This article is from the source 'bbc' and was first published or seen on . It will not be checked again for changes.
You can find the current article at its original source at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/rss/-/1/hi/uk/7104222.stm
The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.
Previous version
1
Next version
Version 0 | Version 1 |
---|---|
Coroner may contest Diana ruling | Coroner may contest Diana ruling |
(3 days later) | |
The coroner in the Princess Diana inquest has said he may appeal against a ruling blocking the use of statements from paparazzi who refuse to attend. | The coroner in the Princess Diana inquest has said he may appeal against a ruling blocking the use of statements from paparazzi who refuse to attend. |
Lord Justice Scott Baker had said the French photographers' statements could be admitted as evidence. | Lord Justice Scott Baker had said the French photographers' statements could be admitted as evidence. |
However, the High Court backed a challenge to this ruling. | However, the High Court backed a challenge to this ruling. |
The princess, her companion Dodi Al Fayed and their chauffeur Henri Paul died when their car crashed in Paris while being pursued by photographers. | The princess, her companion Dodi Al Fayed and their chauffeur Henri Paul died when their car crashed in Paris while being pursued by photographers. |
The coroner said the High Court judgement could make it hard to present vital evidence. | The coroner said the High Court judgement could make it hard to present vital evidence. |
Disputed evidence | Disputed evidence |
The photographers were asked to appear in person at the hearing. | The photographers were asked to appear in person at the hearing. |
They declined, and the French government has backed their right not to appear. | They declined, and the French government has backed their right not to appear. |
Lord Justice Scott Baker decided their statements could be read to the jury, in order to allow the evidence to be heard. | Lord Justice Scott Baker decided their statements could be read to the jury, in order to allow the evidence to be heard. |
But lawyers acting for the family of Mr Paul and for Mohamed Al Fayed, Dodi's father, said they should be able to cross-examine the paparazzi. | But lawyers acting for the family of Mr Paul and for Mohamed Al Fayed, Dodi's father, said they should be able to cross-examine the paparazzi. |
They argued that the Coroners' Rules 1984 prevented the admission of purely written evidence unless it was "unlikely to be disputed". | They argued that the Coroners' Rules 1984 prevented the admission of purely written evidence unless it was "unlikely to be disputed". |
'Determined' | 'Determined' |
On Tuesday, Judges Lord Justice Thomas and Mr Justice Aikens ruled in their favour. | |
But Lord Justice Scott Baker said he had immediately and successfully applied for leave to appeal their judgment. | But Lord Justice Scott Baker said he had immediately and successfully applied for leave to appeal their judgment. |
In a statement, he said the judges' decision could "add materially to the length and cost of these inquests", and make it "more difficult" to allow the jury to hear evidence from absent witnesses. | In a statement, he said the judges' decision could "add materially to the length and cost of these inquests", and make it "more difficult" to allow the jury to hear evidence from absent witnesses. |
He added that he was "determined to do his utmost to ensure that all relevant evidence is put before the jury". | He added that he was "determined to do his utmost to ensure that all relevant evidence is put before the jury". |
Previous version
1
Next version