This article is from the source 'theintercept' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at https://firstlook.org/theintercept/2015/06/03/republican-jeb-hensarling-attacks-democrats-throwing-wall-street-big-wet-kiss%e2%80%a8/

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Republican Jeb Hensarling Attacks Democrats For "Throwing Wall Street a Big, Wet Kiss” Republican Jeb Hensarling Attacks Democrats for "Throwing Wall Street a Big, Wet Kiss”
(about 7 hours later)
House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling called out Democrats on Wednesday for their support of the Export-Import bank, which mostly subsidizes big business.House Financial Services Committee Chairman Jeb Hensarling called out Democrats on Wednesday for their support of the Export-Import bank, which mostly subsidizes big business.
“Now, how many times have we heard Democrats vilify Wall Street banks?” the Texas Republican asked. “By reauthorizing Ex-Im, my Democratic colleagues are simply throwing Wall Street a big, wet kiss.”“Now, how many times have we heard Democrats vilify Wall Street banks?” the Texas Republican asked. “By reauthorizing Ex-Im, my Democratic colleagues are simply throwing Wall Street a big, wet kiss.”
Hensarling spoke at the opening of a hearing he was chairing on the future of the bank, which provides loan guarantees to support the international sales of American products such as jetliners. The bank’s charter expires June 30 unless Congress renews it, which Hensarling – a Tea Party favorite — opposes. Hensarling spoke at the opening of a hearing he was chairing on the future of the bank, which provides loan guarantees to support the international sales of American products such as jetliners. The bank’s charter expires June 30 unless Congress renews it, which Hensarling — a Tea Party favorite — opposes.
Citing figures from a Mercatus Center report, he said “the big banks profit off Ex-Im like few others. The latest data I’ve seen shows JP Morgan Chase received $5.1 billion in assistance, Citigroup $1½ billion, Wells Fargo half a billion dollars, and HSBC almost $1 billion.” Citing figures from a Mercatus Center report, he said, “the big banks profit off Ex-Im like few others. The latest data I’ve seen shows JP Morgan Chase received $5.1 billion in assistance, Citigroup $1.5 billion, Wells Fargo half a billion dollars, and HSBC almost $1 billion.”
Both political parties are fractured in this debate, with Tea-Party Republicans and progressive Democrats mostly opposed. Hensarling began his remarks “by admitting that Republicans on my side of the aisle are split on the issue.” But he was charitable about the schism in his own party. “I do understand one person’s corporate welfare and politically-driven capital allocation is another person’s vital export support program and level playing field,” he said — as if the two could somehow be reconciled. Both political parties are fractured in this debate, with Tea-Party Republicans and progressive Democrats mostly opposed. Hensarling began his remarks “by admitting that Republicans on my side of the aisle are split on the issue.” But he was charitable about the schism in his own party. “I do understand one person’s corporate welfare and politically driven capital allocation is another person’s vital export support program and level playing field,” he said — as if the two could somehow be reconciled.
By contrast, he was merciless about Democrats who support the bank, and their coziness with Wall Street. By contrast, he was merciless about Democrats who support the bank and their coziness with Wall Street.
It makes sense for the big banks to support Ex-Im, he said. “After all, they have hardworking taxpayers to bail out any Wall Street losses.”It makes sense for the big banks to support Ex-Im, he said. “After all, they have hardworking taxpayers to bail out any Wall Street losses.”
Hensarling pointed out the hypocrisy on the other side of the aisle: “Just six weeks ago the Ranking Member asked the question, ‘Why is it that the richest of the folks in the businesses in this country, who have so many paid lobbyists … [are] able to direct the public policy in ways the average citizen cannot do?’ Boeing, which receives fully one-third of Ex-Im’s support, spent $35 million in lobbying expenses in the last Congress to help keep Ex-Im afloat. Their top 5 executives made $48.6 million in 2013 alone. The public reports from the other top beneficiaries of Ex-Im like GE, Caterpillar, Exxon Mobil look pretty similar. So I would say to my friend the Ranking Member, perhaps their paid lobbying is so successful and their executives are getting so rich because you’re doing everything you can to help them.” Hensarling pointed out the hypocrisy on the other side of the aisle: “Just six weeks ago the ranking member asked the question, ‘Why is it that the richest of the folks in the businesses in this country, who have so many paid lobbyists … [are] able to direct the public policy in ways the average citizen cannot do?’ Boeing, which receives fully one-third of Ex-Im’s support, spent $35 million in lobbying expenses in the last Congress to help keep Ex-Im afloat. Their top five executives made $48.6 million in 2013 alone. The public reports from the other top beneficiaries of Ex-Im like GE, Caterpillar, Exxon Mobil look pretty similar. So I would say to my friend the ranking member, perhaps their paid lobbying is so successful and their executives are getting so rich because you’re doing everything you can to help them.”
Watch the video:Watch the video:
Photo: Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call/GettyPhoto: Bill Clark/CQ Roll Call/Getty
(This post is from our blog: Unofficial Sources.)(This post is from our blog: Unofficial Sources.)