This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/01/world/middleeast/iran-nuclear-talks.html

The article has changed 8 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 4 Version 5
Nuclear Talks With Iran Could Extend to Wednesday, Negotiators Say Iran Nuclear Talks Extended to Wednesday, Negotiators Say
(about 2 hours later)
LAUSANNE, Switzerland — With a deadline just hours away, negotiators from the United States, Iran and five other nations appeared on Tuesday to be struggling to move closer to a preliminary accord to limit Tehran’s nuclear program, and signaled that they might be prepared to work into Wednesday. LAUSANNE, Switzerland — Negotiators from the United States, Iran and five other nations extended their deadline until Wednesday as they struggled to agree on a preliminary accord to limit Tehran’s nuclear program.
Even if an agreement is struck, there have been signs that several of the most difficult issues will be deferred for a final agreement in three months. With a previously enunciated deadline just hours away, and after a full day of talks with most of the foreign ministers from the seven countries involved in the negotiations, an American official said that they were still working to resolve several issues.
After working for a full day with foreign ministers from most of the seven nations involved in the talks — the exception was Sergey V. Lavrov, Russia’s foreign minister, who arrived in the afternoon after declaring “the chances are high” for an agreement — a senior State Department official indicated that progress had been insufficient. “We’ve made enough progress in the last days to merit staying until Wednesday,” said Marie Harf, a State Department spokeswoman. “There are several difficult issues remaining.”
“We will of course keep working if we are continuing to make progress,” the official said in an email, “including into tomorrow, if it’s useful to do so.”
Another Western official, who asked not to be identified in order to discuss closed-door talks, said that the negotiations on Tuesday had been difficult.Another Western official, who asked not to be identified in order to discuss closed-door talks, said that the negotiations on Tuesday had been difficult.
Plans to make some kind of announcement enumerating areas of agreement after a week of intensive talks appeared to be delayed. Plans to make some kind of announcement enumerating areas of agreement after a week of intensive talks were delayed.
Any accord that is reached will be, by design, an interim instrument that might be devoid of some specifics that the United States Congress, Israel, Arab states, and Iran’s military and hard-liners have been worried about.Any accord that is reached will be, by design, an interim instrument that might be devoid of some specifics that the United States Congress, Israel, Arab states, and Iran’s military and hard-liners have been worried about.
The March 31 deadline was established three months ago as a mechanism to determine whether there was enough political will to reach a final accord by the end of June, when an interim agreement temporarily limiting Iran’s activities expires.The March 31 deadline was established three months ago as a mechanism to determine whether there was enough political will to reach a final accord by the end of June, when an interim agreement temporarily limiting Iran’s activities expires.
Just days ago, Iran seemed intransigent on several major issues. It wanted United Nations sanctions to be lifted almost immediately, while the United States and its negotiating partners wanted any relaxation to be gradual — to ensure that Iran takes steps that would make it far harder to produce bomb-grade material in less than a year, and as it answers long-evaded questions from international inspectors.Just days ago, Iran seemed intransigent on several major issues. It wanted United Nations sanctions to be lifted almost immediately, while the United States and its negotiating partners wanted any relaxation to be gradual — to ensure that Iran takes steps that would make it far harder to produce bomb-grade material in less than a year, and as it answers long-evaded questions from international inspectors.
On Monday, the State Department acknowledged that a central question, the disposition of Iran’s large stockpile of nuclear fuel, remained a subject of debate.On Monday, the State Department acknowledged that a central question, the disposition of Iran’s large stockpile of nuclear fuel, remained a subject of debate.
“The bottom line is that we don’t have agreement with the Iranians on the stockpile issue,” a State Department spokeswoman, Marie Harf, told reporters. Western officials here suggested that the issue might be categorized a technical question and kicked down the road to the June final agreement. “The bottom line is that we don’t have agreement with the Iranians on the stockpile issue,” Ms. Harf told reporters. Western officials here suggested that the issue might be categorized a technical question and kicked down the road to the June final agreement.
“One person is missing here: It’s Ayatollah Khamenei,” a senior European diplomat, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said late on Monday, referring to the Iranian supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. “We don’t know what he will think of the provisions.”“One person is missing here: It’s Ayatollah Khamenei,” a senior European diplomat, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said late on Monday, referring to the Iranian supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. “We don’t know what he will think of the provisions.”
Also missing is Congress, which has pledged to impose additional sanctions if a preliminary accord is not reached — a threat that may lead the Obama administration to solidify what it can get now and seek more in the next three months.Also missing is Congress, which has pledged to impose additional sanctions if a preliminary accord is not reached — a threat that may lead the Obama administration to solidify what it can get now and seek more in the next three months.
The nations involved in the talks with Iran are Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States. Mr. Lavrov was the only chief diplomat from those countries who was not present here on Tuesday morning, and it had been thought that he would return if an accord was likely to be announced. The nations involved in the talks with Iran are Britain, China, France, Germany, Russia and the United States. The Russian foreign minister, Sergey V. Lavrov was the only chief diplomat from those countries who was not here on Tuesday morning, and it had been thought that he would return if an accord was likely to be announced.
Frank-Walter Steinmeier, the German foreign minister, reinforced the sense of progress when he said Friday morning that the talks had been in something of a crisis but that negotiators seemed to have settled on “a bit of a new approach.”Frank-Walter Steinmeier, the German foreign minister, reinforced the sense of progress when he said Friday morning that the talks had been in something of a crisis but that negotiators seemed to have settled on “a bit of a new approach.”
But if an accord is announced on Tuesday or Wednesday, it may be as noteworthy for what it leaves out as for what it includes.But if an accord is announced on Tuesday or Wednesday, it may be as noteworthy for what it leaves out as for what it includes.
The issues the negotiators have been struggling to resolve include the pace at which United Nations sanctions would be lifted, restrictions on research and development related to new types of centrifuges, and the length of the agreement.The issues the negotiators have been struggling to resolve include the pace at which United Nations sanctions would be lifted, restrictions on research and development related to new types of centrifuges, and the length of the agreement.