This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/business/nils-pratley-on-finance/2014/dec/16/bank-stress-tests-co-op-rbs-lloyds

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Stress tests: bailed-out banks scrape a pass but global risks loom large Stress tests: bailed-out banks scrape a pass but global risks loom large
(about 7 hours later)
It’s a triumph. The big UK lenders – apart from the Co-op Bank, obviously – can withstand a 35% fall in house prices in the UK, a deep recession and a surge in unemployment. And they can do so without cutting lending, according to the Bank of England’s stress tests. Reassured?It’s a triumph. The big UK lenders – apart from the Co-op Bank, obviously – can withstand a 35% fall in house prices in the UK, a deep recession and a surge in unemployment. And they can do so without cutting lending, according to the Bank of England’s stress tests. Reassured?
Up to a point, we should be. Lloyds and Royal Bank of Scotland only just squeaked a pass, but both can make fair arguments that their capital positions have improved since the Bank flexed the numbers based on balance sheets at the end of 2013. Indeed, RBS today off-loaded a £1bn bundle of Irish property loans as part of its capital-enhancing efforts.Up to a point, we should be. Lloyds and Royal Bank of Scotland only just squeaked a pass, but both can make fair arguments that their capital positions have improved since the Bank flexed the numbers based on balance sheets at the end of 2013. Indeed, RBS today off-loaded a £1bn bundle of Irish property loans as part of its capital-enhancing efforts.
Lloyds’ dreams of paying a token dividend for 2014 are just about intact. Chief executive António Horta-Osório has made something of a fetish of this ambition given that the last Lloyds dividend came in 2008. A payment of 0.5p per share would cost about £300m. If the Bank’s Prudential Regulation Authority is feeling generous next February, it might just allow such tokenism. The level of real dividends for 2015 and thereafter remains a mystery however.Lloyds’ dreams of paying a token dividend for 2014 are just about intact. Chief executive António Horta-Osório has made something of a fetish of this ambition given that the last Lloyds dividend came in 2008. A payment of 0.5p per share would cost about £300m. If the Bank’s Prudential Regulation Authority is feeling generous next February, it might just allow such tokenism. The level of real dividends for 2015 and thereafter remains a mystery however.
As for the Co-op Bank, the best that can be said is that it is less of a basket-case than it was. In a perfect world, the Co-op would have been told to raise even more capital a year ago, and so avoid a situation where all its capital would be exhausted under stress. Since a fatter fund-raising was impossible, the bank must shed more mortgage assets and has been told to hurry up about it – management had to submit a revised plan to the PRA.As for the Co-op Bank, the best that can be said is that it is less of a basket-case than it was. In a perfect world, the Co-op would have been told to raise even more capital a year ago, and so avoid a situation where all its capital would be exhausted under stress. Since a fatter fund-raising was impossible, the bank must shed more mortgage assets and has been told to hurry up about it – management had to submit a revised plan to the PRA.
This seems a reasonable pragmatic fudge by the regulators. No rival wants to buy the Co-op Bank and, at this point, the institution is probably not big enough to shake the UK financial system. So the plan is to force the Co-op into safer waters – or, as governor Mark Carney put it, oblige it to get a balance sheet that provides “a resilience commensurate with a bank of its future size and business model”.This seems a reasonable pragmatic fudge by the regulators. No rival wants to buy the Co-op Bank and, at this point, the institution is probably not big enough to shake the UK financial system. So the plan is to force the Co-op into safer waters – or, as governor Mark Carney put it, oblige it to get a balance sheet that provides “a resilience commensurate with a bank of its future size and business model”.
Yet the underlying worry about these stress tests is that they are one-dimensional. It is perfectly fair, of course, to look first at UK house prices, UK commercial property loans and the UK economy as a source of potential stress. That is where the big direct exposures lie for most UK banks.Yet the underlying worry about these stress tests is that they are one-dimensional. It is perfectly fair, of course, to look first at UK house prices, UK commercial property loans and the UK economy as a source of potential stress. That is where the big direct exposures lie for most UK banks.
But the next dangers – at least as the world looks today – probably lie overseas. “Risks stemming from non-EU jurisdictions were explored less comprehensively,” admits the Bank, adding that “risks from global credit exposures are expected to be an area of greater focus in the 2015 stress test”. In other words, banks with big Asian exposures – think Standard Chartered and HSBC – were treated relatively lightly this time.But the next dangers – at least as the world looks today – probably lie overseas. “Risks stemming from non-EU jurisdictions were explored less comprehensively,” admits the Bank, adding that “risks from global credit exposures are expected to be an area of greater focus in the 2015 stress test”. In other words, banks with big Asian exposures – think Standard Chartered and HSBC – were treated relatively lightly this time.
But the economic downturn in Asia and the developing crisis in Russia are now the main global risks for banks. Carney seemed mildly relaxed about the Russian threat – UK banks’ direct exposure is small and Russia is less linked to the global financial system than it was at the time of the 1998 debt default. Fair enough, but what that answer does not reveal is how the risks would play out if the Russian economic crisis becomes a political crisis. Unpredictably is the only honest response to that question.But the economic downturn in Asia and the developing crisis in Russia are now the main global risks for banks. Carney seemed mildly relaxed about the Russian threat – UK banks’ direct exposure is small and Russia is less linked to the global financial system than it was at the time of the 1998 debt default. Fair enough, but what that answer does not reveal is how the risks would play out if the Russian economic crisis becomes a political crisis. Unpredictably is the only honest response to that question.
Sub-1% inflation in its way
Carney said again that it was “more likely than not” that he would have to write a letter to the chancellor to explain why inflation, on the CPI measure, had fallen below 1%. The equivocation is polite but unnecessary. It’s going to happen. CPI was 1% exactly in November, we learned, and fuel prices have fallen since then. Even if it doesn’t quite happen next month, a sub-1% reading is a near-certainty soon.
How low could CPI go in coming months? Neil Williams at Hermes Investment Management points out that the UK has overall price deflation in goods already for the first time since 2007; it’s only stickier services prices that are holding up CPI. Williams predicts a trough will be reached on CPI next February at 0.3%. For 2015 as a whole, he suggests CPI will average just 0.9%. Over at Barclays, they are expecting 1.3% for 2015 and 1.6% for 2016.
The Bank, as Carney also said, can look through the effect of lower oil prices on the inflation figures. Of course it can – and should. It’s just that it’s very hard to imagine the Bank’s monetary policy committee sanctioning a rate rise when the rate of inflation is still hovering around the 1% mark.
If that’s correct, and if cheaper oil will be with us for at least a year, the first rate rise looks to be an autumn 2015 event.
MySale needs support
If the slump in MySale’s share price on Monday was a mild setback for celebrity shareholders Sir Philip Green and Sports Direct’s Mike Ashley, the losses are becoming embarrassing now. The Australian online retailer plunged another 19% on Tuesday to 66p, versus June’s flotation price of 226p. The market capitalisation is thus about £100m – that’s for a company with £33m of cash in the bank.
In a different world, Green, with a 22% stake, would get himself installed on the board to tell founder Jamie Jackson how the retailing game works. That’s not going to happen, one assumes because Green has no desire to re-enter the public arena. But he could do MySale, and himself, a favour by finding a well-connected friend willing to serve in the boardroom and restore some confidence in the company.