This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/27/meredith-kercher-amanda-knox-and-raffaele-sollecito-acquitted

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Meredith Kercher murder: Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito acquitted Meredith Kercher murder: Amanda Knox and Raffaele Sollecito acquitted
(35 minutes later)
The trial of Amanda Knox and her former boyfriend, Raffaele Sollecito, for the killing of British student Meredith Kercher has ended in a stunning acquittal after Italy’s highest court decided to annul their murder convictions. The trial of Amanda Knox and her former boyfriend Raffaele Sollecito for the killing of British student Meredith Kercher has ended in a stunning acquittal after Italy’s highest court decided to annul their murder convictions.
The decision by a five-judge panel on Friday night to clear the pair definitively ends a case that began The decision by a five-judge panel on Friday night to clear the pair definitively ends a case that began when the body of Kercher, a 21-year-old Leeds University student from Coulsdon, Surrey, was found in the bedroom of the flat she shared with Knox in Perugia on the morning of 2 November 2007. Her throat had been slashed and she had been sexually assaulted. She had been in the first weeks of an Erasmus year in the Umbrian hilltop town.
when the body of Kercher, a 21-year-old Leeds University student from Coulsdon, Surrey, was found in the bedroom of the flat she shared with Knox in Perugia on the morning of 2 November 2007. She had been in the first weeks of a student exchange year in the Umbrian hilltop town.
Related: Amanda Knox murder conviction annulled - live coverageRelated: Amanda Knox murder conviction annulled - live coverage
Most legal experts had expected that both of the defendants’ prior murder convictions would be upheld, or that Sollecito alone would be granted a new trial. But the decision to acquit both underscored the persistent questions that surrounded the case from the moment the pair were arrested for Kercher’s murder. Through her lawyer, Knox, who is in Seattle, told the Guardian: “I am tremendously relieved and grateful for the decision of the supreme court of Italy. The knowledge of my innocence has given me strength in the darkest times of this ordeal.
Attorneys for both Knox and Sollecito forcefully argued that the facts did not add up, the evidence was tainted, there was a lack of a clear motive and that Italian investigators had pursued the case as if it was a witch hunt. “And throughout this ordeal, I have received invaluable support from family, friends, and strangers. To them, I say: thank you from the bottom of my heart. Your kindness has sustained me. I only wish that I could thank each and every one of you in person.”
Through her lawyer, Amanda Knox told the Guardian: “I am tremendously relieved and grateful for the decision of the supreme court of Italy. The knowledge of my innocence has given me strength in the darkest times of this ordeal. The Kercher family, who just last year expressed confidence in the Italian justice system and said that an affirmative verdict would help them move on with their lives, were not in court for the verdict. Arline Kercher, Meredith’s mother, said late on Friday night that she was “surprised and very shocked” by the court’s decision.
“And throughout this ordeal, I have received invaluable support from family, friends, and strangers. To them, I say: Thank you from the bottom of my heart. Your kindness has sustained me. I only wish that I could thank each and every one of you in person.” Francesco Maresca, the lawyer for the Kercher family, said: “I think that it’s a defeat for the Italian justice system.”
In a separate statement, Knox’s family said: “We want to express our profound gratitude to all of those who have supported Amanda and our family. Countless people – from world-renowned DNA experts, to former FBI agents, to everyday citizens committed to justice – have spoken about her innocence.” Related: Kercher family have a bitter pill to swallow after verdict
“We are thrilled with and grateful for today’s decision from the supreme court of Italy. And we are grateful beyond measure for all that so many of you have done for her.” The decision means that legally only one man is considered guilty of Kercher’s murder: Rudy Guede, a drifter from Ivory Coast who is nearly halfway through a 16-year prison sentence for her murder following a fast-track trial in 2008. At the time of his conviction, it was stated that he did not act alone.
On Friday night the lawyer for the family of Meredith Kercher, Francesco Maresca, told the Guardian there would be no statement made immediately. They were not understood to be in Rome for the verdict. Most legal experts had expected that both of the defendants’ prior murder convictions would be upheld, or that Sollecito alone would be granted a new trial because of weak evidence against him.But the decision to acquit both underscored the persistent questions that surrounded the case from the moment the pair were arrested.Lawyers for both Knox, 27, and Sollecito, 31, forcefully argued that the facts did not add up, that the evidence was tainted, that there was a lack of a clear motive, and that Italian investigators had pursued the case as if it were a witch-hunt.The judges agreed: in their verdict, they did not just state that there was not enough evidence to convict the pair. They said that neither Knox nor Sollecito had killed Kercher. The full rationale behind the decision will be released within 90 days.
The judges reached their decision after 10 hours of deliberations. The presiding judge Gennaro Marasca, read the verdict –repeating the word “annulled” several times - and the court and assembled journalists, including many who are not native Italian speakers, initially fell silent. On Wednesday, the first day of the high court hearing, the chief prosecutor in the case asked the judges to uphold the verdict, saying that all the characters in the story fit together as part of a “perfect reconstruction”, like in a photograph by Henri Cartier-Bresson. But that argument was flatly rejected.
Then there was a burst of activity as Giulia Bongiorno, Sollecito’s lawyer and one of the most famous defence attorneys in Italy, began to scream and run out of the courtroom, even as journalists chased behind her. The judges reached their decision after 10 hours of deliberations. The presiding judge, Gennaro Marasca, read the decision – repeating the word “annulled” several times. Initially, the tense assembly of lawyers and journalists, including many who are not native Italian speakers, fell silent.
When a seemingly stunned Carlo Della Vedova, the lawyer for Knox, came out of the courtroom behind her, she leapt into his arms and the two embraced. Then there was a burst of activity as many went racing out of the grand courtroom, ready to call in the news, even as journalists desperately looked at one another, wondering if their ears had failed them.
Even as he walked toward the exit, Della Vedova remained contained, saying in a hushed tone that such a bold decision was nearly unprecedented. Giulia Bongiorno, Sollecito’s lawyer, who has solidified her reputation as one of the best defence attorneys in Italy, began screaming in joy and ran out of the courtroom, journalists chasing behind her.
Minutes later, he emerged from the court of cassation in Rome and told the swarm of journalists that he had spoken to Knox, saying that she was “very happy”. When a seemingly stunned Carlo Dalla Vedova, the lawyer for Knox, came out of the courtroom behind her, she turned around and leapt into his arms and the two embraced. He had arrived shortly before the judges announced their decision, carrying his robe in a black gym bag.
Earlier in the day, Bongiorno had dramatically called for the annulment of the charges against her client, saying that Sollecito was a hapless victim of circumstance.
“He is an innocent who got wrapped up in spectacular and gigantic events that, like Forrest Gump, he did not fully realise. Absolve him,” she said in her final argument before the judges.
Related: Amanda Knox acquittal greeted with cheers and fireworks in West Seattle
After the decision was read, Dalla Vedova remained calm, slowly walking down the corridor toward the lift. In a hushed tone he said that such a bold decision was nearly unprecedented. Indeed, he had largely dismissed such a result before the court of cassation hearing began in Rome, saying it was practically unthinkable.
Minutes later, he emerged from the court, which overlooks Piazza Cavour, and told the swarm of journalists that he had spoken to Knox and that she was “very happy”.
“It’s a fair verdict. It’s a victory of justice. This was a mistake from the beginning,” he said.“It’s a fair verdict. It’s a victory of justice. This was a mistake from the beginning,” he said.
Although all the murder and sexual assault charges against the pair were dropped, the court did uphold one earlier conviction against Knox. It reaffirmed the charge that she falsely accused her former boss, Patrick Lumumba, a black pub owner, of murder. Lumumba was in jail for two weeks before he was exonerated. Both Knox and Sollecito have long claimed they were innocent.
The decision will be seen by some critics as an indictment of the Italian justice system. Knox and Sollecito served four years in prison before their initial 2009 convictions were overturned by an appeal court. Knox returned home to the US in 2011 as a free woman. But that decision was later vacated and the pair were found guilty of murder – again – by a court last year. If the court of cassation had affirmed that ruling, it would have left the pair with no other options.
Critics, particularly in the US, have said the trial and retrial smacked of double jeopardy, when a defendant is tried for the same crime twice. But Italian legal experts have defended their multitiered system, saying it provided protections both to the state, which can pursue a case even after an initial acquittal by a lower court, and defendants, who have several chances to retry their cases.
The decision allows Italy to avoid what might have been a messy diplomatic scuffle with the US. If Knox’s conviction had been upheld, Italy would likely have sought the extradition of the American university student to serve out the remainder of her 28-and-a-half-year prison sentence. The two countries share an extradition treaty that would have compelled the US to comply, with few allowable exceptions.
Although all the murder and sexual assault charges against the pair were dropped, the court did uphold one earlier conviction against Knox. It reaffirmed the charge that she had falsely accused her former boss Patrick Lumumba, a black pub owner, of murder. Lumumba was in jail for two weeks before he was exonerated. The charge carried a three-year jail sentence, but is moot because of the time Knox already spent in jail.
Earlier, Lumumba said he wanted an apology from Knox. He was the second victim in the crime, he said. The first, was “poor Meredith”.