This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-31145600

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
NHS reorganisation was disastrous, says King's Fund NHS reorganisation was disastrous, says King's Fund
(about 2 hours later)
Radical changes to the way the NHS in England is organised have been "disastrous" and "distracted" from patient care, leading analysts say.Radical changes to the way the NHS in England is organised have been "disastrous" and "distracted" from patient care, leading analysts say.
The evaluation by the King's Fund think tank says the coalition government's changes had wasted three years, failed patients, caused financial distress and left a strategic vacuum.The evaluation by the King's Fund think tank says the coalition government's changes had wasted three years, failed patients, caused financial distress and left a strategic vacuum.
But it also says Labour is "crying wolf" over its privatisation claims.But it also says Labour is "crying wolf" over its privatisation claims.
The government said the report showed its plans for the future were right.The government said the report showed its plans for the future were right.
The behind-the-scenes changes may not have been immediately apparent to patients in GP surgeries.The behind-the-scenes changes may not have been immediately apparent to patients in GP surgeries.
But they were described by NHS leaders as "so big you could see them from space".But they were described by NHS leaders as "so big you could see them from space".
The changes, which came into force in 2013, abolished large numbers of NHS organisations.The changes, which came into force in 2013, abolished large numbers of NHS organisations.
Purse stringsPurse strings
The aim was to shift the balance of power in the NHS to give GPs more say over the way budgets were spent.The aim was to shift the balance of power in the NHS to give GPs more say over the way budgets were spent.
It provoked uproar in sections of the medical profession, in part over the role of potential privatisation of some services.It provoked uproar in sections of the medical profession, in part over the role of potential privatisation of some services.
King's Fund chief executive Chris Ham told the BBC: "People in the NHS focused on rearranging the deckchairs rather than the core business of improving patient care.King's Fund chief executive Chris Ham told the BBC: "People in the NHS focused on rearranging the deckchairs rather than the core business of improving patient care.
"That's contributed to the increasing waiting times and declining performance that patients are experiencing.""That's contributed to the increasing waiting times and declining performance that patients are experiencing."
He described the reforms as simply "disastrous" and said that only in the past two years had the government got its focus right.He described the reforms as simply "disastrous" and said that only in the past two years had the government got its focus right.
However Andrew Lansley, who was the health secretary behind the changes, said patient care had been improved, and patients "will continue to see the results" of the reforms.However Andrew Lansley, who was the health secretary behind the changes, said patient care had been improved, and patients "will continue to see the results" of the reforms.
'Bewildering''Bewildering'
During the reorganisation, all 151 primary care trusts - which provided services such as hospitals, dentists and opticians - and the 10 regional strategic health authorities were abolished.During the reorganisation, all 151 primary care trusts - which provided services such as hospitals, dentists and opticians - and the 10 regional strategic health authorities were abolished.
New bodies called clinical commissioning groups were set up locally.New bodies called clinical commissioning groups were set up locally.
The report says: "A set of policies designed to streamline and simplify the organisation of the NHS ended up having the opposite effect."The report says: "A set of policies designed to streamline and simplify the organisation of the NHS ended up having the opposite effect."
It adds that the system is "bewildering in its complexity" and has left a "strategic vacuum" in some areas.It adds that the system is "bewildering in its complexity" and has left a "strategic vacuum" in some areas.
The King's Fund says that in the past two years, the focus has rightly shifted to improving patient safety and quality of care as well as treating more people at home rather than in hospital.The King's Fund says that in the past two years, the focus has rightly shifted to improving patient safety and quality of care as well as treating more people at home rather than in hospital.
In a warning ahead of the election campaign the report said: "If there is one clear message from the experience of the past five years, it is that politicians of all parties should be wary of ever again embarking on top-down restructuring of the NHS."In a warning ahead of the election campaign the report said: "If there is one clear message from the experience of the past five years, it is that politicians of all parties should be wary of ever again embarking on top-down restructuring of the NHS."
There was also criticism of Labour, who, the King's Fund says, is "crying wolf" with "ill-founded" claims about the NHS being privatised.There was also criticism of Labour, who, the King's Fund says, is "crying wolf" with "ill-founded" claims about the NHS being privatised.
A spokesman for Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said: "We welcome the King's Fund's recognition that the government's focus on patient safety and integrated care is right for the NHS's future.A spokesman for Health Secretary Jeremy Hunt said: "We welcome the King's Fund's recognition that the government's focus on patient safety and integrated care is right for the NHS's future.
"This independent assessment also puts paid to Ed Miliband's myth that the reforms were about privatisation, and highlights why both the public and the health sector should be wary of Labour's plans for upheaval and reorganisation.""This independent assessment also puts paid to Ed Miliband's myth that the reforms were about privatisation, and highlights why both the public and the health sector should be wary of Labour's plans for upheaval and reorganisation."
Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham said the report was "independent authoritative evidence" that the concerns Labour raised when the changes were introduced had been valid.Shadow health secretary Andy Burnham said the report was "independent authoritative evidence" that the concerns Labour raised when the changes were introduced had been valid.
'Chaos''Chaos'
But he said they had "ploughed on" and "plunged the NHS into the chaos we see today".But he said they had "ploughed on" and "plunged the NHS into the chaos we see today".
Dr Mark Porter, head of the British Medical Association (BMA) said the changes were "opposed by patients, the public and NHS staff, but politicians pushed through the changes regardless".Dr Mark Porter, head of the British Medical Association (BMA) said the changes were "opposed by patients, the public and NHS staff, but politicians pushed through the changes regardless".
He added: "This report highlights the damage that has been done to the health service and the major shortcomings of the Act, which distracted attention from rising pressure on services and cost billions to introduce.He added: "This report highlights the damage that has been done to the health service and the major shortcomings of the Act, which distracted attention from rising pressure on services and cost billions to introduce.
"The damage done to the NHS has been profound and intense, but what is needed now is an honest and frank debate over how we can put right what has gone wrong without the need for another unnecessary and costly top-down reorganisation.""The damage done to the NHS has been profound and intense, but what is needed now is an honest and frank debate over how we can put right what has gone wrong without the need for another unnecessary and costly top-down reorganisation."
But Mr Lansley said: "The report is silent on the question of whether patient care has been improved, on which the evidence is clear.But Mr Lansley said: "The report is silent on the question of whether patient care has been improved, on which the evidence is clear.
"The NHS is now judged to be the best health service in the world. The number of administrators has fallen, doctors and nurses have risen, productivity has gone up, and waste has been cut by over £5bn a year."The NHS is now judged to be the best health service in the world. The number of administrators has fallen, doctors and nurses have risen, productivity has gone up, and waste has been cut by over £5bn a year.
"Public sector reform has never been a popularity contest, but these reforms will last.""Public sector reform has never been a popularity contest, but these reforms will last."
Are you a GP or a patient in England? How do you view the changes made in 2013? You can share your experiences by emailing haveyoursay@bbc.co.uk. If you are happy to speak further to a BBC journalist, please include a contact telephone number.
Have your say