This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/first-bus-wins-appeal-meaning-drivers-wont-be-legally-required-to-ask-parents-to-move-buggies-from-bays-for-wheelchair-users-9910755.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
First Bus wins appeal meaning drivers won't be legally required to ask parents to move buggies from bays for wheelchair users First Bus wins appeal meaning drivers won't be legally required to ask parents to move buggies from bays for wheelchair users
(about 4 hours later)
Bus companies will not be legally required to compel parents to move their children’s buggies to make way for wheelchair users, following a judgement at the Court of Appeal today.Bus companies will not be legally required to compel parents to move their children’s buggies to make way for wheelchair users, following a judgement at the Court of Appeal today.
The “proper remedy” for wheelchair users to get improvements in such cases is to ask Parliament, three judges ruled.The “proper remedy” for wheelchair users to get improvements in such cases is to ask Parliament, three judges ruled.
First Bus Group had asked the judges to give a ruling following a woman's refusal to move a pushchair with a sleeping baby from a bay on a bus to Leeds in 2012, in order to allow wheelchair user Doug Paulley to board.First Bus Group had asked the judges to give a ruling following a woman's refusal to move a pushchair with a sleeping baby from a bay on a bus to Leeds in 2012, in order to allow wheelchair user Doug Paulley to board.
The judges heard that the bus operator has a policy of “requesting but not requiring” non-disabled travellers to vacate the space if it is needed by a wheelchair user.The judges heard that the bus operator has a policy of “requesting but not requiring” non-disabled travellers to vacate the space if it is needed by a wheelchair user.
A judge at Leeds County Court had previously ruled that the policy was discriminatory and in breach of a duty under the Equality Act 2010 to make reasonable adjustments for disabled people.A judge at Leeds County Court had previously ruled that the policy was discriminatory and in breach of a duty under the Equality Act 2010 to make reasonable adjustments for disabled people.
Mr Paulley, from Wetherby, West Yorkshire, won £5,500 in damages against First Group, after Recorder Paul Isaacs declared the company should have taken measures to ensure he was not at a disadvantage when he tried to get on the bus.Mr Paulley, from Wetherby, West Yorkshire, won £5,500 in damages against First Group, after Recorder Paul Isaacs declared the company should have taken measures to ensure he was not at a disadvantage when he tried to get on the bus.
Martin Chamberlain QC, for First Group, told the appeal court that there was a long-running problem on public transport that had produced conflicting court decisions and bus operators were now seeking legal clarity.Martin Chamberlain QC, for First Group, told the appeal court that there was a long-running problem on public transport that had produced conflicting court decisions and bus operators were now seeking legal clarity.
On Twitter, there were mixed responses to the ruling. Many Twitter users expressed their disappointment at the outcome:On Twitter, there were mixed responses to the ruling. Many Twitter users expressed their disappointment at the outcome:
The ruling on disabled spaces on buses/trains seems to equate the faff of a pram with the hard fact of a wheelchair.The ruling on disabled spaces on buses/trains seems to equate the faff of a pram with the hard fact of a wheelchair.
Can't believe the attitude of the mother who wouldn't move her buggy to allow wheelchair user to get on bus. Another example of pushy mums?Can't believe the attitude of the mother who wouldn't move her buggy to allow wheelchair user to get on bus. Another example of pushy mums?
Can all members of parliament and judges get in a wheelchair and try to get on a train or bus and see for themselves just how difficult...Can all members of parliament and judges get in a wheelchair and try to get on a train or bus and see for themselves just how difficult...
However, others Twitter users were more sympathetic towards the ruling:However, others Twitter users were more sympathetic towards the ruling:
I don't think anyone should be forced to move on a bus. So glad I have a car #pushchair #wheelchairI don't think anyone should be forced to move on a bus. So glad I have a car #pushchair #wheelchair
Isn't the most tragic thing about the First Bus ruling that both wheelchair-users and buggy-users are treated appallingly by bus companies?Isn't the most tragic thing about the First Bus ruling that both wheelchair-users and buggy-users are treated appallingly by bus companies?
Mr Paulley's defence of the Isaacs decision is being funded by the Equality and Human Rights Commission. His lawyers have now applied to appeal to the Supreme Court.Mr Paulley's defence of the Isaacs decision is being funded by the Equality and Human Rights Commission. His lawyers have now applied to appeal to the Supreme Court.
"I have cerebral palsy and have always used a wheelchair. It was impossible to use the buses in London until I was 16 because there were no wheelchair spaces. It felt like a breakthrough when they were introduced.
"But there have been many occasions when I haven’t been able to get on a bus because of buggies taking up the space. It is frustrating.
"People with buggies don’t tend to move for you and I don’t like to ask them to because it makes me feel vulnerable; I don’t know how they’ll react. Sometimes they get angry and say it is their right to stay there, which is now true thanks to this ruling.
"Disabled people tried for years to get space on the bus. It feels very unfair."