This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-budget-barack-obama-proposes-ambitious-tax-hikes-on-big-corporations-10018635.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
US budget: Barack Obama proposes ambitious tax hikes on big corporations US budget: Obama sets out to end the 'mindless austerity' and introduces tax hikes for wealthiest
(about 3 hours later)
President Barack Obama will today release a new budget blueprint for the United States, offering tax hikes for the rich and big corporations to fund new benefits for the middle class, as well an ambitious infrastructure spending programme that is certain to draw the ire of congressional Republicans. President Barack Obama has unveiled a sweeping budget blueprint with tax hikes for America’s wealthiest and big corporations to fund new breaks for the middle class as well a broad infrastructure investment effort that together will once more put him on a war footing with congressional Republicans.
The $4 trillion budget for a fiscal year that begins on 1 October puts meat on the bones of a combative State of the Union address delivered by the president last month, which emphasised helping middle class Americans by using changes in the tax code and other benefits to lift their prospects. The record $4 trillion budget for the fiscal year that begins on 1 October puts meat on the bone of the combative State of the Union delivered by the president last month that emphasised helping middle class Americans by changes in the tax code and the creation of other programmes and tax benefits to lift their prospects. It is a plan for the future that “reflects our values,” President Obama insisted. 
The proposed budget “invests in helping working families make their paychecks go further, preparing hardworking Americans to earn higher wages, and creating the infrastructure that allows businesses to thrive and create good, high-paying jobs”, said the White House in a statement this morning. While the White House recognises the chances of the inches-thick document winning blanket approval by a Congress under Republican control are slim to zero, it stands as opening bid in a debate on tackling the income gap in America that is likely to dominate next year’s presidential race.  It will present Republicans with some awkward choices as pressure rises on Washington to tackle income inequality.
While the White House is under no illusions about the chances of the inches-thick document winning approval now that Republicans control both chambers of Congress, there is some hope that it will force them into a serious debate about closing the income gap in America. It may also present Republicans with awkward choices because pressure on Washington to do something about that gap is real and growing. With his new budget, Mr Obama is also proposing ending strict federal spending ceilings, notably on defence, that were imposed as part of a compromise to end an acrimonious budget stand-off in 2011. Calling on Congress to “replace mindless austerity with sensible investment,” Mr Obama noted that the federal deficit had been cut by two thirds since he came into office.
Making his sixth State of the Union address, the US President, Barack Obama, will look straight past the routing of his party at last November’s midterm congressional elections and instead throw down the gauntlet to the Republican majority on raising taxes on the rich to help the middle class   The proposed boost in spending for the Pentagon will be welcomed by Republicans, some of whom also have some sympathy with Mr Obama’s request for a special infrastructure fund to mend America’s many crumbling bridges, roads and airports and further expand broadband access. His broader message of taking money from the rich and giving it to the middle classes remains anathema to the party, however.
“This country’s better off than it was four years ago, but what we also know is that wages and incomes for middle class families are just now ticking up,” Mr Obama said in an interview broadcast today on the NBC network. “They haven’t been keeping pace over the last 30 years compared to, you know, corporate profits and what’s happening to folks in the very top.” Many were already lining up to accuse Mr Obama of practising class warfare. He is trying to “exploit envy economics,” Paul Ryan, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, commented. “It may make for good politics. It doesn't make for good economic growth.”
His budget seeks a one-off 14 per cent tax on earnings parked overseas by US corporations to help fund an ambitious programme to mend America’s many crumbling bridges, roads and airports. Mr Obama is also seeking significantly to ease draconian ceilings that were imposed on a wide array of budget items, including defence spending, as part of a compromise to end an acrimonious budget stand-off in 2011. His budget seeks a one-off 14 per cent tax on earnings parked overseas by large US businesses. Thereafter, corporations like General Electric and Microsoft, which have thus far evaded taxes on earnings moved outside the US, would pay a continuing 19 per cent overseas earnings tax rate. He also wants to raise capital gains rates on top earners and close inheritance tax loopholes.
While Republicans would welcome a boost in money for the Pentagon, many were already were lining up to level the familiar accusation at Mr Obama that he is practicing class warfare. He is trying to “exploit envy economics”, said Paul Ryan, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. “It may make for good politics. It doesn't make for good economic growth.”  
The funds generated by the changes would be funneled variously towards the infrastructure bank, new child credits for the middle class, help with community college tuition for some students, a $1 billion fund to aid counties in Central America and a new boost in research spending by the US.  As well as a base $534 billion budget for the Pentagon, Mr Obama is also requesting $51 billion in war funds, reflecting concerns about the threat from the Islamic State and ongoing trouble in Ukraine.
More than just numbers, the draft is a statement of Mr Obama’s priorities for his last two years and could serve as a basis for the party’s 2016 nominee widely expected to be Hillary Clinton.
Taken as a whole, the draft “affords him an opportunity to contrast his vision of helping the middle class with the Republican Congress’ approach of exacerbating inequality, ignoring the middle class and making the burdens of those who want to enter it even greater,” said Neera Tanden, president of the Center for American Progress, a liberal think tank in Washington.