president.
Ms. Aydintasbas, the columnist and commentator, described the Kurdish party and its liberal allies as, “a rainbow coalition of the far left,” and likened H.D.P. to the Syriza party in Greece, the leftist party that defeated that country’s political establishment.
“People voted for the H.D.P. “ she said, “because somehow they liked the message: of living together. Reform. Change.”
During the campaign Mr. Erdogan sought to tarnish the H.D.P. several ways. He said it was a party of terrorists because of its past links to the Kurdistan Workers’ Party, the armed insurgent group. And he called the party of homosexuals because it fielded an openly gay candidate, the first in modern Turkish history.
Many analysts said it was a good thing for Turkish democracy that the H.D.P. cleared the 10 percent threshold and won seats in Parliament. If they were shut out, the Kurds would probably have alleged voter fraud and flooded the streets in protest, and political frustration may have led to a renewal of the insurgency.
The presidency of Turkey is supposed to be largely ceremonial, and above partisan politics. But Mr. Erdogan flouted the law by openly campaigning for the A.K.P. His party seems to have suffered at the polls because his aggressive and divisive style wore thin, even among voters who were once his staunch supporters.
“I think the biggest mistake for Erdogan in this election was the way he haphazardly waved the Quran in the air while campaigning, and used our religious book for political gain,” said Semih Yilmaz, 37, a taxi driver in Istanbul, who said many of his friends voted against the A.K.P. for that reason alone. “It was an insult that cannot be easily forgiven,” he said.
Erol Saydam, another former A.K.P. supporter who works as an electrician in the city of Bursa, said: “I respect Erdogan for what he has done for this country over the years. He is a hard worker, and Turkey has developed because of him. But he has made the election environment very unpleasant by turning people against each other.”
For all of that, Mr. Erdogan remains president, and though it was denied a majority, the A.K.P. is still the country’s most powerful party by a wide margin. Some analysts predicted an early election, which Mr. Erdogan can call if no governing majority is formed within 45 days.
Meanwhile, Mr. Erdogan will still be able to wield considerable power because of the network of relationships he has built up after a decade as prime minister and then president.
“He will be dominant,” said Soli Ozel, a columnist and academic in Istanbul. But he overplayed his hand in the election, Mr. Ozel said, and now, “whether he will be able to determine events, I doubt it.”“He will be dominant,” said Soli Ozel, a columnist and academic in Istanbul. But he overplayed his hand in the election, Mr. Ozel said, and now, “whether he will be able to determine events, I doubt it.”