This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-29846002

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Extended sentences for three terrorists justified, judges rule Extended terror sentences justified, appeal court rules
(35 minutes later)
Three men who challenged their special extended sentences for terrorism offences have lost their appeal. Three men who challenged their extended sentences for preparing terrorism offences have lost their appeals.
The trio, including radical Muslim Richard Dart who appeared in a television documentary, were sentenced to additional monitoring in the community after their jail terms. The trio, including Richard Dart, a convert to radical Islam who has featured in TV documentaries, were sentenced to additional monitoring in the community after their jail terms.
They argued during the appeal that the punishment was unfair. They had argued during their appeal that the punishment was unfair.
But the Court of Appeal ruled the sentences were justified because of the dangers the men posed. But the Court of Appeal has ruled the sentences were justified because of the dangers the men posed.
The men had all admitted preparing for acts of terrorism.
Each was given an extended sentence - meaning a jail term plus additional monitoring on licence in the community - last April.
Wootton Bassett attack
Dart, from Weymouth, sought training in Pakistan and then discussed plans to attack Royal Wootton Bassett, the town that was the focal point for the repatriation of soldiers killed in Afghanistan, with others in the UK.
The other two men, Zahid Iqbal and Mohammed Sharfaraz Ahmed, from Luton, had prepared for a possible attack on the town's Territorial Army base.
The decision means a string of sentencing hearings for Syria-related terrorism offences, which had been on hold pending the outcome of this appeal, can now go ahead.
Dart received a six-year extended sentence, meaning he must serve at least two-thirds in jail before he can be considered for release on licence.
At the end of those six years, he will be subject to a further five years of monitoring under licence in the community.
He would be sent back to jail if he committed another offence during that time.
Iqbal and Ahmed received extended sentences of just over 16 years - comprising an 11-year jail sentence plus an extra five on licence.
Rejecting their appeals at the Royal Courts of Justice, Lord Justice Pitchford said the judges who sentenced them had followed the appropriate procedures to assess each man as posing ongoing dangers to society.
Dart came to prominence after his stepbrother made a BBC documentary in which he explored why Dart had turned to a radical interpretation of Islam.