This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/sport/2014/jul/22/jimmy-anderson-full-hearing-ravindra-jadeja-england-india

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 2 Version 3
Jimmy Anderson to face hearing over Ravindra Jadeja spat on 1 August Jimmy Anderson to face hearing over Ravindra Jadeja spat on 1 August
(about 7 hours later)
The England fast bowler Jimmy Anderson, who has been charged with a level three breach of the ICC code of conduct, will face a full disciplinary hearing before a judicial commissioner on Friday 1 August at 9.00am. Jimmy Anderson, who has been charged by India with “abusing and pushing” Ravindra Jadeja, will face a disciplinary hearing before a judicial commissioner on Friday 1 August.
Anderson has been charged by India with “abusing and pushing” Ravinda Jadeja after an incident that took place in the Trent Bridge pavilion at lunch on the second day of that Test match. The England paceman was charged with a level three breach of the International Cricket Council’s code of conduct after an incident that took place in the Trent Bridge pavilion at lunch on the second day of the opening Test. He faces a ban of up to four Tests.
England counter-charged Jadeja with a level two offence alleging that he approached Anderson in a threatening manner and it is expected that the all-rounder’s case will be heard by the match referee David Boon during the Southampton Test match next week. If found guilty, Jadeja faces either a fine of between 50-100% of his match fee or a ban of one Test match. England countercharged Jadeja with a level two offence alleging that he approached Anderson in a threatening manner. It is expected that Jadeja’s case will be heard by the Trent Bridge match referee, David Boon, during the third Test at Southampton next week. If found guilty, Jadeja faces either a fine of 50-100% of his match fee or a ban of one Test match.
A level two breach is less serious than a level three and so is subject to disciplinary hearing heard by the match referee rather than a judicial commissioner. The ECB pressed for both Anderson’s and Jadeja’s hearings to be held at the same time as they both relate to the same incident and will both hear the same evidence but it was decided to stick to the letter of the ICC processes and hold separate hearings. A level two breach is subject to disciplinary hearing by the match referee rather than a judicial commissioner. The England and Wales Cricket Board pressed for Anderson’s and Jadeja’s hearings to be held at the same time as they relate to the same incident and will hear the same evidence but it was decided to stick to the letter of the ICC processes and hold separate hearings.
The date for Anderson was decided during a preliminary hearing attended by the bowler’s representative, ECB representatives, the ICC’s ethics and regulatory lawyer and representatives of the Indian board and their legal counsel. The date for Anderson was decided during a preliminary hearing on Tuesday attended by the bowler’s representative, ECB representatives, the ICC’s ethics and regulatory lawyer and representatives of the Indian board and their legal counsel.
At the end of the full hearing via video conference, the judicial commissioner Gordon Lewis will have 48 hours to announce his decision in writing. If found guilty, Anderson faces a ban of between two and four matches which could see him miss the final two Tests of this series including his “home” Test at Old Trafford in a couple of weeks. Lewis was the commissioner when Australia’s David Warner was suspended after attacking Joe Root in a bar in Birmingham. At the end of the full hearing via video conference, the judicial commissioner, Gordon Lewis, will have 48 hours to announce his decision in writing. If found guilty, Anderson faces a ban of between two and four matches which would almost certainly see him miss the final two Tests of this series including his “home” Test at Old Trafford. Lewis was the commissioner when Australia’s David Warner was suspended after attacking Joe Root in a bar in Birmingham.
The ECB can lodge an appeal against any punishment but unless there is special dispensation any ban would take effect immediately and would need to be served while an appeal process was taking place. The ECB can lodge an appeal against any punishment but, unless there is special dispensation, any ban would take effect immediately and need to be served while an appeal process was taking place. If the commissioner finds Anderson not guilty of a level three breach, it remains open to him to find the player guilty of an offence at a lower level.
If the judicial commissioner finds Anderson not guilty of a level three breach it remains open to him to find him guilty of an offence at a lower level England were stunned when told of India’s intention to press charges and were hoping that the preliminary hearing would result in the case being thrown out. However, it is clear that the commissioner and the ICC’s regulatory lawyer believe there is a case to be heard. Anderson denies the accusations and England have pledged their total support for him.
England were stunned when originally told of India’s intention to press charges against Anderson and were hoping that this preliminary hearing would result in the case being thrown out. However, it is clear that the judicial commissioner and the ICC’s regulatory lawyer believe there is a case to be heard. Anderson denies the accusations and England responded to India’s charged by pledging their total support for him. Alastair Cook said India’s allegations towards Anderson were designed to unsettle England’s leading bowler. “It’s probably a bit of a tactic by India,” Cook said before the second Test. “We are surprised but we can’t let it be a distraction.”
Prior to the Lord’s Test, the England captain Alastair Cook said he thought that India’s allegations towards Anderson were designed to unsettle England’s leading bowler. “It’s probably a bit of a tactic by India,” Cook said. “We are surprised, but we can’t let it be a distraction.” In this spat it was Jadeja who got the last laugh in the Lord’s Test when he scored a match-defining 68 from 57 balls and completed India’s victory by running out Anderson.
In this on-going spat, it was Jadeja who got the last laugh in the Lord’s Test scoring a match-defining 68 from 57 balls and completing India’s victory by running out Anderson.