This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/07/world/asia/obamas-public-encounter-with-the-dalai-lama-riles-china.html

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Obama’s Public Encounter With the Dalai Lama Riles China Prayer Breakfast Words Ruffle China and India
(about 14 hours later)
BEIJING — China and the United States have worked out a reliable pas de deux over the Dalai Lama, the Nobel laureate and Tibetan spiritual leader, whom Beijing sometimes describes as a “wolf in sheep’s clothing.” BEIJING — Prayer breakfast speeches in Washington are rarely, if ever, the source of bruised feelings overseas. Not so this year.
It goes like this: Chinese leaders warn the White House against granting the Dalai Lama a public audience, and the American president either ignores the threats of diplomatic fallout or finds a way to hold a meeting that will result in the least offense to Beijing. President Obama’s comments at this week’s religious gathering not only caused domestic problems — offending some conservative American Christians, who objected to the reference to “terrible deeds” during the Crusades — but have also left China and India piqued. The Chinese objected to the warmth shown to the Dalai Lama, while an Indian official reacted to the president’s remarks about acts of religious intolerance in the country by noting that India (read: not the United States) had openly supported the Dalai Lama for decades.
Since taking office, President Obama has met with the Dalai Lama on three occasions, each time within the privacy of the White House rather than during the kind of public event that might prompt outsize indignation on the part of Chinese leaders. For both India and China, the president’s remarks Thursday may have come as something of a surprise.
Then, on Thursday, Mr. Obama was handed a diplomatically novel way to express his admiration for the Dalai Lama when the two exchanged greetings at the annual National Prayer Breakfast in Washington and the president described him as a “good friend.” Just over a week ago, Mr. Obama completed a three-day visit to India aimed at reinvigorating a frayed relationship. And until this week, China and the United States had worked out a reliable pas de deux over the Dalai Lama, the Nobel laureate and Tibetan spiritual leader whom Beijing sometimes describes as a “wolf in sheep’s clothing.”
Video footage of the event showed Mr. Obama clasping his hands in a gesture of reverence and then waving at the Dalai Lama with a broad smile. In a speech, he described the 79-year-old exiled Buddhist leader as a “powerful example of what it means to practice compassion,” one “who inspired us to speak up for the freedom and dignity of all human beings.” It goes like this: Chinese leaders warn the White House against granting the Dalai Lama a public audience, and the American president either ignores the threats of diplomatic fallout or finds a way to meet that will result in the least offense to Beijing.
The highly public episode infuriated Beijing, which accused Mr. Obama of cynically orchestrating the encounter and suggested it was designed to complicate China’s governance of Tibet, the vast, strategically pivotal region that has bridled at Beijing’s heavy-handed rule since Communist troops invaded in 1950. Since taking office, President Obama had met with the Dalai Lama on three occasions, each time within the privacy of the White House rather than during the kind of public event that might prompt outsize indignation on the part of Chinese leaders. Then, on Thursday, Mr. Obama was handed a diplomatically novel way to express his admiration for the Dalai Lama when the two exchanged greetings at the annual National Prayer Breakfast in Washington and the president described him as a “good friend.”
“The Dalai Lama has over a long period of time used the banner of religion to engage in separatist, anti-Chinese activities as a political exile,” Hong Lei, a Foreign Ministry spokesman, said during a regular news conference on Friday. “We oppose any foreign country allowing the Dalai Lama to visit, and oppose any country using the issue of Tibet to interfere in China’s internal affairs.” In his speech, Mr. Obama described the 79-year-old exiled Buddhist leader, who lives in India, as a “powerful example of what it means to practice compassion,” one “who inspired us to speak up for the freedom and dignity of all human beings.”
In a commentary Friday, the state-run news agency Xinhua was more colorful. “This action by the U.S. to ‘drive a nail’ into the hearts of the Chinese people is harmful to the political trust between the two countries, and it is harmful to the premise and foundation of both sides building a new relationship,” it said. Both men were invited guests, but the highly public episode infuriated Beijing, which accused Mr. Obama of cynically orchestrating the encounter and suggested it was designed to complicate China’s governance of Tibet, the vast, strategically pivotal region that has bridled at Beijing’s rule since Communist troops invaded in 1950.
China typically reacts with petulance when a foreign leader meets the Dalai Lama, who is admired across much of the world but loathed by the Communist Party. China frequently accuses the Dalai Lama of promoting Tibetan independence, although he has repeatedly said he seeks only the autonomy long promised by Beijing. “We oppose any foreign country allowing the Dalai Lama to visit, and oppose any country using the issue of Tibet to interfere in China’s internal affairs,” Hong Lei, a Foreign Ministry spokesman, said Friday.
In recent years, as its economic and diplomatic stature has grown, China has had increasing success in persuading countries to publicly snub the Tibetan spiritual leader and, in some cases, deny him a visa. The state-run news agency Xinhua was more colorful. “This action by the U.S. to ‘drive a nail’ into the hearts of the Chinese people is harmful to the political trust between the two countries,” it said Friday.
But China’s latest effort to discourage an encounter between the Dalai Lama and Mr. Obama appears to have been doomed from the start, given the public nature of the event, to which both men were invited guests. China typically reacts angrily when a foreign leader meets with the Dalai Lama, whom it accuses of promoting Tibetan independence, although he has said he seeks only the autonomy promised by Beijing.
In a commentary published shortly before the event, Xinhua warned Mr. Obama against doing anything that might be interpreted as demonstrating respect for the Dalai Lama. “Chumming with a secessionist is playing with fire, which severely harms the mutual trust between China and the United States, and downgrades Obama’s credit as a national leader for breaking his commitments to China on the Tibet issue,” it said. If previous presidential meetings with the Dalai Lama are any guide, the harm to United States-China relations will be negligible. Still, Shi Yinhong, director of the Center for American Studies at Renmin University in Beijing, said that Chinese leaders believed they had no choice but to draw semantic lines in the sand. “If China doesn’t protest, then many other leaders would meet up with the Dalai Lama, and that would have a negative impact on our efforts to bring stability to Tibet,” he said.
Robert J. Barnett, director of the Modern Tibet Studies Program at Columbia University, said the White House had outmaneuvered China by declining to grant the Dalai Lama an official audience during his visit to Washington but demonstrating the president’s support through a public encounter that would resonate with rights advocates and Tibetan exile groups. The Indians’ reaction was more muted, but the incident may take away a bit of the shine on the relationship after Mr. Obama’s recent visit, which included a much-talked-about hug between the countries’ leaders.
Although China’s forceful and florid protests are largely aimed at showing its resolve to a domestic audience, Mr. Barnett said its public statements were unbecoming of a world power. “It makes them look tetchy and unreasonable,” he said, “and in the end, the Chinese allowed the Americans to walk them into a situation that doesn’t look good.” Mr. Obama had in fact managed a difficult feat while there: delivering a carefully calibrated speech that called for religious tolerance without kicking up a fuss, despite the sensitivities in India on the subject. The topic is an especially delicate one for India’s new prime minister, Narendra Modi, who was put on a United States visa blacklist in 2005 over his handling of deadly religious riots that took place in the state he then led.
If previous presidential meetings with the Dalai Lama are any guide, the harm to United States-China relations from the event on Thursday will be negligible. Still, Shi Yinhong, director of the Center for American Studies at Renmin University in Beijing, said that Chinese leaders believed they had no choice but to draw semantic lines in the sand. “If China doesn’t protest, then many other leaders would meet up with the Dalai Lama, and that would have a negative impact on our efforts to bring stability to Tibet,” he said. But on Thursday, Mr. Obama returned to the theme, saying that in recent years India had seen “acts of intolerance that would have shocked Gandhiji.”
This time, Indian news channels ran the story as top news, and two senior ministers issued public remarks. Finance Minister Arun Jaitley talked about India’s supportive relationship with the Dalai Lama — alluding, it seemed, to the fact that the United States treads gingerly in its support for the Tibetan leader, aware of China’s disapproval.
“It’s a part of India’s tolerance that even he found it comfortable and India found it comfortable to absorb him in the society,” he said, adding that India “has a huge cultural history of tolerance. Any aberration doesn’t alter the history.”
Open resentment issued from other quarters, including Hindu activists, some of whom resent Christian missionaries and who had, until now, supported Mr. Modi’s outreach to the United States. A leader of the Vishwa Hindu Parishad, a far-right-wing organization, called Mr. Obama “a stooge of the church.”
“Obama seems to like his natural allies more than his friend,” the group’s joint general secretary, Surendra Jain, told reporters on Friday, presumably referring to Mr. Modi.
An article in The Times of India called Mr. Obama’s words “an embarrassing smackdown” for a country that had received him “with euphoria.”