This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/sport/blog/2015/mar/26/steve-smith-australia-world-cup
The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
| Version 0 | Version 1 |
|---|---|
| Steve Smith lets his bat do the talking again as Australia stride on imperiously | Steve Smith lets his bat do the talking again as Australia stride on imperiously |
| (about 1 hour later) | |
| For the last time in this seemingly endless golden summer, Steve Smith proved the difference between Australia and India. In his misleadingly assured 105 from 93 balls his batting seemed spoken in a different language than everyone else who followed. Australia’s 95-run win sets up a World Cup final encounter with New Zealand at the MCG. | For the last time in this seemingly endless golden summer, Steve Smith proved the difference between Australia and India. In his misleadingly assured 105 from 93 balls his batting seemed spoken in a different language than everyone else who followed. Australia’s 95-run win sets up a World Cup final encounter with New Zealand at the MCG. |
| In Sydney, Smith and the less fluent Aaron Finch (81) did well to counter Mohammed Shami, Mohit Sharma and Umesh Yadav, milking them for six, seven and eight apiece respectively at the business end of a tournament in which their frugality had been the bedrock of India’s success. | In Sydney, Smith and the less fluent Aaron Finch (81) did well to counter Mohammed Shami, Mohit Sharma and Umesh Yadav, milking them for six, seven and eight apiece respectively at the business end of a tournament in which their frugality had been the bedrock of India’s success. |
| Related: Virat Kohli and co caught short as India fail to banish ghost of World Cups past | Dileep Premachandran | |
| This game and Smith’s role in it was a decent metaphor for some prevailing trends in Australia’s batting line-up; he may wear a perma-smile but Michael Clarke must now slot himself in around the momentum of other batsmen and them adjust according to his. In the meantime, Smith has become the man Australia want at the crease for as long as possible when a game like this one is at stake. His talismanic presence is beyond repute now; Australia won every ODI in which he’s passed the half-century mark. | This game and Smith’s role in it was a decent metaphor for some prevailing trends in Australia’s batting line-up; he may wear a perma-smile but Michael Clarke must now slot himself in around the momentum of other batsmen and them adjust according to his. In the meantime, Smith has become the man Australia want at the crease for as long as possible when a game like this one is at stake. His talismanic presence is beyond repute now; Australia won every ODI in which he’s passed the half-century mark. |
| The result should have been a formality once Australia had posted 328 for 7 from their full allotment. No less than 28 times has a side posted a 300-plus score in this tournament now, but only two of those were in successful chases. Often has been the observation that one-day international cricket has moved into new realms as a power-based game and two hard balls, batsman-friendly fielding restrictions, Popeye forearms and weapons-grade bat designs certainly are a heady mix. | The result should have been a formality once Australia had posted 328 for 7 from their full allotment. No less than 28 times has a side posted a 300-plus score in this tournament now, but only two of those were in successful chases. Often has been the observation that one-day international cricket has moved into new realms as a power-based game and two hard balls, batsman-friendly fielding restrictions, Popeye forearms and weapons-grade bat designs certainly are a heady mix. |
| Yet Smith’s innings was anything but the broad-shouldered destruction of bowlers that’s occurred elsewhere. So evasively did he shuffle around the wicket and flick the ball off his pads that even India’s steadfast adherence to a leg-stump line – successful in a pre-tournament scratch match – proved not only futile but counterproductive. Dismissing him at the moment is like trying to jump into the driver’s seat of a car as it rolls downhill at ever-increasing speed. | Yet Smith’s innings was anything but the broad-shouldered destruction of bowlers that’s occurred elsewhere. So evasively did he shuffle around the wicket and flick the ball off his pads that even India’s steadfast adherence to a leg-stump line – successful in a pre-tournament scratch match – proved not only futile but counterproductive. Dismissing him at the moment is like trying to jump into the driver’s seat of a car as it rolls downhill at ever-increasing speed. |
| Smith’s footwork is exemplary but it’s his hands that are really extraordinary. If you’d mentally removed the bat from the equation at times in this innings, the sideways contortions of Smith’s body and the extravagant flick of the hands to square leg had more in common with the motion of a busy scrum-half firing out a pass. | Smith’s footwork is exemplary but it’s his hands that are really extraordinary. If you’d mentally removed the bat from the equation at times in this innings, the sideways contortions of Smith’s body and the extravagant flick of the hands to square leg had more in common with the motion of a busy scrum-half firing out a pass. |
| He also picked his targets. Umesh Yadav was under Smith’s constant surveillance in the knowledge that he’d give at least one loose delivery per over, five of which the Australian dispatched to the boundary. Conversely, Ravi Ashwin was treated with a degree of deference and pushed mainly for singles. Smith’s 182-run stand with Finch dwarfed all others in the game by at least 100 and proved decisive, though by comparison his partner looked like he was batting in sand at times. | He also picked his targets. Umesh Yadav was under Smith’s constant surveillance in the knowledge that he’d give at least one loose delivery per over, five of which the Australian dispatched to the boundary. Conversely, Ravi Ashwin was treated with a degree of deference and pushed mainly for singles. Smith’s 182-run stand with Finch dwarfed all others in the game by at least 100 and proved decisive, though by comparison his partner looked like he was batting in sand at times. |
| In recent years we’ve lamented the passing into retirement of some batting greats in Sachin Tendulkar, Ricky Ponting, Rahul Dravid and now Kumar Sangakkara, but the new generation of Smith, AB de Villiers and Virat Kohli have brought with them an entirely new batting vocabulary and pushed things along. Seeing them pile up hundreds at this World Cup has rammed that home. | |
| Related: 2015 Cricket World Cup: Australia v India – in pictures | |
| Smith’s serenity at the crease in this match might actually gloss over a few problems; Finch’s stodgy efforts to work his way back into form is possibly less a concern than David Warner’s current inability to stay at the crease at all. In Warner’s five innings as an opener (he dropped down the order against Scotland) either side of his hammering of a fatigued and fading Afghani attack, he’s lasted an average of 20 deliveries per innings. It wouldn’t be such a concern if Finch was running riot. | Smith’s serenity at the crease in this match might actually gloss over a few problems; Finch’s stodgy efforts to work his way back into form is possibly less a concern than David Warner’s current inability to stay at the crease at all. In Warner’s five innings as an opener (he dropped down the order against Scotland) either side of his hammering of a fatigued and fading Afghani attack, he’s lasted an average of 20 deliveries per innings. It wouldn’t be such a concern if Finch was running riot. |
| Though Australia didn’t always look comfortable in the early stages of India’s chase, the game eventually became a series of familiar tropes, the same batsmen passing by the same bowlers in a pattern as predictable as kit bags on airport baggage carousels. Glenn Maxwell probably sees more of his opponents in this game than his teammates in domestic ranks for Victoria. | Though Australia didn’t always look comfortable in the early stages of India’s chase, the game eventually became a series of familiar tropes, the same batsmen passing by the same bowlers in a pattern as predictable as kit bags on airport baggage carousels. Glenn Maxwell probably sees more of his opponents in this game than his teammates in domestic ranks for Victoria. |
| After the high-tempo start of Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli, India’s innings fell in a disappointing heap. Kohli’s torch was outshone in exaggerated style by Mitchell Johnson’s flamethrower. The latters’ brief but impactful state of arousal was something he’s rarely managed in this World Cup. What any of this tells us about Australia’s subsequent match-up against New Zealand is less clear. | After the high-tempo start of Rohit Sharma and Virat Kohli, India’s innings fell in a disappointing heap. Kohli’s torch was outshone in exaggerated style by Mitchell Johnson’s flamethrower. The latters’ brief but impactful state of arousal was something he’s rarely managed in this World Cup. What any of this tells us about Australia’s subsequent match-up against New Zealand is less clear. |
| Fittingly, it was when Smith athletically ran out Ravi Jadeja in the 42nd over that Australia looked convincingly home. He stood jubilant as his teammates swamped him, a familiar sight of the summer now but assuredly not the souvenir the Indians wanted to take home. | Fittingly, it was when Smith athletically ran out Ravi Jadeja in the 42nd over that Australia looked convincingly home. He stood jubilant as his teammates swamped him, a familiar sight of the summer now but assuredly not the souvenir the Indians wanted to take home. |