This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/may/31/nsa-reform-senate-deal-as-patriot-act

The article has changed 9 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Patriot Act powers to lapse at midnight as Senate fails to agree on NSA reform Bush-era surveillance powers to expire as US prepares to roll back NSA power
(about 3 hours later)
Republican senator Rand Paul forced at least a temporary shutdown of sweeping US surveillance powers on Sunday night after refusing to allow an accelerated vote on compromise legislation designed to more narrowly restrain the National Security Agency. Sweeping US surveillance powers, enjoyed by the National Security Agency since the aftermath of the 2001 terrorist attacks, shut down at midnight on Monday after a dramatic Senate showdown that saw even the NSA’s biggest supporters concede that substantial reforms were now inevitable.
Related: Patriot Act reform: Senate debates NSA surveillance – live updates Related: NSA reform advances as Senate moves to vote on USA Freedom Act – as it happened
In a double blow for Washington security hawks, represented by embattled Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell, it now looks likely that Congress will have to wait several days before passing that bill, the USA Freedom Act. Almost two years after the whistleblower Edward Snowden revealed to the Guardian that the Patriot Act was secretly being used to justify the collection of phone records from millions of Americans, critics of bulk surveillance went further than expected and forced the end of a range of other legal authorities covered by the Bush-era Patriot Act as well.
The reform legislation, which bans the NSA from collecting Americans’ telephone records in bulk, was initially opposed by McConnell. But with the clock ticking down toward the midnight expiration of broader powers initially granted after 9/11 under the Patriot Act, Republican leaders had few options but to get behind the bill as the best way of preserving other surveillance authority. The expired provisions, subject to a “sunset” clause from the beginning of June onwards, are likely to be replaced later this week with new legislation – the USA Freedom Act – that permanently bans the NSA from collecting telephone records in bulk and introduces new transparency rules for other surveillance activities. The USA Freedom Act, once passed, will be the first rollback of NSA surveillance since the seminal 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
“This is now the only realistic way forward,” said McConnell as he conceded there was no longer time to seek alternatives to a version of the USA Freedom Act that was previously passed by the House of Representatives. Instead, the Senate majority leader is reluctantly embracing the House-passed bill to which he previously objected, only with the addition of what he called “a few modest amendments”. But until then, in addition to the expiration of the NSA’s phone records collection, the FBI is prevented from using powers granted under the Patriot Act, including the pursuit of so-called “business records” relating to internet use, hotel and rental car records and credit card statements.
McConnell’s concession was a tacit acknowledgement that the bulk collection of US phone records exposed in June 2013 by the Guardian, thanks to leaks from whistleblower Edward Snowden, will end. Both developments represent a remarkable capitulation for the Republican Senate majority leader, Mitch McConnell, who had initially sought to simply extend the Patriot Act provisions, despite overwhelming support in the House of Representatives for the USA Freedom Act.
The Senate voted 77 to 17 to proceed to debate on the USA Freedom Act. Even Paul, after the procedural vote, conceded that the bill will ultimately pass. “Tonight begins the process of ending bulk collection,” he said. McConnell and his colleagues who opposed reform were thwarted in their efforts by a growing backlash by Senate Republicans and, in particular, his Kentucky colleague, Senator Rand Paul.
Paul, who is running for president on a libertarian-leaning agenda, added insult to injury for his party’s leaders by refusing to offer consent for a final vote on USA Freedom, which he believes does not go far enough in tackling the surveillance abuses revealed by Snowden. “This is the only realistic way forward,” acknowledged the Republican leader during a rare Sunday evening session just hours before the Patriot Act was set to expire. Shortly after, the Senate voted 77 to 17 to proceed to debate on the USA Freedom Act – a procedural hurdle that fell three votes short during another special session focused on surveillance reform nine days earlier.
“I am not going to take it any more and I believe the American people are not going to take it any more,” said Paul as the Senate convened for a rare Sunday evening session to deal with the crisis. The development was welcomed by the White House, which has also come to support the USA Freedom Act after Barack Obama proposed that the NSA could seek specific records directly from telephone companies instead.
“The Senate took an important – if late – step forward tonight,” White House press secretary, Josh Earnest, said. “We call on the Senate to ensure this irresponsible lapse in authorities is as short-lived as possible.”
Even Paul, after the procedural vote, conceded that the bill will now ultimately pass, although appeared determined to drag it out as a long as possible. “Tonight begins the process of ending bulk collection,” he said.
Paul, who is running for president on a libertarian-leaning agenda, believes the USA Freedom Act does not go far enough in tackling the surveillance abuses revealed by Snowden.
“I am not going to take it any more and I believe the American people are not going to take it any more,” Paul said as he took the Senate floor for another of the extended speeches that have helped propel him into the public spotlight at a key moment in the Republican race for the presidency.
McConnell attempted to seek a temporary extension for additional Patriot Act powers to be affected by the expiration of powers unrelated to the NSA’s bulk domestic phone metadata program – including so-called “lone-wolf” and “roving wiretap” capabilities.McConnell attempted to seek a temporary extension for additional Patriot Act powers to be affected by the expiration of powers unrelated to the NSA’s bulk domestic phone metadata program – including so-called “lone-wolf” and “roving wiretap” capabilities.
But even a temporary continuation of those surveillance authorities were opposed by Paul, who has the power to block such attempts to speed up Senate business by seeking unanimous consent.But even a temporary continuation of those surveillance authorities were opposed by Paul, who has the power to block such attempts to speed up Senate business by seeking unanimous consent.
Now, not only will the NSA domestic surveillance program shut down, so will three provisions of the Patriot Act that have long been the bane of privacy advocates – particularly the “business records” provision that the FBI has used to amass what a recent Justice Department report described as “large collections” of Americans’ internet data. Paul’s tactics provoked angry reactions from establishment Republicans, including a heated exchange with John McCain, who accused him of endangering national security to boost his presidential campaign. McCain said on Sunday that Paul “obviously has a higher priority on his fundraising and political ambitions than securing the nation”.
Paul’s tactics provoked angry seasons from establishment Republicans, including an angry exchange with John McCain, who accused him of jeopardizing national security to boost his presidential campaign. McCain said on Sunday that Paul “obviously has a higher priority on his fundraising and political ambitions than securing the nation”. Paul, gesturing toward the acrimony that persists in the Senate even after the vote made passage of the USA Freedom Act a foregone conclusion, said his Republican opponents were rooting for a terrorist attack to embarrass him.
Paul, gesturing toward the acrimony that persists in the Senate even after the vote made passage of the USA Freedom Act a forgone conclusion, said that his Republican opponents were rooting for a terrorist attack to embarrass him.
“Some of them I think secretly want an attack on the United States so they can blame it on me,” Paul said.“Some of them I think secretly want an attack on the United States so they can blame it on me,” Paul said.
Obama and his intelligence chief, James Clapper, also made a final push on Friday for the Senate to pass the USA Freedom Act, alleging that the expiration of the Patriot Act provisions would expose the US to terrorism. Obama and his intelligence chief, James Clapper, also made a final push on Friday for the Senate to pass the USA Freedom Act, alleging the expiration of the Patriot Act provisions would expose the US to terrorism.
But a Justice Department inspector general report found that the FBI had come to use the business-records provision to amass “large collections” of Americans’ communications data. It noted that the spread of internet access had lead to an explosion in information accessible to the FBI, and cast doubt on Justice Department and congressional assurances that the authority, known as Section 215, is critical for counter-terrorism. But a Justice Department inspector general report found the FBI had come to use the business-records provision to amass “large collections” of Americans’ communications data. It noted that the spread of internet access had lead to an explosion in information accessible to the FBI, and cast doubt on Justice Department and congressional assurances that the authority, known as Section 215, is critical for counterterrorism.
“[T]he agents we interviewed did not identify any major case developments that resulted from use of the records obtained in response to Section 215 orders, but told us that the material produced pursuant to Section 215 orders was valuable in that it was used to support other investigative requests, develop investigative leads, and corroborate other information,” the DoJ report found.“[T]he agents we interviewed did not identify any major case developments that resulted from use of the records obtained in response to Section 215 orders, but told us that the material produced pursuant to Section 215 orders was valuable in that it was used to support other investigative requests, develop investigative leads, and corroborate other information,” the DoJ report found.
Originally mindful of the privacy implications of Section 215, Congress permitted it to “sunset” after five years. Yet with nearly all aspects of its practical applications hidden under extensive secrecy – especially the post-2006 addition of NSA bulk surveillance – reauthorization of the Patriot Act provisions had become routine.Originally mindful of the privacy implications of Section 215, Congress permitted it to “sunset” after five years. Yet with nearly all aspects of its practical applications hidden under extensive secrecy – especially the post-2006 addition of NSA bulk surveillance – reauthorization of the Patriot Act provisions had become routine.
The last reapproval, in 2011, passed 72-23 in the Senate and 250-153 in the House. The last time the legislation was considered, in 2011, it passed 72-23 in the Senate and 250-153 in the House.
But this time, Snowden’s revelations pierced the veneer of government secrecy and ushered in perhaps the most open debate about surveillance powers in the NSA’s 63-year history.But this time, Snowden’s revelations pierced the veneer of government secrecy and ushered in perhaps the most open debate about surveillance powers in the NSA’s 63-year history.
“No doubt it played a role,” Republican senator Dean Heller told the Guardian. “I think it played the same role for me as it did for most of the American people, who were surprised and stunned that the government had this sort of access to this kind of data.”“No doubt it played a role,” Republican senator Dean Heller told the Guardian. “I think it played the same role for me as it did for most of the American people, who were surprised and stunned that the government had this sort of access to this kind of data.”