This article is from the source 'independent' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/middle-east/iraq-crisis-barack-obama-says-us-will-not-send-in-troops-but-is-reviewing-options-to-help-fight-isis-9535810.html

The article has changed 5 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Iraq crisis: Barack Obama says US will not send in troops but is 'reviewing options' to help fight Isis Iraq crisis: Obama says United States will not send in troops but will 'play its part'
(35 minutes later)
President Barack Obama has said US troops will not be sent into Iraq again to combat Islamist militants overrunning parts of the country. The United States will “play its part” in defending the integrity of Iraq against the jihadist insurgency that has taken control of cities in its west and north, Barack Obama said today, but he made clear that the government of Nouri al-Maliki must take steps first to overcome sectarian political divisions in the country.
In a speech outside the White House on Friday afternoon, the US leader said his country would offer assistance to the Iraqi government in its struggle against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (Isis) but that would not amount to military intervention. Addressing the fast developing events on the ground in Iraq, Mr Obama reassured Americans at home that deploying ground troops in Iraq is not something he is willing to consider.
Since the rebels swept down from the north, seizing control of Mosul, Iraq's second-largest city, among others, commentators in the US raised fears over the prospect of another Iraq invasion. But he clearly indicated that plans are being drawn up to give support to the Iraqi military. That would most likely be aerial support and there were reports of the Pentagon preparing to order the George HW Bush aircraft carrier into the Persian Gulf this weekend.
Calling Isis "terrorists", Mr Obama said the group's rise posed an international threat and the conflict could affect oil supplies but stressed that the responsibility lay with the Iraqi administration and regional neighbours to stop it. Mr Obama, who came to the presidency in part on a pledge to end US involvement in Iraq, said he was not yet at the point of making any decisions and instead would be waiting for evidence of Mr al-Maliki, a Shia who has shut out Sunni leaders from the Iraqi government, taking steps towards political reconciliation.
"We will not be sending US troops back into combat," he said. "We are reviewing a range of other options." “The United States is simply not going to involve itself in a military action in the absence of a political plan by the Iraqis that gives us some assurance that they are willing to work together,” Mr Obama said in response to questions after delivering a brief statement on the South Lawn of the White House.
The President said that the crisis in Iraq was not a purely military challenge and the Iraqi government needed a "political plan" to combat the sectarian divide between Sunni and Shia Muslims that is coming to boiling point. “We’re not going to allow ourselves to be dragged back into a situation in which, while we're there we're keeping a lid on things, and after enormous sacrifices by us, after we're not there, people start acting in ways that are not conducive to the long-term stability” of Iraq.
Isis - a Sunni fundamentalist movement advocating Sharia law - has been gaining fighters and public support as an alternative to Iraq's Shia-led government. Vehicles belonging to Iraqi security forces burn following clashes in Mosul
Vehicles belonging to Iraqi security forces burn following clashes in Mosul Mr Obama said Iraqi security forces had not been "willing to stand and fight" the rebels after reports that soldiers abandoned their posts with no resistance to Isis. The timeline for possible military action seemingly therefore will be determined at least in part by Mr al-Maliki’s response and not just events on the ground. “People shouldn’t anticipate that this is something that is going to happen overnight,” Mr Obama said. “We want to make sure we have gathered all the intelligence that is necessary so that if in fact I do direct and order any actions there that they are targeted, they're precise and they're going to have an effect”.
He added: "We will do our part but understand, it's ultimately up to the Iraqis as a sovereign nation to solve their own problems." His unwillingness to rush to a decision comes in spite of heavy pressure from some on Capitol Hill. 
The President did not rule out drone strikes or elaborate on the options being considered but said they would be reviewed in the coming days. Senator John McCain of Arizona today repeated his case that Mr Obama and the administration brought the crisis on themselves by agreeing to pull out all US troops back in 2011. “President [Obama] wanted out, and now, we are paying a very heavy price,” Mr McCain said. 
Isis have vowed to take Baghdad and entered the nearby towns of Jalula and Sadiyah, just 60 miles away, on Thursday. Mr Obama underscored the complexity of the crisis, not least the reality that the marauding Sunni fighters have been part emanated from neighbouring Syria. “This is a regional problem, and it is going to be a long-term problem. And what we’re going to have to do is combine selective actions by our military to make sure that we’re going after terrorists who could harm our personnel overseas or eventually hit the homeland,” he said.
The UN said hundreds have been killed - with militants carrying out summary executions of civilians in Mosul, including 17 civilians in one street. In London, John Kerry, the Secretary of State, took time to explain why the US might intervene in Iraq when it hasn’t in Syria.  “Iraq is a country we’ve had a very direct relationship with, very direct investment and engagement with, not to mention the lives of our soldiers who were lost there, providing this opportunity to them,” he remarked at the end of a conference on combating sexual violence in conflict zones.
Up to 30 civilians were also killed in heavy shelling of residential areas in Mosul on 6 and 8 of June by government forces. “I don't think anybody in the region, or in this administration, believes it is in the interest of the United States to turn our backs on that.”
David Cameron and William Hague have stressed that the UK will not be sending in troops.
A team from the Department for International Development has been flown to northern Iraq to see what humanitarian help the UK can give, Mr Hague said Britain is ready to advise the Baghdad administration.