This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/english-votes-for-english-laws-tories-aim-to-rush-devolution-plans-through-parliament-9929436.html

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
English votes for English laws: Tories aim to rush devolution plans through Parliament English votes for English laws: Tories aim to rush devolution plans through Parliament
(about 4 hours later)
Conservative leaders were urged by their MPs to bring in “English votes for English laws” speedily to avert a voter backlash against the devolution of extra powers to Scotland. David Cameron and other top Conservatives have been urged by their MPs to bring in “English votes for English laws” speedily to avert a voter backlash against the devolution of extra powers to Scotland, after the announcement of proposals for major constitutional reform.
William Hague, the Commons Leader, has detailed three options being considered by the party to restrict the right of Scottish MPs to vote on legislation affecting only England. William Hague, the Commons Leader, yesterday detailed three options being considered by the party to restrict the right of Scottish MPs to vote on legislation affecting only England.
David Cameron put the issue of English votes for English laws on to the political agenda immediately after Scotland voted against independence, having been promised more authority over tax, spending and welfare. But he immediately faced pressure from senior backbenchers to implement rapid change to give English MPs full authority over English matters.
His move provoked a bitter row with Labour, which accused the Tories of attempting to rush through constitutional change for political advantage. David Cameron put the issue of “English votes for English laws” onto the political agenda immediately after Scotland voted against independence and was promised more authority over tax, spending and welfare.
The Conservatives are not being pinned down on their favoured version of English laws, and will announce their decision ahead of next year’s general election. His move provoked a bitter row with Labour, which accused the Tories of attempting to rush through constitutional change for political advantage. The Conservative leadership are refusing to commit to one version of the English laws and will announce their decision ahead of next year’s general election.
In the Commons Mr Hague faced pressure from senior backbenchers to implement rapid change to give English MPs full authority over English matters. But the former Cabinet minister John Redwood said yesterday that change was long overdue, following the Scottish Parliament’s establishment in 1999. “England expects English votes for English issues,” he said. “We expect simplicity and justice now: no ifs, no buts, no committee limitations, no tricks. Give us what we want.”
The former Cabinet minister John Redwood said the change was long overdue following the Scottish Parliament’s establishment in 1999. Sir George Young, a former Tory chief whip, said: “With the imminent transfer of more powers to the Scottish Parliament, is it not now urgent to address this issue in this Parliament?”
He said: “England expects English votes for English issues. We expect simplicity and justice now: no ifs, no buts, no committee limitations, no tricks. Give us what we want. We have waited 15 years for this.” Former Welsh secretary John Redwood (Getty Images) The Bury MP David Nuttall ridiculed the claim the issue was being rushed and added: “My constituents want to see action on this matter now.”
Former Welsh secretary John Redwood (Getty Images) Sir George Young, a former Tory chief whip, said: “With the imminent transfer of more powers to the Scottish Parliament, is it not now urgent to address this issue in the remainder of this Parliament?” Mr Hague reassured MPs that there would be no delay and said he was committed to reaching a decision on the preferred model of devolution in the new year.
The Bury MP David Nuttall ridiculed the claim that the issue was being rushed and added: “My constituents want to see action on this matter now." “Devolution to other parts of the United Kingdom has created the situation in which MPs representing constituencies outside England may vote on legislation which does not affect their constituents, while English MPs are not able to influence these policies in other nations where they are devolved,” he said.
Mr Hague reassured MPs that there would be no delay and said he was committed to reaching a decision on the preferred model of devolution in the New Year. The former Foreign Secretary said his party’s reform was inspired by a “fundamental issue of fairness for all the people of the United Kingdom”.
“Devolution to other parts of the United Kingdom has created a situation in which MPs representing constituencies outside England may vote on legislation which does not affect their constituents while English MPs are not able to influence these policies in other nations where they are devolved,” he said. The Tories’ most radical option would enable English – and Welsh – MPs to block any legislation which affected their country alone, while the other two options would give them a partial veto.
He said his party’s reform was inspired by a “fundamental issue of fairness for all the people of the United Kingdom”. Shadow justice secretary Sadiq Khan (Getty) The Government also published a separate proposal drawn up by the Liberal Democrats.
The Tories’ most radical option would enable English – and Welsh – MPs to block any legislation which affects their country alone, while the other two options would give them a partial veto. The Government also published a separate proposal drawn up by the Liberal Democrats.
Labour refused to participate in cross-party talks on reform and is backing the establishment of a constitutional convention to draw up plans for change.Labour refused to participate in cross-party talks on reform and is backing the establishment of a constitutional convention to draw up plans for change.
Shadow justice secretary Sadiq Khan (Getty) Sadiq Khan, the shadow Justice Secretary, called for devolution to cities and regions as well as the UK’s nation in conjunction with a reformed House of Lords. Sadiq Khan, the shadow Justice Secretary, called for devolution to cities and regions as well as the UK’s nations in conjunction with a reformed House of Lords.
But he warned: “What we must not do, only months after the Scottish people voted to keep our kingdom united, is allow the division of our country by the back door. Nothing we do should jeopardise the future of the Union.” But he warned: “What we must not do, only months after the Scottish people voted to keep our kingdom united, is allow the division of our country by the back door.”
Katie Ghose, the chief of the Electoral Reform Society, also called for a constitutional convention, arguing that the “shopping list of solutions” produced by Mr Hague proved there was no agreement within the coalition on the issue. Katie Ghose, the chief of the Electoral Reform Society, also called for a constitutional convention, arguing the “shopping list of solutions” proved there was no agreement within the coalition on the issue.
“There is a better way to approach this problem, one which doesn't involve politicians squabbling behind closed doors as they drift further and further away from the public,” she said. The Tory options and the Lib Dem alternative
1 (CON): Exclude non-English MPs altogether
The most radical option. It would exclude non-English MPs from voting on swathes of legislation which did not affect their countries.
Likelihood: 3/5
2 (CON):  Power over detail
This is a watered-down version of the first option, but still is a virtual veto for English (or English and Welsh) MPs. Only they would vote at committee and report stages. All MPs could vote at the third reading, where Bills cannot be amended.
Likelihood: 4/5
3 (CON): Giving a veto
The committee stage of Bills affecting England would only be taken by an English Grand Committee of MPs in proportion to their parties’ representation. Welsh MPs would participate where relevant. MPs from across UK could sit at other stages of Bills.
Likelihood: 2/5
4 (LIB DEM): Giving a veto (with PR)
As 3, but with the proviso that English MPs (and Welsh MPs where appropriate) voting at committee stage should be selected in proportion to votes cast.
Likelihood: 1/5