This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/unions-outraged-at-camerons-partisan-attack-on-how-labour-is-funded-10279135.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Unions outraged at Cameron’s ‘partisan attack’ on how Labour is funded Queen's Speech 2015: Unions outraged at Cameron’s ‘partisan attack’ on how Labour is funded
(about 5 hours later)
The Government has been accused of a "shamelessly partisan attack" on Labour funding after changes to union subscriptions were included in the Queen's Speech. David Cameron as been accused of using the Tories’ first majority in 18 years to launch a “shamelessly partisan” attack on Labour funding that could deprive the party of millions of pounds in donations.
The Conservative election manifesto pledged legislation to ensure trade unions use a "transparent opt-in process for union subscriptions". Under plans unveiled in the Queen Speech, the Government said it would legislate to force all trade union members to actively consent to their subscriptions being used for political purposes.
But when the Trade Unions Bill was published, the words "for the political fund element" were added. The move, if passed, is widely expected to result in a sharp fall in union donations to Labour which, over the past five years, have contributed more than £50m to the party. This represents around half of Labour’s income.
With little explanation of what is being proposed, unions now assume that members will have to opt-in to paying an annual amount to Labour, rather than opting out as at present. The plans could also affect the ability of unions to campaign more broadly on political issues and is certain to become one of the most contentious aspects of the Conservatives’ new legislative agenda. However, Mr Cameron will also face strong opposition to his plans to bring back the “snooper’s charter”, giving police and security services greater powers to intercept communications data. The Investigatory Powers Bill will grant police and the security services access to email and text message activity, as well as internet browsing habits.
There is speculation that the measure is bound to hit union funds to Labour. Ministers, who are braced for a civil liberties row about the move, decided to press ahead with the measure shortly before they finalised the list of Bills in the Queen’s Speech. They rejected delaying the move or a phased introduction of the scheme, arguing that technology was moving so rapidly that delay could be counter-productive.
A Unite spokesman said: "The Tories are taking Britain back to the 1920s with this shamelessly partisan attack on the funding of the opposition party. Other Bills likely to face a difficult passage through the new Parliament include plans to confiscate the pay of illegal immigrants, a crackdown on so-called non-violent extremists and restricting welfare payments still further.
"Political funds are already subject to approval being given in regular ballots by unions. Tory hedge fund and multimillionaire donors will face no similar restrictions, leaving boards free to write hefty cheques backing the Tory Party. There will also be Bills extending the right to buy to housing association tenants; an increase in free childcare for three and four-year-olds, and further Scottish devolution.
"Absent from the Tory manifesto, there is zero popular mandate for this move which is just one more attack on working people. It is clear there is no place for trade unions in Cameron's 'one nation'." However, the Government confirmed yesterday that its most controversial legislation, which would scrap the Human Rights Act and replace it with a British Bill of Rights, would be put on ice for at least another year while the proposals are put out to public consultation.
Paul Kenny, GMB general-secretary, told the Press Association: "This is just the same old Tories who are anti-trade union and anti-working people having a voice. The Labour Party reacted with fury to the plans to restrict political donations which senior party figures fear could severely hamper their efforts to rebuild following a disastrous election defeat.A spokesman pointed out that the Government was doing nothing to tackle large political donations from business or millionaires, and went on to accuse Mr Cameron of trying to “rig” the system to favour the Tories.
"It's one rule for the Tory slush fund, hedge funds and another for trade union members. “It’s one rule for the Tory slush fund, hedge funds and another for trade union members,” said Paul Kenny, the general-secretary of the GMB union.
"This will not deter or silence the voices of millions of working people who have already given their approval for political funds through democratic ballots governed by statute. “It is not sustainable to allow the elite and companies unfettered and unlimited rights to fund the Tory party, while shackling the bodies that have funded the political opposition to them for more than a century.”
"It will bring state funding for political parties a step nearer. It is not sustainable to allow the elite and companies unfettered and unlimited rights to fund the Tory Party while shackling the bodies that have funded the political opposition to them for more than a century." The Bill will also introduce a 50 per cent voting threshold for union ballot turnouts. In addition, there will be a requirement that 40 per cent of those entitled to vote must be in favour of industrial action in essential public services, such as health, education, fire and transport.
A Labour Party spokesperson said: "On the union opt-in, we support measures to ensure increased transparency and have already introduced reforms to Labour Party processes to reflect this. A spokesman for the Unite  union claimed that the Tories were “taking Britain back to the 1920s” with a “shamelessly partisan” agenda, but a spokesman for No 10 insisted the proposals were reasonable. “No one is suggesting that you should be able to opt in or opt out of paying your union subscription,” he said.
"Any proposals from the Government must be done in a fair non-partisan way and which doesn't rig things in favour of the Tory Party." “If you are members of the union you pay your subscription. “The only debate is about the political levy. At the moment you are supposed to be able to opt out but there is concern that at the moment that isn’t being spelled out very clearly to new members.”
PA Full employment and welfare benefits Bill
Working-age benefits, tax credits and child benefit are frozen for two years. The cap on the total amount of benefits that a household can receive is cut from £26,000 to £23,000. Trouble rating: 2/5
Extremism Bill
The Home Secretary will get powers to ban extremist (but non-violent) groups and premises used by radical preachers will be shut. Ofcom will get extra powers to act against channels that broadcast “extremist content”. Trouble rating: 3/5
Investigatory powers Bill
A new name for the “snooper’s charter”. The Government is braced for a civil liberties storm. Trouble rating: 4/5
Enterprise Bill
This caps “golden goodbyes” paid to executives leaving the public sector to a level below £100,000. Trouble rating: 1/5
National insurance contributions Bill/finance Bill
The Tories’ election promise of a five-year “tax lock”, guaranteeing no increases in income tax, national insurance or VAT, is put into force. Trouble rating: 1/5
Cities and local government devolution Bill
This paves the way for directly elected “city region” mayors, with sweeping powers over transport, policing and economic development. Trouble rating: 2/5
Scotland Bill
This implements the Smith Commission’s recommendations on further Scottish devolution, but does not go far enough for the SNP, which demands protection from further UK-wide cuts. Trouble rating: 4/5
English votes for English laws
Not a matter for legislation, but the Government wants to change parliamentary standing orders to ensure no laws can be passed only affecting England without the “consent” of a majority of English MPs. But trouble could come if “consent” means Scottish and Welsh MPs would not be able to use their vote to “block” English-only legislation. Trouble rating: 3/5
European Union referendum Bill
Paves the way for an in/out EU referendum by 2017. It is now being supported by Labour, but the opposition wants to widen the franchise to 16 and 17 year-olds. Trouble rating: 2/5
Childcare Bill
Free childcare is doubled to 30 hours a week from 2017 for the working parents of three and four-year-olds. Trouble rating: 2/5
Housing Bill
Some 1.3 million housing association tenants will be given the chance to buy their homes at a large discount, while local authorities will have to sell high-value empty properties and use the money to build more affordable homes. Trouble rating: 2/5
Immigration
An offence of illegal working will be created, and police will get the powers to seize wages paid to illegal immigrants. Trouble rating: 1/5
Energy Bill
This gives local communities in England and Wales a veto on new onshore wind farms. Trouble rating: 1/5
Trade union Bill
Union votes for strike action in essential public services will only be legal if a turnout of 50 per cent is reached. The Bill also promises to shake up the way unions pay their political levy to Labour and other parties by replacing the current opt-out system with a requirement to opt in. Trouble rating: 5/5
Education and adoption Bill
Ministers are given powers to turn “coasting schools” into academies and the adoption system is overhauled. Trouble rating: 1/5
HS2 Bill
Presses on with building a high-speed rail link between London and Birmingham. Trouble rating: 3/5
Police and criminal justice Bill
It limits the use of police bail without judicial approval, reforms the Police Federation and introduces sanctions on professionals who fail to raise the alarm about child abuse. Trouble rating: 1/5