This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/09/world/americas/toronto-orchestra-drops-pianist-over-tweets-about-ukraine.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Toronto Orchestra Drops Pianist Over Tweets About Ukraine Toronto Orchestra Drops Pianist Over Tweets About Ukraine
(about 20 hours later)
The Toronto Symphony Orchestra abruptly canceled a performance of Rachmaninoff’s Second Piano Concerto on Wednesday after parting ways with a Ukrainian soloist over concerns that her ribald Twitter commentary had crossed the line into “intolerance.”The Toronto Symphony Orchestra abruptly canceled a performance of Rachmaninoff’s Second Piano Concerto on Wednesday after parting ways with a Ukrainian soloist over concerns that her ribald Twitter commentary had crossed the line into “intolerance.”
The orchestra’s president, Jeff Melanson, said in a telephone interview that his staff had asked Valentina Lisitsa, the pianist who had been scheduled to perform, to explain dozens of inflammatory tweets in which she used vulgar imagery and language to attack Ukrainian nationalists. Ms. Lisitsa, he said, confirmed that she did write the messages posted on her account under the alias NedoUkraïnka, including one that mockingly compared Ukrainian teachers in traditional dress to African tribesmen.The orchestra’s president, Jeff Melanson, said in a telephone interview that his staff had asked Valentina Lisitsa, the pianist who had been scheduled to perform, to explain dozens of inflammatory tweets in which she used vulgar imagery and language to attack Ukrainian nationalists. Ms. Lisitsa, he said, confirmed that she did write the messages posted on her account under the alias NedoUkraïnka, including one that mockingly compared Ukrainian teachers in traditional dress to African tribesmen.
Ukrainian Internet activists, who call Ms. Lisitsa a supporter of Russian-backed separatists, celebrated the orchestra’s decision. They also pointed to a number of other tweets in which she seemed to echo Kremlin propaganda that Ukraine has been in the grip of bloodthirsty “Nazis” since protests toppled the pro-Russian president, Viktor F. Yanukovych, last year.Ukrainian Internet activists, who call Ms. Lisitsa a supporter of Russian-backed separatists, celebrated the orchestra’s decision. They also pointed to a number of other tweets in which she seemed to echo Kremlin propaganda that Ukraine has been in the grip of bloodthirsty “Nazis” since protests toppled the pro-Russian president, Viktor F. Yanukovych, last year.
Mr. Melanson said that the orchestra had tried to resolve the matter quietly by finding a replacement for Ms. Lisitsa as pianist late last week and paying her fee, but she went public on Monday, defending her right to use “satire and hyperbole” in online debates over the war in Ukraine. She also asked her fans to speak out against “censorship” by demanding that she be allowed to perform as scheduled.Mr. Melanson said that the orchestra had tried to resolve the matter quietly by finding a replacement for Ms. Lisitsa as pianist late last week and paying her fee, but she went public on Monday, defending her right to use “satire and hyperbole” in online debates over the war in Ukraine. She also asked her fans to speak out against “censorship” by demanding that she be allowed to perform as scheduled.
Writing on Facebook, Ms. Lisitsa insisted that the only aim of her Twitter feed was “to get the other side of the story heard, the one you never see in the mainstream media — the plight of my people, the good and bad things that were happening in Ukraine.”Writing on Facebook, Ms. Lisitsa insisted that the only aim of her Twitter feed was “to get the other side of the story heard, the one you never see in the mainstream media — the plight of my people, the good and bad things that were happening in Ukraine.”
The pianist attributed the backlash against her to what she called the success of her efforts to expose the suffering caused by Ukrainian government forces and the anti-Russian bias of Western news media reports.The pianist attributed the backlash against her to what she called the success of her efforts to expose the suffering caused by Ukrainian government forces and the anti-Russian bias of Western news media reports.
“I translated news stories from Ukrainian language websites, I translated eyewitness accounts of atrocities,” she said. “I became really good in unmasking fakes published by Western media in order to make one side of the civil war look whiter and softer than Easter bunny, and another — as sub-humans, not worthy of mercy, the ‘collateral damage.’ ”“I translated news stories from Ukrainian language websites, I translated eyewitness accounts of atrocities,” she said. “I became really good in unmasking fakes published by Western media in order to make one side of the civil war look whiter and softer than Easter bunny, and another — as sub-humans, not worthy of mercy, the ‘collateral damage.’ ”
Her fans and supporters of the rebel cause in Ukraine responded by flooding the orchestra’s Facebook page and Twitter mentions with outrage and heckling the local pianist lined up to replace Ms. Lisitsa, Stewart Goodyear.Her fans and supporters of the rebel cause in Ukraine responded by flooding the orchestra’s Facebook page and Twitter mentions with outrage and heckling the local pianist lined up to replace Ms. Lisitsa, Stewart Goodyear.
Writing on Facebook late Tuesday, Mr. Goodyear explained that he had decided to withdraw as a result of the “social media frenzy” surrounding the engagement.Writing on Facebook late Tuesday, Mr. Goodyear explained that he had decided to withdraw as a result of the “social media frenzy” surrounding the engagement.
“Words of bile and hatred were hurled in my direction,” he wrote. “Suddenly I was accused of supporting censorship, and bullied into declining this engagement. What started out as one of the happiest moments of my life turned into a shattering display of mob hysteria.”“Words of bile and hatred were hurled in my direction,” he wrote. “Suddenly I was accused of supporting censorship, and bullied into declining this engagement. What started out as one of the happiest moments of my life turned into a shattering display of mob hysteria.”
“With all due respect to the pianist who I was going to replace, one must own one’s opinions and words,” Mr. Goodyear added. “Her words offended many people who perceived her as pro-violence and anti-love.”“With all due respect to the pianist who I was going to replace, one must own one’s opinions and words,” Mr. Goodyear added. “Her words offended many people who perceived her as pro-violence and anti-love.”
Ms. Lisitsa, a naturalized American citizen who moved to the United States in 1991, just before the collapse of the Soviet Union gave rise to an independent Ukraine, embodies some of the complexity of Ukrainian identity politics. While calling herself “an ethnic Ukrainian,” as the daughter of a Ukrainian father and a Russian-Polish mother, she grew up speaking Russian and considers the use of force by the government in Kiev against Russian-backed separatists an outrage. She named her Twitter feed NedoUkraïnka, or SubUkrainian, after reading that the post-revolutionary prime minister in Kiev had referred to Russian-backed rebels as “subhumans.” Ms. Lisitsa, a naturalized American citizen who moved to the United States in 1991, just before the collapse of the Soviet Union gave rise to an independent Ukraine, embodies some of the complexity of Ukrainian identity politics. While calling herself “an ethnic Ukrainian,” as the daughter of a Ukrainian father and a Russian-Polish mother, she grew up speaking Russian and considers the use of force by the government in Kiev against Russian-backed separatists an outrage. She named her Twitter feed NedoUkraïnka, or SubUkrainian, after reading a disputed translation of comments by the post-revolutionary prime minister in Kiev which suggested that he had referred to Russian-backed rebels as “subhumans.”
Speaking by telephone from a hotel outside Toronto on Tuesday, Ms. Lisitsa said that she hoped to find a site to perform for her fans, even without the orchestra. As to who, exactly, her accusers were, she said, “I am in the dark.” The orchestra, she said, had refused her request to meet with anyone offended by her Twitter commentary in an attempt to defuse the tension.Speaking by telephone from a hotel outside Toronto on Tuesday, Ms. Lisitsa said that she hoped to find a site to perform for her fans, even without the orchestra. As to who, exactly, her accusers were, she said, “I am in the dark.” The orchestra, she said, had refused her request to meet with anyone offended by her Twitter commentary in an attempt to defuse the tension.
Ms. Lisitsa, who now lives in Paris, said that her use of vulgar illustrations on Twitter was partly inspired by French satire. She said that one of the tweets the orchestra had particularly objected to was a scatological cartoon she had adapted from Charlie Hebdo, the satirical weekly, to illustrate, in crude terms, the idea that the Western media were being fed lies about Russian involvement in Ukraine concocted by Ukrainian intelligence and the Central Intelligence Agency.Ms. Lisitsa, who now lives in Paris, said that her use of vulgar illustrations on Twitter was partly inspired by French satire. She said that one of the tweets the orchestra had particularly objected to was a scatological cartoon she had adapted from Charlie Hebdo, the satirical weekly, to illustrate, in crude terms, the idea that the Western media were being fed lies about Russian involvement in Ukraine concocted by Ukrainian intelligence and the Central Intelligence Agency.
She also argued that she had been singled out by supporters of the government in Kiev for her role in helping to expose the neo-Nazi sympathies of some of the Ukrainian volunteers fighting Russian-backed separatists. After Elle magazine published a photo spread late last year featuring several young Ukrainian women in camouflage, Ms. Lisitsa discovered that the woman on the title page, Vita Zaverukha, had previously posted images of herself on social media making the Nazi salute and wearing a swastika.She also argued that she had been singled out by supporters of the government in Kiev for her role in helping to expose the neo-Nazi sympathies of some of the Ukrainian volunteers fighting Russian-backed separatists. After Elle magazine published a photo spread late last year featuring several young Ukrainian women in camouflage, Ms. Lisitsa discovered that the woman on the title page, Vita Zaverukha, had previously posted images of herself on social media making the Nazi salute and wearing a swastika.
Ms. Lisitsa also suggested that Ukrainian activists had been angered by her impassioned defense of another artist, the Russian soprano Anna Netrebko, who was criticized for expressing sympathy for civilians in Donetsk, a separatist-controlled city in eastern Ukraine.Ms. Lisitsa also suggested that Ukrainian activists had been angered by her impassioned defense of another artist, the Russian soprano Anna Netrebko, who was criticized for expressing sympathy for civilians in Donetsk, a separatist-controlled city in eastern Ukraine.
In December, Ms. Netrebko donated a million rubles — more than $18,000 — to the opera house in Donetsk, and was photographed handing the check to Oleg Tsarov, a separatist politician, at a news conference in Russia. She then posed for photographs with him while holding a separatist flag.In December, Ms. Netrebko donated a million rubles — more than $18,000 — to the opera house in Donetsk, and was photographed handing the check to Oleg Tsarov, a separatist politician, at a news conference in Russia. She then posed for photographs with him while holding a separatist flag.
Although the money reportedly made its way to civilians in Donetsk, Ukrainian activists tried, and failed, to persuade the Metropolitan Opera to cancel all future performances by Ms. Netrebko over the donation. In a statement rejecting the request, a representative of the New York opera house wrote that “the Met does not have to be in agreement with the personal views of the artists who perform on its stage.”Although the money reportedly made its way to civilians in Donetsk, Ukrainian activists tried, and failed, to persuade the Metropolitan Opera to cancel all future performances by Ms. Netrebko over the donation. In a statement rejecting the request, a representative of the New York opera house wrote that “the Met does not have to be in agreement with the personal views of the artists who perform on its stage.”
As Ms. Netrebko was being showered with applause after performing in the title role of Tchaikovsky’s “Iolanta” in late January, a Ukrainian protester, Roman Torgovitsky, burst onto the Metropolitan stage carrying a placard calling her and the conductor for the performance, Valery Gergiev, “active contributors to Putin’s war against Ukraine.”As Ms. Netrebko was being showered with applause after performing in the title role of Tchaikovsky’s “Iolanta” in late January, a Ukrainian protester, Roman Torgovitsky, burst onto the Metropolitan stage carrying a placard calling her and the conductor for the performance, Valery Gergiev, “active contributors to Putin’s war against Ukraine.”