This article is from the source 'washpo' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.washingtonpost.com/us-gdp-grows-at-35-percent-in-third-quarter/2014/10/30/1c6d4f28-1567-4a20-879e-9b48438b158c_story.html?wprss=rss_homepage

The article has changed 4 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
U.S. GDP grows at 3.5 percent in third quarter U.S. GDP grows at 3.5 percent in third quarter
(about 1 hour later)
The U.S. economy grew at a 3.5 percent annualized rate between July and September, the government said Thursday morning, providing fresh hope that a stubbornly slow-footed recovery could be gaining speed. The U.S. economy grew at a 3.5 percent annualized rate between July and September, the government said Thursday morning, providing fresh hope that a stubbornly slow-footed recovery could be gaining some momentum.
The latest gross domestic product figure, released by the Commerce Department, slightly exceeded analyst predictions and caps America’s strongest six-month period of expansion since 2003. It also follows the Federal Reserve decision Wednesday to end its bond-buying program, a sign of confidence that the economy no longer needed its “booster shot” injection. The latest gross domestic product figure, released by the Commerce Department, slightly exceeded analyst predictions and caps America’s strongest six-month period of expansion since 2003. It also follows the Federal Reserve decision Wednesday to end its bond-buying program, a sign of confidence that the economy no longer needed its “booster shot” injection.
Growth in the third quarter was driven by continued solid spending on consumer goods and got an extra boost in two key areas. National defense expenditures spiked 16 percent, and the trade deficit shrank likely because the oil-rich U.S. is now importing fewer fossil fuels. Still, some economists said the third-quarter growth numbers had a misleading veneer. Business investment and consumer spending, solid throughout the recovery, dipped slightly from the second quarter. Meantime the economy was boosted by two surprise factors a 16 percent spike in national defense expenditures and a shrinking trade deficit. Defense spending is notoriously unpredictable, with the potential to be skewed by one major order. Trade, too, can’t be counted on for long-term growth, particularly as the Chinese and European economies slow down.
The latest data underscores how the U.S.’s economy, despite little wage growth, is still outpacing those of most other advanced nations, particularly as Europe tumbles. The 3.5 percent growth “pretty much makes us the envy of the world, with the exception of China,” said Alan MacEachin, an economist at the Navy Federal Credit Union. “The headline number 3.5 percent is awfully good,” said Josh Bivens, research and policy director at the Economic Policy Institute. “But once you start digging into it, there’s not a ton of evidence we’ve actually shifted into a higher gear.”
"But looking forward," MacEachin said, "if we don’t see some turnaround in Europe, and if China and Japan don’t reverse their [slowdowns], it will be hard for the U.S. to be the locomotive that pulls the growth." Still, U.S. officials emphasized that the latest GDP figure, a measure of all goods and services produced, outpaced those of other advanced countries and reflected the country’s improving labor market and growing oil and gas supply.
“Since the financial crisis, the U.S. economy has bounced back more strongly than most others around the world, and the recent data highlight that the United States is continuing to lead the global recovery,” Jason Furman, chairman of the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers, said in a statement.
Some economists say the latest GDP figure provides a truer sense of economic health than earlier quarterly figures this year, which veered from very cold to very hot. Between January and March, the economy contracted at an annual rate of 2.1 percent — the sharpest decline since the depths of the Great Recession. Then, in the three month following, the GDP grew at a rate of 4.6 percent, a level not topped since eight years ago.Some economists say the latest GDP figure provides a truer sense of economic health than earlier quarterly figures this year, which veered from very cold to very hot. Between January and March, the economy contracted at an annual rate of 2.1 percent — the sharpest decline since the depths of the Great Recession. Then, in the three month following, the GDP grew at a rate of 4.6 percent, a level not topped since eight years ago.
Most analysts now say that the first quarter slide stemmed from a horrid East Coast winter that kept consumers indoors. They say that the second quarter was buoyed by a bounce-back effect, a release of all that pent-up demand for cars and homes. The third quarter ended up between those two extremes, a middle ground that reflects a complicated period in which payrolls grew steadily, stocks showed some volatility, and concerns mounted about a European economy sliding into recession.Most analysts now say that the first quarter slide stemmed from a horrid East Coast winter that kept consumers indoors. They say that the second quarter was buoyed by a bounce-back effect, a release of all that pent-up demand for cars and homes. The third quarter ended up between those two extremes, a middle ground that reflects a complicated period in which payrolls grew steadily, stocks showed some volatility, and concerns mounted about a European economy sliding into recession.
The GDP is still subject to revision. Consumer spending drives about two-thirds of the measure and climbed 1.8 percent in the third quarter, compared with 2.5 percent in the second. Economists had been hoping to see a greater surge in household spending, given that declining gas prices helped fatten their pocketbooks.
Spending on new homes also contributed little to growth in the latest quarter. Such investment — which often accompanies recoveries — surged in 2012 and into 2013, but now appears to be fading.
The U.S. economic recovery is now strong enough that the Fed voted on Wednesday to end its long-running stimulus campaign this month. The Fed has bought more than $1 trillion in long-term bonds over the past two years in hopes of boosting job growth. During that time, the unemployment rate has fallen nearly two percentage points to 5.9 percent and hiring has surged to an average of more than 200,00 jobs a month this year.The U.S. economic recovery is now strong enough that the Fed voted on Wednesday to end its long-running stimulus campaign this month. The Fed has bought more than $1 trillion in long-term bonds over the past two years in hopes of boosting job growth. During that time, the unemployment rate has fallen nearly two percentage points to 5.9 percent and hiring has surged to an average of more than 200,00 jobs a month this year.
"There has been a substantial improvement in the outlook for the labor market," the Fed said in an official statement released Wednesday. It added that the central bank also sees "sufficient underlying strength in the broader economy to support ongoing progress toward maximum employment in a context of price stability.""There has been a substantial improvement in the outlook for the labor market," the Fed said in an official statement released Wednesday. It added that the central bank also sees "sufficient underlying strength in the broader economy to support ongoing progress toward maximum employment in a context of price stability."
The Fed has also kept its target for short-term interest rates at zero for the past six years. Officials said they will calibrate the timing of the first rate increase to the health of the economy. A stronger recovery could push them to move more quickly, while slower growth could delay any move.The Fed has also kept its target for short-term interest rates at zero for the past six years. Officials said they will calibrate the timing of the first rate increase to the health of the economy. A stronger recovery could push them to move more quickly, while slower growth could delay any move.
Ylan Q. Mui contributed to this report.Ylan Q. Mui contributed to this report.