This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30572446

The article has changed 11 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 6 Version 7
Child abuse inquiry: Survivors want new panel and extra powers Child abuse inquiry: Survivors want new panel and extra powers
(about 1 hour later)
Dozens of child abuse survivors have urged the government to scrap an inquiry into historical abuse and replace it with a more powerful body.Dozens of child abuse survivors have urged the government to scrap an inquiry into historical abuse and replace it with a more powerful body.
The call comes after a leaked letter from Theresa May told inquiry members their panel might be disbanded. The call comes after Home Secretary Theresa May told inquiry members their panel might be disbanded.
Peter Saunders, from National Association for People Abused in Childhood, said the move would be supported by the majority of survivors. Peter Saunders, from the National Association for People Abused in Childhood, said the move would be supported by the majority of survivors.
Labour's Simon Danczuk said the inquiry so far had been an "utter mess". Labour MP Simon Danczuk called the handling of the probe an "utter mess".
Mr Danczuk, who exposed child sex abuse allegations against former Liberal MP Cyril Smith, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that survivors would be "dismayed" by the progress of the inquiry - which was set up in July and has started work, but has no chairman. Mr Danczuk, who exposed child sex abuse allegations against former Liberal MP Cyril Smith, told Radio 4's Today programme that survivors would be "dismayed" by the progress of the inquiry - which was set up in July and has started work, but has no-one to chair it.
'Very good people''Very good people'
He later told BBC Radio 5 live: "It is verging on a disgrace in terms of how government, how Theresa May, and how Home Office officials have organised or failed to organise this particular enquiry."He later told BBC Radio 5 live: "It is verging on a disgrace in terms of how government, how Theresa May, and how Home Office officials have organised or failed to organise this particular enquiry."
Mr Saunders said he had not met any survivors who had any confidence in the process and the panel, "as it is currently constituted". Mr Saunders said he had not met any survivors who currently had any confidence in the process and panel.
"There are some very good people on that panel as it stands at the moment, but there are one or two characters who sadly have an association with the past that would make them inappropriate," he said."There are some very good people on that panel as it stands at the moment, but there are one or two characters who sadly have an association with the past that would make them inappropriate," he said.
He added that if the panel was disbanded it would not "take us back to square one", and argued that getting the inquiry set up correctly would win the support of survivors. It would not "take us back to square one" if the panel was disbanded, he said.
But former children's minister and Tory MP Tim Loughton told BBC Radio 4's Today programme that all the survivors he had met wanted to get the inquiry going, and he did not accept that disbanding the panel was the will of the majority. Getting the inquiry set up correctly would win the support of survivors, he added.
In the letter to Home Secretary Theresa May from survivors, survivors' groups and associated professionals, they call for a new inquiry with the power to "compel witnesses to give evidence under oath". But former children's minister and Tory MP Tim Loughton said all survivors he had met wanted to get the inquiry going.
In the letter to Home Secretary Theresa May, survivors, survivors' groups and associated professionals call for a new inquiry with the power to "compel witnesses to give evidence under oath".
It is "essential" the inquiry has these legal powers to "prevent evidence being withheld or tampered with", they say.It is "essential" the inquiry has these legal powers to "prevent evidence being withheld or tampered with", they say.
The letter also says they would welcome a "dedicated police team to take evidence alongside the inquiry and investigate and prosecute offenders". The letter also says they would welcome a "dedicated police team" to investigate and prosecute offenders alongside the inquiry.
They say this would "increase confidence", adding it is "essential" those conducting the inquiry "are free from strong links to prominent establishment figures or any other potential conflict of interest". It is also "essential" that those conducting the inquiry "are free from strong links to prominent establishment figures or any other potential conflict of interest", they add.
The letter also calls for the terms of reference of the inquiry to be extended to include allegations of historical abuse dating back as far as 1945, rather than 1970 as is presently the case. The letter calls for the terms of reference to be extended to include allegations of historical abuse dating back as far as 1945, rather than 1970 as is presently the case.
One of the people who signed the letter was abuse survivor and campaigner Ian McFayden. He said the government only had "one chance" to get an inquiry like this right, and it needed to have teeth. Abuse survivor and campaigner Ian McFayden, who signed the letter, said the government had "one chance" to get an inquiry like this right, and it needed to have teeth.
Lib Dem MP Tessa Munt, who has revealed that she suffered from child abuse herself, also agreed the inquiry needed greater powers, and people should be compelled to give evidence under oath. Lib Dem MP Tessa Munt, who has revealed she suffered from child abuse, also agreed the inquiry needed greater powers, with people compelled to give evidence under oath.
Mrs May's first two choices to be the inquiry's chairperson both stood down amid claims they had close links with establishment figures.
The inquiry, sparked by claims of paedophiles operating in Westminster in the 1980s, will investigate whether "public bodies and other non-state institutions have taken seriously their duty of care to protect children from sexual abuse in England and Wales".The inquiry, sparked by claims of paedophiles operating in Westminster in the 1980s, will investigate whether "public bodies and other non-state institutions have taken seriously their duty of care to protect children from sexual abuse in England and Wales".
In her letter to current panel members, seen by the BBC, Mrs May said she was considering three options to give the inquiry more powers - and only one did not require the panel to be disbanded. In her letter to current panel members, which has been seen by the BBC, Mrs May said she was considering three options to give the inquiry more powers. One did not require the panel to be disbanded.
She acknowledged the situation had "not been easy" for panel members but said the "confidence of survivors is paramount". An inquiry source told the BBC panel members had been told they could apply for positions on the new panel. She acknowledged that the situation had "not been easy" for panel members but said the "confidence of survivors is paramount". An inquiry source told the BBC panel members had been told they could apply for positions on any new panel.
A leaked reply to Mrs May from panel member Sharon Evans, who runs a children's charity and suffered abuse herself, says halting the inquiry now "would send a very negative message to so many people we have already met and who we have promised they can have confidence in us to do the right thing". A leaked reply to Mrs May from panel member Sharon Evans, who runs a children's charity and suffered abuse, says halting the inquiry now "would send a very negative message to so many people we have already met".
Its first chair, Baroness Butler-Sloss, resigned a week after the inquiry was set up. She faced calls to quit because her late brother, Sir Michael Havers, was attorney general in the 1980s. The first two choices for inquiry chairman stood down.
Her replacement, Lord Mayor of London Fiona Woolf, was appointed in September - but on 31 October she stood down amid questions over her links to former Home Secretary Lord Brittan. Baroness Butler-Sloss, resigned a week after the inquiry was set up. She faced calls to quit because her late brother, Sir Michael Havers, was attorney general in the 1980s.
Her replacement, Lord Mayor of London Fiona Woolf, was appointed in September. But on 31 October she stood down amid questions over her links to former Home Secretary Lord Brittan.
The current panel members include:The current panel members include: