This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/northern_ireland/7208088.stm

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Catholic men win hotel bias case Catholic men win hotel bias case
(about 6 hours later)
Two Catholic employees sacked from a Belfast hotel have been awarded £27,000 damages for religious discrimination.Two Catholic employees sacked from a Belfast hotel have been awarded £27,000 damages for religious discrimination.
Riccardo Cafolla and Stephen Mooney were managers at Days Hotel until they were dismissed in June 2005.Riccardo Cafolla and Stephen Mooney were managers at Days Hotel until they were dismissed in June 2005.
The Fair Employment Tribunal said they were unfairly dismissed after they took a grievance procedure. The two men took their case to the Fair Employment Tribunal which found they had been discriminated against.
It followed loyalist attacks on the hotel after managers had disciplined staff. The attacks stopped after a meeting with the UDA.It followed loyalist attacks on the hotel after managers had disciplined staff. The attacks stopped after a meeting with the UDA.
Mr Cafolla was awarded £16,110 and Mr Mooney received £11,600.Mr Cafolla was awarded £16,110 and Mr Mooney received £11,600.
The tribunal said that senior management in the hotel at the time did not wish to instigate disciplinary action against a particular employee as they feared this would lead to more attacks on the hotel.The tribunal said that senior management in the hotel at the time did not wish to instigate disciplinary action against a particular employee as they feared this would lead to more attacks on the hotel.
It stated that the attacks "were sectarian and directed particularly to Catholic employees of the hotel".It stated that the attacks "were sectarian and directed particularly to Catholic employees of the hotel".
I was very upset to be dismissed when I knew we had done nothing to deserve it Stephen MooneyI was very upset to be dismissed when I knew we had done nothing to deserve it Stephen Mooney
It was satisfied that after the UDA meeting, serious attacks stopped but one of those employees disciplined continued to make comments to Mr Mooney.It was satisfied that after the UDA meeting, serious attacks stopped but one of those employees disciplined continued to make comments to Mr Mooney.
The tribunal decided that the two men had been disciplined after they told the company, Andras House, that they wished to begin a grievance procedure.The tribunal decided that the two men had been disciplined after they told the company, Andras House, that they wished to begin a grievance procedure.
Speaking after the FET decision was made public, Mr Cafolla said he felt "vindicated".Speaking after the FET decision was made public, Mr Cafolla said he felt "vindicated".
"My chief concern in all this was to try to ensure the safety of the staff in the hotel. I am pleased that the tribunal has vindicated what I did," he said."My chief concern in all this was to try to ensure the safety of the staff in the hotel. I am pleased that the tribunal has vindicated what I did," he said.
Mr Mooney said the attacks and threats were frightening.Mr Mooney said the attacks and threats were frightening.
"I was very upset to be dismissed when I knew we had done nothing to deserve it," he said."I was very upset to be dismissed when I knew we had done nothing to deserve it," he said.
Eileen Lavery of the Equality Commission, which supported the case, said the FET found the hotel management had treated some staff more leniently than others.Eileen Lavery of the Equality Commission, which supported the case, said the FET found the hotel management had treated some staff more leniently than others.
"To be dismissed following this dispute was unjustified and obviously distressing to the two men concerned. The tribunal has reflected that in their decision," she said."To be dismissed following this dispute was unjustified and obviously distressing to the two men concerned. The tribunal has reflected that in their decision," she said.
The hotel has refused to comment on the ruling.The hotel has refused to comment on the ruling.