This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/england/london/7219097.stm
The article has changed 12 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Version 5 | Version 6 |
---|---|
Win for disability rights woman | Win for disability rights woman |
(10 minutes later) | |
A woman who said she was "harassed" into resigning from her job because she has a disabled son has won the latest round in her discrimination case. | |
A European Court of Justice judge agreed that Sharon Coleman suffered "discrimination by association". | A European Court of Justice judge agreed that Sharon Coleman suffered "discrimination by association". |
She claimed her former London employers Attridge Law described her as "lazy" for wanting time off to care for her son. | She claimed her former London employers Attridge Law described her as "lazy" for wanting time off to care for her son. |
Campaigners have said the case may help provide protection for other carers. | Campaigners have said the case may help provide protection for other carers. |
Ms Coleman said her manager had commented that her child was always sick, and had accused her of trying to use his condition to get out of work. | |
She said she was overjoyed the case - which had been heard by an appeal tribunal - was being heard by the European Court. | |
When they heard that my son Oliver had a serious illness, they didn't expect me to return to work Sharon Coleman | |
"I was upset and shocked at the attitude of my former employers. They knew about my son's problems because I took him into the office, but they wouldn't allow me to work flexibly to make it easier to look after him," she said. | |
"Other members of staff were taking time off for hospital appointments or worked from home but my requests were always turned down. | |
"When they heard that my son Oliver had a serious illness, they didn't expect me to return to work." | |
Since the UK instituted the Human Rights Act, few cases have been referred to Europe. | |
However, in this case the EU's Equal Treatment Directive's interpretation of disability discrimination is much wider than the UK's - in Europe, the person does not have to suffer from the disability themselves but could be the parent or spouse of a disabled person. | |
Carers UK chief executive Imelda Redmond said: "This case has profound implications for the one in five carers who give up work to care and face discrimination at work as a direct consequence of caring." |