This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/oct/30/re-written-letter-child-abuse-inquiry

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Re-written letter adds to questions over child abuse inquiry head Re-written letter adds to questions over child abuse inquiry head
(about 1 hour later)
The head of the government’s inquiry into historic child sexual abuse allegations repeatedly re-wrote a letter to Theresa May, the home secretary, to play down her links with former home secretary Lord Brittan, it has emerged.The head of the government’s inquiry into historic child sexual abuse allegations repeatedly re-wrote a letter to Theresa May, the home secretary, to play down her links with former home secretary Lord Brittan, it has emerged.
Fiona Woolf has faced calls to resign over her close personal relationship with Brittan, who was in charge of the Home Office in the 1980s when it is alleged there was a Home Office cover up of sexual abuse. Fiona Woolf has faced calls to resign over her close personal relationship with Brittan, who was in charge of the Home Office in the 1980s when it is alleged there was a coverup at the department of sexual abuse.
The home affairs select committee revealed that a formal letter between Woolf and May was re-written seven times, with Home Office assistance.The home affairs select committee revealed that a formal letter between Woolf and May was re-written seven times, with Home Office assistance.
Keith Vaz MP, the chairman of the Commons committee, said the re-writes “gave a sense of greater detachment between Lord and Lady Brittan and Mrs Woolf”. He added it is extraordinary that the letter had to be rewritten seven times. Keith Vaz MP, the chairman of the Commons committee, said the re-writes “gave a sense of greater detachment between Lord and Lady Brittan and Mrs Woolf”.
He added that it was extraordinary that the letter had needed to be rewritten seven times.
Even facts about Woolf’s contact with Lord and Lady Brittan appeared to have been amended, he said.Even facts about Woolf’s contact with Lord and Lady Brittan appeared to have been amended, he said.
“Mrs Woolf’s letter to the committee raises more questions than it answers about an appointment process that has been chaotic, and a series of exchanges with the Home Office and others, where words, and sometimes even facts, have been amended.“Mrs Woolf’s letter to the committee raises more questions than it answers about an appointment process that has been chaotic, and a series of exchanges with the Home Office and others, where words, and sometimes even facts, have been amended.
“It is extraordinary that Mrs Woolf did not even write the first draft of her letter which was supposed to detail her own personal experiences.“It is extraordinary that Mrs Woolf did not even write the first draft of her letter which was supposed to detail her own personal experiences.
“The letter then underwent seven drafts with a multiplicity of editors. “The letter then underwent seven drafts with a multiplicity of editors. The final version gave a sense of greater detachment between Lord and Lady Brittan and Mrs Woolf than her previous attempts.”
“The final version gave a sense of greater detachment between Lord and Lady Brittan and Mrs Woolf than her previous attempts.”
The home affairs select committee published all the various drafts of the letter on its website.The home affairs select committee published all the various drafts of the letter on its website.
The first person appointed to head the inquiry, Baroness Butler-Sloss, was forced to resign before proceedings had got underway after it emerged her brother, Michael Havers, may have had to make legal decisions about abuse allegations in his role as attorney general in the 1980s. The first person appointed to head the inquiry, Lady Butler-Sloss, was forced to resign before proceedings had got under way after it emerged her brother, Lord Havers, may have had to make legal decisions about abuse allegations in his role as attorney general in the 1980s.
Vaz said: “The lessons of the Butler-Sloss appointment and resignation have not been learned.Vaz said: “The lessons of the Butler-Sloss appointment and resignation have not been learned.
“There should have been full disclosure of this information before, not after, her appointment.” “There should have been full disclosure of this information before, not after, her appointment.” It has been claimed that Lord Brittan was handed a file – now missing – in late 1983 which allegedly detailed child abuse at the highest levels of Westminster.
It has been claimed that Lord Brittan was handed a file - now missing - in late 1983 which allegedly detailed child abuse at the highest levels of Westminster. Woolf, the Lord Mayor of London and former president of the Law Society, had earlier detailed in the four-page letter how she had lived in the same London road as Lord Brittan and his wife since 2004 and had been with them at a series of dinner parties. Woolf, who is the Lord Mayor of London and a former president of the Law Society, had earlier detailed in the four-page letter how she had lived in the same road in the capital as Lord Brittan and his wife since 2004 and had been with them at a series of dinner parties.
As well as inviting the Brittans to dinner at her house three times, she had dined at theirs twice, met Lady Brittan for coffee, sat on a prize-giving panel with her, and sponsored her £50 for a fun run. As well as inviting the Brittans to dinner at her house three times, she had dined at their home twice, met Lady Brittan for coffee, sat on a prize-giving panel with her, and sponsored her £50 for a fun run.