This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-32014025

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
City Link collapse exposes insolvency flaws, say MPs City Link collapse exposes insolvency flaws, say MPs
(35 minutes later)
The collapse of delivery firm City Link has exposed the flaws in the insolvency system, two groups of MPs have said.The collapse of delivery firm City Link has exposed the flaws in the insolvency system, two groups of MPs have said.
A joint report from two parliamentary committees concludes that the current system is too heavily skewed in favour of investors over workers.A joint report from two parliamentary committees concludes that the current system is too heavily skewed in favour of investors over workers.
It also said City Link took a "deliberate decision" not to inform employees of its likely failure.It also said City Link took a "deliberate decision" not to inform employees of its likely failure.
About 2,700 people lost their jobs when City Link collapsed over Christmas, and 1,000 contractors also lost out.About 2,700 people lost their jobs when City Link collapsed over Christmas, and 1,000 contractors also lost out.
"The current insolvency system fails to offer sufficient protection to workers, suppliers and contractors alike," said Adrian Bailey, chairman of the Business Committee."The current insolvency system fails to offer sufficient protection to workers, suppliers and contractors alike," said Adrian Bailey, chairman of the Business Committee.
"Investors and directors are cushioned from the impact of failure while workers, suppliers, and contractors pay the highest price. The balance needs to be shifted so that our insolvency system is no longer skewed in favour of investors and directors," he added."Investors and directors are cushioned from the impact of failure while workers, suppliers, and contractors pay the highest price. The balance needs to be shifted so that our insolvency system is no longer skewed in favour of investors and directors," he added.
The report says that under the current rules it is in the financial interest of a company to break the law and ignore the statutory redundancy consultation process, if the fine for doing so is less than the cost of continuing to trade. The fine will end up being paid by the taxpayer, it pointed out.The report says that under the current rules it is in the financial interest of a company to break the law and ignore the statutory redundancy consultation process, if the fine for doing so is less than the cost of continuing to trade. The fine will end up being paid by the taxpayer, it pointed out.
'Morally responsible'
The MPs recommend that the order in which money is paid out in insolvencies should be changed to give precedence to all workers, whether directly employed or not.
"While the financial calculation is simple, ignoring the consultation period has a high human cost that appears not to have featured in the decision making process at City Link," the report said."While the financial calculation is simple, ignoring the consultation period has a high human cost that appears not to have featured in the decision making process at City Link," the report said.
Irfan Khan was a subcontractor for City Link and lost at least £80,000 from the firm's collapse. He told Radio 5 live's Wake Up to Money that he had no idea that City Link was in difficulty and that he had invested in five new vehicles before Christmas.
"We've lost everything," he said. "It's killed our business."
He said he had been told that he would get back between zero and 2p per pound from what he is owed.
Mr Bailey said: "We are dismayed that, although it was clear for some time that there were serious questions over the ability to continue trading after December 2014, small businesses and self-employed drivers working for City Link were encouraged to take on additional costs, despite the company being aware that there was a strong possibility that they would not receive payment for a significant part of their work in December.Mr Bailey said: "We are dismayed that, although it was clear for some time that there were serious questions over the ability to continue trading after December 2014, small businesses and self-employed drivers working for City Link were encouraged to take on additional costs, despite the company being aware that there was a strong possibility that they would not receive payment for a significant part of their work in December.
"City Link and [owner] Better Capital are morally, if not legally, responsible for the difficulties that many of these individuals and small business now find themselves in," he added. "There is no doubt that contractors were deliberately deceived as to the true state of the business. City Link and [owner] Better Capital are morally, if not legally, responsible for the difficulties that many of these individuals and small business now find themselves in," he added.
Better Capital says the accusation that it deliberately deceived contractors is "ill-founded".Better Capital says the accusation that it deliberately deceived contractors is "ill-founded".