This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/23/us/us-military-is-scrutinized-over-trash-burning-in-afghanistan.html

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
U.S. Military Is Scrutinized Over Trash Burning in Afghanistan U.S. Military Is Scrutinized Over Trash Burning in Afghanistan
(about 1 hour later)
The United States military spent millions of dollars on garbage incinerators in Afghanistan that went unused as tons of trash burned in open piles, wafting toxic smoke over thousands of troops, according to a report released Tuesday by an American watchdog agency.The United States military spent millions of dollars on garbage incinerators in Afghanistan that went unused as tons of trash burned in open piles, wafting toxic smoke over thousands of troops, according to a report released Tuesday by an American watchdog agency.
The new report focused on Shindand Air Base in western Afghanistan but echoed the findings of three previous reports by the agency, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, since April 2013. All found that the Defense Department wasted millions of dollars on incinerators at major bases that operated at a fraction of capacity — if at all — while the open burning of toxic material continued.The new report focused on Shindand Air Base in western Afghanistan but echoed the findings of three previous reports by the agency, the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction, since April 2013. All found that the Defense Department wasted millions of dollars on incinerators at major bases that operated at a fraction of capacity — if at all — while the open burning of toxic material continued.
The reports also concluded that the military in Afghanistan violated regulations put in place by Congress and the Pentagon to end large-scale open-pit trash burning after the health risks of the practice gained national attention during the war in Iraq.The reports also concluded that the military in Afghanistan violated regulations put in place by Congress and the Pentagon to end large-scale open-pit trash burning after the health risks of the practice gained national attention during the war in Iraq.
Despite these regulations, every base in Afghanistan visited by inspectors continued to burn waste, including tires, plastics, batteries and other potentially toxic junk, in open pits, sometimes shunting the smoky job off to Afghan troops. And though a 2010 law requires the military to notify Congress whenever certain toxic materials are burned, the report said no notifications were sent.Despite these regulations, every base in Afghanistan visited by inspectors continued to burn waste, including tires, plastics, batteries and other potentially toxic junk, in open pits, sometimes shunting the smoky job off to Afghan troops. And though a 2010 law requires the military to notify Congress whenever certain toxic materials are burned, the report said no notifications were sent.
“There was a lack of planning and a lack of holding people accountable and as a result the health of our troops was put at risk,” John F. Sopko, special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction, said Tuesday.“There was a lack of planning and a lack of holding people accountable and as a result the health of our troops was put at risk,” John F. Sopko, special inspector general for Afghanistan reconstruction, said Tuesday.
While the science remains inconclusive, there is growing concern among veterans, members of Congress and some medical experts that exposure to the acrid smoke from military burn pits in Iraq and Afghanistan could lead to lasting health problems, including lung disease and cancer.While the science remains inconclusive, there is growing concern among veterans, members of Congress and some medical experts that exposure to the acrid smoke from military burn pits in Iraq and Afghanistan could lead to lasting health problems, including lung disease and cancer.
“When you burn this caustic, dangerous stuff, it can release neurotoxins, carcinogens,” said Dr. Anthony Szema, assistant professor of medicine at Stony Brook University School of Medicine in New York, who has studied lung problems among war veterans. “There are long-term health effects. This is a ticking time bomb here that could last for years.”“When you burn this caustic, dangerous stuff, it can release neurotoxins, carcinogens,” said Dr. Anthony Szema, assistant professor of medicine at Stony Brook University School of Medicine in New York, who has studied lung problems among war veterans. “There are long-term health effects. This is a ticking time bomb here that could last for years.”
At Shindand, inspectors found that the military spent $5 million on incinerators. The equipment was large enough to handle all trash produced by the 4,000 coalition troops and contractors at the base, but for two years about two-thirds was burned in nearby pits run by Afghan troops.At Shindand, inspectors found that the military spent $5 million on incinerators. The equipment was large enough to handle all trash produced by the 4,000 coalition troops and contractors at the base, but for two years about two-thirds was burned in nearby pits run by Afghan troops.
The report noted that an “Afghan-run open-air burn pit burned at much lower temperatures and thus smoldered much of the time, creating large volumes of smoke and volatile gases.”The report noted that an “Afghan-run open-air burn pit burned at much lower temperatures and thus smoldered much of the time, creating large volumes of smoke and volatile gases.”
Afghan troops at Shindand also had expensive incinerators supplied by the United States, but never used them, the report said, “because the open-air burn pit costs less to operate.”Afghan troops at Shindand also had expensive incinerators supplied by the United States, but never used them, the report said, “because the open-air burn pit costs less to operate.”
In June 2013, American troops began using their incinerators at full capacity. Later, the Afghans began putting their trash in a landfill.In June 2013, American troops began using their incinerators at full capacity. Later, the Afghans began putting their trash in a landfill.
In a written response to the report, United States Central Command said it conducted an inquiry into concerns that toxic materials were improperly burned without notifying Congress, but said it had no control over how Afghan forces disposed of trash.In a written response to the report, United States Central Command said it conducted an inquiry into concerns that toxic materials were improperly burned without notifying Congress, but said it had no control over how Afghan forces disposed of trash.
In earlier reports, inspectors found similar dysfunction at three other bases. At Camp Salerno, incinerators costing $5 million were so poorly constructed, with rusting electric motors and leaking hydraulic lines, that they were never used, and commanders did not push for repairs because the risk of mortar and rocket attack made the incinerators too dangerous to operate. At Forward Operating Base Sharana, incinerators costing $5.4 million were never used, in part because design flaws kept trucks from being able to dump trash into the machines. Camp Leather Neck spent $11.5 million on incinerators, but, during several inspections in 2013, the vast majority of its waste continued to be thrown into the two-story-high flames of the burn pit on the edge of the base because there was no contractor to run the incinerators.In earlier reports, inspectors found similar dysfunction at three other bases. At Camp Salerno, incinerators costing $5 million were so poorly constructed, with rusting electric motors and leaking hydraulic lines, that they were never used, and commanders did not push for repairs because the risk of mortar and rocket attack made the incinerators too dangerous to operate. At Forward Operating Base Sharana, incinerators costing $5.4 million were never used, in part because design flaws kept trucks from being able to dump trash into the machines. Camp Leather Neck spent $11.5 million on incinerators, but, during several inspections in 2013, the vast majority of its waste continued to be thrown into the two-story-high flames of the burn pit on the edge of the base because there was no contractor to run the incinerators.
“As a result,” a previous report said, “possible long-term health risks to the camp’s personnel continue.”“As a result,” a previous report said, “possible long-term health risks to the camp’s personnel continue.”
With the concern over burn-pit exposure growing, Congress ordered the Department of Veterans Affairs this year to set up an registry to collect data on veterans concerned about exposure. The registry went online in June.With the concern over burn-pit exposure growing, Congress ordered the Department of Veterans Affairs this year to set up an registry to collect data on veterans concerned about exposure. The registry went online in June.
Dr. Szema, who treats patients at a Veterans Affairs hospital on Long Island, said he had studied hundreds of young troops returning with damaged lungs. While the cause of the damage is unclear, and may be caused in part to desert dust, exotic bacteria or bomb blasts, Dr. Szema said burn pits were also a possible culprit. Dr. Szema, who treats patients at a Veterans Affairs hospital on Long Island, said he had studied hundreds of young troops returning with damaged lungs. While the cause of the damage is unclear, and may be caused in part by desert dust, exotic bacteria or bomb blasts, Dr. Szema said burn pits were also a possible culprit.
“You don’t need a doctor to tell you not to burn your trash,” he said.“You don’t need a doctor to tell you not to burn your trash,” he said.