This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2014/dec/19/ferguson-prosecutor-witnesses-darren-wilson-michael-brown

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Ferguson prosecutor says witnesses in Darren Wilson case lied under oath Ferguson prosecutor says witnesses in Darren Wilson case lied under oath
(35 minutes later)
Some witnesses before the grand jury that investigated the shooting death of 18-year-old Michael Brown lied under oath, according to St Louis county prosecutor Bob McCulloch. Some witnesses who appeared before the grand jury investigating the death of 18-year-old Michael Brown were “clearly not telling the truth,’ according to the St Louis county prosecutor, Robert McCulloch.
McCulloch, who convened the grand jury in August, was interviewed by KTRS Radio in St. Louis, his first interview since he announced on 24 November that the grand jury would not indict Ferguson officer Darren Wilson in the shooting of Brown, who was unarmed. In his first public interview since announcing the grand jury’s decision not to indict officer Darren Wilson, McCulloch told local radio station KTRS that he decided to put witnesses forward to testify regardless of their credibility.
“Clearly some were not telling the truth,” McCulloch said. “Early on I decided that anyone who claimed to have witnessed anything would be presented to the grand jury,” he said.
He made reference to one woman who claimed to have seen the shooting. McCulloch said she “clearly wasn’t present”, and that she “recounted a story right out of the newspaper” that backed up Wilson’s version of events. McCulloch did not return messages left with his office by the Associated Press on Friday. “I knew somebody would be critical of whatever I did,” he said. “I thought it was important to present anybody and everybody, and some that were, yes, clearly not telling the truth, no question about it.”
The shooting by a white police officer on 9 August spurred unrest in St. Louis, and the subsequent decision not to indict triggered protests nationwide and debates about race relations and police departments that patrol minority neighborhoods. The admission came just days after The Smoking Gun, an investigative site which publishes government, police and other documents, claimed to have identified a key grand jury witnesses, and raised serious questions about the credibility of her testimony.
The demonstrations and discussions were resumed after a New York grand jury decided this month not to indict a white police officer for his role in the chokehold death of a black man, Eric Garner. “Witness 40,” The Smoking Gun said, was Sandra McElroy, a 45-year-old St Louis resident who has a past criminal record and a history of using racial epithets in online posts.
In the radio interview, McCulloch also defended the decision to make the announcement at night, saying it was best for schools and allowed business owners time to decide whether to open the next day. The site said it found her by using certain details in the unredacted portion of the grand jury transcript – Witness 40’s age, her home town, the fact that she was adopted, her two arrests for cheque fraud in 2007 – and checked them against public records and social media accounts.
Congresswoman Karla May is pushing for a state investigation of McCulloch, and whether he “manipulated” the grand jury into the decision. In an update to its story, The Smoking Gun said on Tuesday that McElroy had confirmed her identity as “Witness 40”, and was speaking to a lawyer.
A joint House and Senate committee is already investigating why Gov. Jay Nixon did not use National Guard troops in Ferguson on 24 November. May, a St. Louis Democrat, sent a letter Thursday to committee chairman Sen. Kurt Schaefer, urging that the investigation expand to look at whether McCulloch committed prosecutorial misconduct. The Smoking Gun also reported that McElroy came forward as a witness in another high-profile criminal case in 2007 - with a story that authorities later dismissed as “a complete fabrication.”
She said in an interview that McCulloch should have removed himself from the case at the outset. In her grand jury testimony, “Witness 40” described in detail how Michael Brown bent down “in a football position” and charged at officer Darren Wilson – an account often quoted in discussion of the case by right-wing commentators such as Fox News’s Sean Hannity.
Critics had called for McCulloch to either step aside or for Nixon to appoint a special prosecutor, citing concerns about whether McCulloch could fairly oversee the case. McCulloch’s father was a police officer killed in the line of duty by a black assailant in the 1960s. It was already noted in her testimony to the grand jury that “Witness 40” was not taking medication for bipolar disorder, and that she had memory problems after being injured in a 2001 car crash. The witness waited until after Wilson’s account of events was in the public domain, four weeks after the shooting, before coming to police with a story which directly corroborated his version of events.
Ferguson Mayor James Knowles III and others expressed anger that of the hundreds of National Guard troops dispatched to the St. Louis region on 24 November, none were in Ferguson as the announcement was made. The Smoking Gun also highlighted how “Witness 40” gave the grand jury several different explanations for her presence in Ferguson on the day Brown was killed – and that she admitted that her first version of the story was untrue.
No timetable has been set for the legislative committee’s investigation, and it wasn’t clear if the committee would consider investigating McCulloch. A message left with Schaefer was not immediately returned. McCulloch, in his interview, appeared to corroborate The Smoking Gun’s investigation of McElroy. “Some of the media is doing exactly what I said they would do,” he said. “They pull out one witness and just latch on to that.”
“This is a lady who clearly wasn’t present when this occurred, and she recounted this statement that was right out of the newspaper about Wilson’s actions, right down the line,” said McCulloch, “even though I’m sure she was nowhere near the place.”
“The thing that changed in her story several times was the reason she had to be in Canfield that day,” he continued.
The Smoking Gun alleged that McElroy’s testimony to the grand jury was also fabricated. “I believe there is a clear preponderance of evidence,” William Bastone, the editor of The Smoking Gun, told the Guardian. “We’d never have posted a story accusing her of perjury – and identifying her – if we weren’t 100% certain.”
This, too, appeared to be corroborated by McCulloch. “There are people who came in and, yes, absolutely lied under oath. Some lied to the FBI – even though they aren’t under oath, that’s another potential federal offence.” He added that he had allowed them to testify anyway because he had felt “it was much more important to present the entire picture.”
He said his department was not planning to pursue perjury charges.
The Smoking Gun reported that McElroy often posted online about the case after Michael Brown’s shooting, but before “Witness 40” went to the police with her story. In one reply to a post on Facebook about the case, McElroy said, “The report and autopsy are in so YES they were false.”
McElroy also reportedly regularly posted racial slurs about Brown in particular, and black people in general.
The Smoking Gun also reported that McElroy had previously been accused of lying about her involvement with a high-profile kidnapping casein St Louis. In that case, McElroy gave statements to the police in which she said that she had seen the kidnapper Michael Devlin with his victim Shawn Hornbeck months after his disappearance, and that she had known Devlin for 20 years. Police later declared those statements to be “a complete fabrication”.
Emails sent to several addresses believed to be connected to McElroy this week were not returned. On Wednesday, McElroy told the St Louis Post-Dispatch that she stood by her original story, and that she regretted ever coming forward. The St Louis County prosecutor Robert McCullough was not available for comment on Friday.