This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jun/03/andy-coulson-cleared-of-perjury-in-scottish-court

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Andy Coulson cleared of perjury as Scottish court case collapses Andy Coulson cleared of perjury as Scottish court case collapses
(35 minutes later)
David Cameron’s former director of communications, Andy Coulson, has been cleared of lying in court after a Scottish judge threw out charges of alleged perjury.David Cameron’s former director of communications, Andy Coulson, has been cleared of lying in court after a Scottish judge threw out charges of alleged perjury.
Lord Burns told Coulson at the high court in Edinburgh he had been formally acquitted of lying under oath about his knowledge of phone hacking at the News of the World while he was the paper’s editor.Lord Burns told Coulson at the high court in Edinburgh he had been formally acquitted of lying under oath about his knowledge of phone hacking at the News of the World while he was the paper’s editor.
The judge’s dramatic decision came following five days of legal consideration and deliberations after Coulson’s defence advocate, Murdo MacLeod QC, successfully argued that Scottish prosecutors had misunderstood the Scottish law on perjury.The judge’s dramatic decision came following five days of legal consideration and deliberations after Coulson’s defence advocate, Murdo MacLeod QC, successfully argued that Scottish prosecutors had misunderstood the Scottish law on perjury.
Burns had delivered his ruling on Monday morning with the jury absent from court but then agreed to a Crown request for time to consider an appeal. He told Coulson, 47, from Preston in Kent, on Monday that, pending the appeal: “I must suspend the acquittal that I have just given.” Burns had delivered his ruling on Monday morning with the jury absent from court but then agreed to a crown request for time to consider an appeal. He told Coulson, 47, from Preston in Kent, on Monday that, pending the appeal: “I must suspend the acquittal that I have just given.”
Despite earlier suggestions the prosecution was planning to lodge an urgent appeal on Wednesday, the Crown Office decided late on Tuesday not to contest Burns’s decision.Despite earlier suggestions the prosecution was planning to lodge an urgent appeal on Wednesday, the Crown Office decided late on Tuesday not to contest Burns’s decision.
Burns told jurors that he was throwing out the case because “the crown had not led sufficient evidence” to satisfy him that the evidence he gave about hacking in the Tommy Sheridan trial in 2010 was relevant.Burns told jurors that he was throwing out the case because “the crown had not led sufficient evidence” to satisfy him that the evidence he gave about hacking in the Tommy Sheridan trial in 2010 was relevant.
In Scottish law perjury can only be committed if the alleged lie has a material effect on the outcome of the previous trial.In Scottish law perjury can only be committed if the alleged lie has a material effect on the outcome of the previous trial.
“Not every lie amounts to perjury,” Burns told jurors, in a hearing that lasted less than 20 minutes.“Not every lie amounts to perjury,” Burns told jurors, in a hearing that lasted less than 20 minutes.
Delivering his ruling, he said he had “sustained the arguments in favour of the accused” and told Coulson: “I acquit you of the charge.”Delivering his ruling, he said he had “sustained the arguments in favour of the accused” and told Coulson: “I acquit you of the charge.”
“Thank you” said Coulson calmly before walking out of court three. “Thank you,” said Coulson calmly before walking out of court three.
Speaking outside the court, Coulson branded the trial a “gross waste of public money”. He insisted that he had never lied and the prosecution had been unwarranted. “This prosecution was always wrong,” he added.
“I didn’t lie and the prosecution, in my view, was a gross waste of public money. I’m just delighted after four pretty testing years ... my family have had a good day,” he said.
Burns took his decision to acquit Coulson on Monday after two days of legal submissions but it could not be reported until Wednesday as the crown was given time to decide whether to appeal against the ruling.Burns took his decision to acquit Coulson on Monday after two days of legal submissions but it could not be reported until Wednesday as the crown was given time to decide whether to appeal against the ruling.
Burns agreed with MacLeod’s case that Coulson’s alleged lies under oath, when he appeared as a witness during the trial for perjury of former Scottish Socialist party leader Tommy Sheridan in 2010, were not material to the main case against Sheridan at that trial. Therefore it failed to meet the required definition of perjury.Burns agreed with MacLeod’s case that Coulson’s alleged lies under oath, when he appeared as a witness during the trial for perjury of former Scottish Socialist party leader Tommy Sheridan in 2010, were not material to the main case against Sheridan at that trial. Therefore it failed to meet the required definition of perjury.
In his judgment, Burns said: “I consider that the false evidence alleged in this indictment was not relevant evidence at the original trial and the charge of perjury in the indictment is irrelevant.”In his judgment, Burns said: “I consider that the false evidence alleged in this indictment was not relevant evidence at the original trial and the charge of perjury in the indictment is irrelevant.”
The jury, which was sent home a week ago, heard three senior NoW executives accuse Coulson of knowing about hacking and having direct knowledge of the £104,000-a-year contract awarded to Glenn Mulcaire, the private investigator convicted in 2007 of helping hack royal family mobile phones for the then NoW royal editor, Clive Goodman.The jury, which was sent home a week ago, heard three senior NoW executives accuse Coulson of knowing about hacking and having direct knowledge of the £104,000-a-year contract awarded to Glenn Mulcaire, the private investigator convicted in 2007 of helping hack royal family mobile phones for the then NoW royal editor, Clive Goodman.
Coulson has always denied knowing phone hacking was rife at the NoW and said that he only knew of one specific incident of phone hacking, involving David Blunkett.Coulson has always denied knowing phone hacking was rife at the NoW and said that he only knew of one specific incident of phone hacking, involving David Blunkett.
Burns’s ruling, which came after only six days of evidence in a trial that was due to last for four weeks, ends a four-year ordeal for Coulson that began soon after he resigned as head of communications at No 10 in January 2011, less than a month after Sheridan’s conviction for perjury. Coulson will now be free to try to revive his career as there are no outstanding charges against him either in England or Scotland.Burns’s ruling, which came after only six days of evidence in a trial that was due to last for four weeks, ends a four-year ordeal for Coulson that began soon after he resigned as head of communications at No 10 in January 2011, less than a month after Sheridan’s conviction for perjury. Coulson will now be free to try to revive his career as there are no outstanding charges against him either in England or Scotland.
The jury in Edinburgh was not told that Coulson had already served seven months in jail, some of it in high-security prison Belmarsh, after being found guilty at the Old Bailey last year of being involved in a conspiracy to hack phones when he was editor of the News of the World.The jury in Edinburgh was not told that Coulson had already served seven months in jail, some of it in high-security prison Belmarsh, after being found guilty at the Old Bailey last year of being involved in a conspiracy to hack phones when he was editor of the News of the World.
Coulson’s acquittal, which comes three years after he was arrested by Scottish detectives at his London home, is a severe blow to Police Scotland and senior prosecutors in Edinburgh.Coulson’s acquittal, which comes three years after he was arrested by Scottish detectives at his London home, is a severe blow to Police Scotland and senior prosecutors in Edinburgh.
Police launched the Operation Rubicon investigation into alleged hacking, bugging and Data Protection Act breaches by journalists in July 2011 after the NoW was closed by Rupert Murdoch.Police launched the Operation Rubicon investigation into alleged hacking, bugging and Data Protection Act breaches by journalists in July 2011 after the NoW was closed by Rupert Murdoch.
In March, after spending nearly £1m on police salaries under Operation Rubicon, investigating the cases involving 23 hacking victims in Scotland, Police Scotland confirmed that four people had been charged and reported to prosecutors. All four have now been cleared, with Coulson the only suspect to stand trial.In March, after spending nearly £1m on police salaries under Operation Rubicon, investigating the cases involving 23 hacking victims in Scotland, Police Scotland confirmed that four people had been charged and reported to prosecutors. All four have now been cleared, with Coulson the only suspect to stand trial.
The Crown Office told the Guardian on Tuesday evening that prosecutors had dropped charges of perjury against Bob Bird, former editor of the News of the World’s Scotland edition, and charges of perverting the course of justice and other offences against Doug Wight, a news executive with the NoW in Glasgow. The Crown Office told the Guardian on Tuesday evening that prosecutors had dropped charges of perjury against Bob Bird, former editor of the News of the World’s Scottish edition, and charges of perverting the course of justice and other offences against Doug Wight, a news executive with the NoW in Glasgow.
On 1 May, the Crown Office disclosed it was no longer taking action against Gill Smith, a news editor at the Scottish Sun, who had been charged with offences in 2000 and 2001 under Operation Rubicon.On 1 May, the Crown Office disclosed it was no longer taking action against Gill Smith, a news editor at the Scottish Sun, who had been charged with offences in 2000 and 2001 under Operation Rubicon.
Sheridan was prosecuted in 2010 for lying in a defamation case he pursued against the News of the World after it reported he had visited a swingers’ club in Manchester.Sheridan was prosecuted in 2010 for lying in a defamation case he pursued against the News of the World after it reported he had visited a swingers’ club in Manchester.
He was found guilty of lying in that case and sent to jail. However, during the trial Sheridan, who conducted his own defence, called Coulson as a defence witness and quizzed him about his knowledge of hacking. Coulson had denied he was aware of a culture of hacking when he was at the helm and it was this that triggered this prosecution.He was found guilty of lying in that case and sent to jail. However, during the trial Sheridan, who conducted his own defence, called Coulson as a defence witness and quizzed him about his knowledge of hacking. Coulson had denied he was aware of a culture of hacking when he was at the helm and it was this that triggered this prosecution.
MacLeod successfully argued that the evidence given by Coulson could not have caused Sheridan to have been acquitted in 2010. “With the greatest respect to the advocate depute [the crown prosecutor] – and I mean no criticism of him – he is trying to make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear,” MacLeod told the court.MacLeod successfully argued that the evidence given by Coulson could not have caused Sheridan to have been acquitted in 2010. “With the greatest respect to the advocate depute [the crown prosecutor] – and I mean no criticism of him – he is trying to make a silk purse out of a sow’s ear,” MacLeod told the court.
Following Wednesday’s calling at the high court in Edinburgh, a Crown Office spokesperson said: “Andrew Coulson was a defence witness at the trial of Tommy Sheridan. He gave his evidence without objection as to relevancy. Following Wednesday’s calling at the high court in Edinburgh, a Crown Office spokesman said: “Andrew Coulson was a defence witness at the trial of Tommy Sheridan. He gave his evidence without objection as to relevancy.
“The crown indicted Coulson on the basis that he lied during parts of his evidence, in particular that he had no knowledge of phone hacking.“The crown indicted Coulson on the basis that he lied during parts of his evidence, in particular that he had no knowledge of phone hacking.
“The trial judge in the Coulson trial, at the conclusion of the prosecution evidence, ruled that this evidence was irrelevant and therefore could not found the basis for a prosecution for perjury.“The trial judge in the Coulson trial, at the conclusion of the prosecution evidence, ruled that this evidence was irrelevant and therefore could not found the basis for a prosecution for perjury.
“This brings proceedings to an end.”“This brings proceedings to an end.”