This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/heather-hironimus-mother-fighting-to-stop-childs-circumcision-appears-in-court-in-florida-10259445.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Heather Hironimus: Mother fighting to stop child's circumcision appears in court in Florida Heather Hironimus: Mother fighting to stop child's circumcision appears in court in Florida
(about 5 hours later)
The long-running court battle of a Florida woman who went on the run with her son to avoid his circumcision reached court on Monday. The long-running court battle of a Florida woman who went on the run with her son to avoid his circumcision reached court with a judge questioning her right to the legal challenge.
A Florida federal court heard the case of Heather Hironimus, 31, who was arrested on Thursday in the dispute over the removal of her four-year-old child’s foreskin. US District Judge Kenneth Marra reacted with scepticism to the case put by the boy’s mother, Heather Hironimus, “Aren’t you really asking me to revisit and second-guess?” Marra said near the start of the 80-minute hearing in West Palm Beach.
She went missing with the boy nearly three months ago and, it is claimed, ignored a judge’s warnings that if she failed to appear in court and give consent for the circumcision to proceed, she faced jail. The mother went missing with the boy nearly three months ago and, it is claimed, ignored a judge’s warnings that if she failed to appear in court and give consent for the circumcision to proceed, she faced jail.
In a last attempt to stop the case, Thomas Hunker, who is representing Ms Hironimus, had submitted a motion for a restraining order against Ms Hironimus’ father. Ms Hironimus argues circumcision “will permanently and irreversibly mutilate” her son and brings the risk of “permanent brain damage or death”. In a last attempt to stop the case, Thomas Hunker, who is representing Ms Hironimus, had submitted a motion for a restraining order against Ms Hironimus’ father. Ms Hironimus argues circumcision “will permanently and irreversibly mutilate” her son and brings the risk of “permanent brain damage or death”. 
Her supporters said she was simply doing what she could to protect a child portrayed as “scared to death” of the procedure. Though Marra made no ruling, he was often incredulous as Ms Hironimus’ attorney, Thomas Hunker, contended the case could continue in federal court because it was filed on behalf of the boy.
After she initially failed to appear in court and went on the run, a judge charged her with contempt and issued an arrest warrant. Mr Hunker said the child’s interests were not fully and fairly represented in state court and that the boy had the right to make his own wishes known.
Ms Hironimus and the boy’s father, Dennis Nebus, had agreed to the boy’s circumcision but the mother later changed her mind. Judges sided with the father, but surgeons backed out on failing to get the mother’s consent.
AP