This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/7226589.stm

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Police 'can challenge pay deal' Go-ahead for police pay challenge
(about 1 hour later)
Police officers have been given permission to launch a High Court challenge to a government decision not to backdate their pay rise.Police officers have been given permission to launch a High Court challenge to a government decision not to backdate their pay rise.
Mr Justice Collins said he had "no hesitation" in ruling there was a case to apply for judicial review.Mr Justice Collins said he had "no hesitation" in ruling there was a case to apply for judicial review.
Police Federation lawyers are challenging a Home Office decision not to backdate a 2.5% pay rise for police in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.Police Federation lawyers are challenging a Home Office decision not to backdate a 2.5% pay rise for police in England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
The federation says the decision means the rise is only 1.9% in annual terms.The federation says the decision means the rise is only 1.9% in annual terms.
I don't think I would have had any hesitation granting permission Mr Justice Collins
Its lawyers told the High Court officers had a "legitimate expectation" they would receive the full 2.5% increase decided through the independent Police Arbitration Tribunal.Its lawyers told the High Court officers had a "legitimate expectation" they would receive the full 2.5% increase decided through the independent Police Arbitration Tribunal.
The court is probably the last avenue left open to us John FrancisPolice Federation
While officers in Scotland are having their 2.5% pay rise backdated to 1 September - the start of the police pay year - as the tribunal recommended, those in other areas are receiving it in full only from December.While officers in Scotland are having their 2.5% pay rise backdated to 1 September - the start of the police pay year - as the tribunal recommended, those in other areas are receiving it in full only from December.
This, officers say, will amount in annual terms to an increase of only 1.9%.This, officers say, will amount in annual terms to an increase of only 1.9%.
John Francis, general secretary of the Police Federation of England and Wales, said the judge's decision gave officers the chance to "challenge the betrayal of the Home Secretary in failing to make an award in line with the police arbitration tribunal". Both Home Secretary Jacqui Smith and Prime Minister Gordon Brown have argued the award is appropriate and is in line with inflation targets - in particular, it is within the government's 2% public sector pay limit.
Last month's peaceful march of more than 22,000 police officers in central London in protest over the decision did not "disguise the anger that is felt out there", he said. Giving the go-ahead for the challenge, Mr Justice Collins told the court: "I don't think I would have had any hesitation granting permission."
"The court is probably the last avenue left open to us," he added. Human rights
The hearing will take place before two judges on 15 April. The Police Federation is being joined by police superintendents and chief police officers in mounting the legal action, brought in the name of the staff side of the Police Negotiating Board (PNB).
They argue that Ms Smith does not have the power to overrule the pay tribunal's decision unless it is of "utmost national importance".
The court is probably the last avenue left open to us John FrancisPolice Federation
They are also mounting their challenge on the grounds that Ms Smith's decision was an "abuse of the PNB process" because she failed to inform the federation of her decision before announcing it.
The action also claims the human rights of police officers are being infringed because they are unable to strike over pay.
Jan Berry, chairwoman of the Police Federation in England and Wales, said the court's decision was "a positive step for the 140,000 police officers across England and Wales in their fight for fair pay".
"The fact that our application for a judicial review has been successful adds weight to what we have been saying all along - that the Home Secretary betrayed police officers by failing to honour the decision of the independent Police Arbitration Tribunal."
'Hot water'
More than 20,000 officers marched through Westminster last month in protest at the decision not to backdate their pay award.
John Francis, general secretary of the federation, added: "The court is probably the last avenue left open to us."
Liberal Democrat home affairs spokesman Chris Huhne said the government was "getting into more and more hot water on this police pay decision, because it is trying to defend the indefensible".
The two-day hearing will take place before two judges on 15 and 16 April.