This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk_politics/7148108.stm

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Falconer opposes longer detention Falconer opposes longer detention
(20 minutes later)
Plans to extend the detention without charge limit for terror suspects from 28 to 42 days have been criticised by ex-Lord Chancellor, Lord Falconer.Plans to extend the detention without charge limit for terror suspects from 28 to 42 days have been criticised by ex-Lord Chancellor, Lord Falconer.
He told BBC Radio 4's World at One the measure was "not necessary and not needed to fight terrorism".He told BBC Radio 4's World at One the measure was "not necessary and not needed to fight terrorism".
Lord Falconer, who backed Tony Blair's attempt to extend the limit to 90 days, says he has changed his mind because suspects are being charged earlier.Lord Falconer, who backed Tony Blair's attempt to extend the limit to 90 days, says he has changed his mind because suspects are being charged earlier.
He also dismissed the key safeguard offered to win over sceptics.He also dismissed the key safeguard offered to win over sceptics.
Lord Falconer said that allowing a vote in Parliament on any case where detention went beyond 28 days was not realistic and risked compromising any police investigation.Lord Falconer said that allowing a vote in Parliament on any case where detention went beyond 28 days was not realistic and risked compromising any police investigation.
He is the latest in a series of high profile figures - including the director of public prosecutions and ex-attorney general Lord Goldsmith - to criticise the plans. 'Solution to the problem'?
He said an "artificial" limit of 28, 42 or 90 days for holding a terror suspect without charge was not needed if the threshold for when charges should be brought was lowered.
Usually a person is not charged unless there is a 51% chance of the case being a success, he said.
How can Parliament make a judgement about an individual investigation? Lord Falconer
Now the Director of Public Prosecutions has indicated this threshold can be lowered so that people can be charged when there is a less than 51% chance of success.
"It is, I believe, the solution to the problem," he said, because it removed the "ever increasing pressure" to push up the days for holding terror suspects without charge.
Lord Falconer said he did not agree with plans to give Parliament a vote when detention went beyond 28 days.
"I don't see that as a realistic possibility. How can Parliament make a judgement about an individual investigation?" he asked.
Lord Falconer is the latest in a series of high profile figures - including the director of public prosecutions and ex-attorney general Lord Goldsmith - to criticise the plans.
And two Parliamentary committees - the Home Affairs and the joint committee on human rights - both came out last week against extending the terror limit.And two Parliamentary committees - the Home Affairs and the joint committee on human rights - both came out last week against extending the terror limit.
'Potential risk''Potential risk'
Home Secretary Jacqui Smith says that because of the increasing complexity of terrorism cases, police may need to hold someone longer than 28 days in order to "prosecute people who want to cause murder and mayhem on our streets".Home Secretary Jacqui Smith says that because of the increasing complexity of terrorism cases, police may need to hold someone longer than 28 days in order to "prosecute people who want to cause murder and mayhem on our streets".
But plans to extend the limit before have proved controversial and moves to extend it to 90 days in 2005 were defeated by a combination of Tory, Lib Dem and some Labour MPs.But plans to extend the limit before have proved controversial and moves to extend it to 90 days in 2005 were defeated by a combination of Tory, Lib Dem and some Labour MPs.
The home secretary has said she wants to get a consensus on any extension, but there is little sign of one at the moment.The home secretary has said she wants to get a consensus on any extension, but there is little sign of one at the moment.
Her proposals would involve the House of Commons and the House of Lords approving an extension to 42 days in exceptional cases, within 30 days. Her proposals would involve the House of Commons and the House of Lords retrospectively being asked to approve any decision to hold an individual for longer than the 28 days, up to the 42 days maximum.
"As home secretary I am not willing to leave this potential risk to the security of the British people unaddressed," she said."As home secretary I am not willing to leave this potential risk to the security of the British people unaddressed," she said.