This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-australia-30324599

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Indonesian shell has 'earliest human engraving' Indonesian shell has 'earliest human engraving'
(4 months later)
Zig-zag patterns found on a fossilised shell in Indonesia may be the earliest engraving by a human ancestor, a study has claimed.Zig-zag patterns found on a fossilised shell in Indonesia may be the earliest engraving by a human ancestor, a study has claimed.
The engraving is at least 430,000 years old, meaning it was done by the long-extinct Homo erectus, said the study.The engraving is at least 430,000 years old, meaning it was done by the long-extinct Homo erectus, said the study.
The oldest man-made markings previously found were about 130,000 years old.The oldest man-made markings previously found were about 130,000 years old.
If confirmed, experts say the findings published in the journal Nature may force a rethink of how human culture developed.If confirmed, experts say the findings published in the journal Nature may force a rethink of how human culture developed.
One of the report's authors, Stephen Munro, told the BBC it could "rewrite human history".One of the report's authors, Stephen Munro, told the BBC it could "rewrite human history".
"This is the first time we have found evidence for Homo erectus behaving this way," said the researcher, from Australian National University."This is the first time we have found evidence for Homo erectus behaving this way," said the researcher, from Australian National University.
'No other explanation'
Hundreds of fossilised freshwater mussel shells were excavated and collected in Java by Dutch scientist Eugene Dubois in the 1890s, then stored in boxes for years in the Dutch city of Leiden.Hundreds of fossilised freshwater mussel shells were excavated and collected in Java by Dutch scientist Eugene Dubois in the 1890s, then stored in boxes for years in the Dutch city of Leiden.
In May 2007, Mr Munro took photos of them as part of his research for his PhD.In May 2007, Mr Munro took photos of them as part of his research for his PhD.
The engravings stood out very clearly on the digital photos when they had not been visible to the naked eye.The engravings stood out very clearly on the digital photos when they had not been visible to the naked eye.
"Immediately when I saw the markings there I thought, those are human engravings, there's no other explanation," he said."Immediately when I saw the markings there I thought, those are human engravings, there's no other explanation," he said.
A group of scientists then worked to date the shell and check whether the engravings were as old as the shell itself.A group of scientists then worked to date the shell and check whether the engravings were as old as the shell itself.
They found the engravings were indeed made before fossilisation, when the mussel was fresh between 430,000 and 540,000 years ago.They found the engravings were indeed made before fossilisation, when the mussel was fresh between 430,000 and 540,000 years ago.
Mr Munro said the discovery could confirm theories that Homo erectus had significant manual dexterity and greater cognitive abilities than previously thought.Mr Munro said the discovery could confirm theories that Homo erectus had significant manual dexterity and greater cognitive abilities than previously thought.
"We see this type of behaviour, whether it's art or symbolic expressions, we reserve that behaviour for ourselves. As something quite uniquely human," he said."We see this type of behaviour, whether it's art or symbolic expressions, we reserve that behaviour for ourselves. As something quite uniquely human," he said.
"With this finding, we might say there are definitely difference between us and Homo erectus. But they might be more like us than we previously thought.""With this finding, we might say there are definitely difference between us and Homo erectus. But they might be more like us than we previously thought."
It is not clear whether the pattern was a form of art, or served another purpose.It is not clear whether the pattern was a form of art, or served another purpose.
Other experts expressed scepticism about the research.Other experts expressed scepticism about the research.
John Shea, from Stony Brook University in New York, told NPR there was "nothing like it around for hundreds of thousands of years, and thousands and thousands of miles".John Shea, from Stony Brook University in New York, told NPR there was "nothing like it around for hundreds of thousands of years, and thousands and thousands of miles".
"If this is symbolic behaviour by Homo erectus, then it's basically the only evidence we've got for a species that lived for a million-and-a-half years on three continents," he said."If this is symbolic behaviour by Homo erectus, then it's basically the only evidence we've got for a species that lived for a million-and-a-half years on three continents," he said.