This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jun/10/bowe-bergdahl-fox-news-experts

The article has changed 3 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Bowe Bergdahl is Fox News' perfect villain for the propaganda machine Bowe Bergdahl is Fox News' perfect villain for the propaganda machine
(about 2 hours later)
BookingBooking
guests for cable news can be a taxing job. You're underpaid,guests for cable news can be a taxing job. You're underpaid,
overworked and constantly on deadline. It's no surprise, then, that most bookersoverworked and constantly on deadline. It's no surprise, then, that most bookers
form a symbiotic relationship with PR people, "fixers" who specialize inform a symbiotic relationship with PR people, "fixers" who specialize in
connecting producers with the right expert, in possession of the rightconnecting producers with the right expert, in possession of the right
point-of-view, right away. The pitfall, of course, is that when someone ispoint-of-view, right away. The pitfall, of course, is that when someone is
desperate to go on television, it's usually a safe bet that they have an axe todesperate to go on television, it's usually a safe bet that they have an axe to
grind. Ideally, the booking producer acts as a gatekeeper, to filter out those who aregrind. Ideally, the booking producer acts as a gatekeeper, to filter out those who are
pushing an agenda.pushing an agenda.
There's no such filter at Fox NewsThere's no such filter at Fox News
Channel, where pundits are not onlyChannel, where pundits are not only
allowed to push an agenda but are very much expected to do so. Guests at Fox are bookedallowed to push an agenda but are very much expected to do so. Guests at Fox are booked
specifically to advance the latest anti-government narrative – be it Obamacarespecifically to advance the latest anti-government narrative – be it Obamacare
or Benghazi, the Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy or now the released Sergeant Boweor Benghazi, the Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy or now the released Sergeant Bowe
Bergdahl ... or on some nights, all of the above.Bergdahl ... or on some nights, all of the above.
I say this as someone who spent theI say this as someone who spent the
better part of Obama's first term tracking down guests for the O'Reilly Factor: when you're a guest on Fox, having anbetter part of Obama's first term tracking down guests for the O'Reilly Factor: when you're a guest on Fox, having an
axe to grind is kind of the whole point.axe to grind is kind of the whole point.
One of the driving forces behind Fox's all-out, week-and-a-half-long campaignOne of the driving forces behind Fox's all-out, week-and-a-half-long campaign
to paint Bergdahl as a traitor is reportedly the PR firm runto paint Bergdahl as a traitor is reportedly the PR firm run
by Richard Grenell, a GOP operative who worked for the George W Bush White House and Mitt Romney campaign –by Richard Grenell, a GOP operative who worked for the George W Bush White House and Mitt Romney campaign –
and a Fox News contributor. Grenell has been busily connectingand a Fox News contributor. Grenell has been busily connecting
soldiers from Bergdahl’s unit ("pro bono", as if that mattered) withsoldiers from Bergdahl’s unit ("pro bono", as if that mattered) with
media organizations, most ofmedia organizations, most of
which have included disclaimer that the interviews were facilitatedwhich have included disclaimer that the interviews were facilitated
by “strategists”.by “strategists”.
But in Week Two of Bergdahl-gazi, Fox has apparently decided that disseminatingBut in Week Two of Bergdahl-gazi, Fox has apparently decided that disseminating
the propaganda is more important than informing viewers about the identity ofthe propaganda is more important than informing viewers about the identity of
those pushing it.those pushing it.
Case in point: Josh Cornelison, a medicCase in point: Josh Cornelison, a medic
who served alongside Bergdahl, wentwho served alongside Bergdahl, went
on Fox News Sunday to declare that "the American people need to be educated that Boweon Fox News Sunday to declare that "the American people need to be educated that Bowe
Berdgahl is not a hero". But host Chris WallaceBerdgahl is not a hero". But host Chris Wallace
made no mention that the soldier – the same one with whom the New York Times arranged anmade no mention that the soldier – the same one with whom the New York Times arranged an
interview by way of those "Republican strategists" – alsointerview by way of those "Republican strategists" – also
happened to be employed by his network.happened to be employed by his network.
No one is saying that the opinions ofNo one is saying that the opinions of
the Bergdahl's fellow soldiers should be discounted simply because they'vethe Bergdahl's fellow soldiers should be discounted simply because they've
affiliated themselves with a partisan minder, but it's information thataffiliated themselves with a partisan minder, but it's information that
Wallace's viewers deserve to have.Wallace's viewers deserve to have.
I consider Wallace a serious andI consider Wallace a serious and
generally tough journalist who should know better – when I was at Fox, he had agenerally tough journalist who should know better – when I was at Fox, he had a
reputation for pushing back against the company line, and refusing to getreputation for pushing back against the company line, and refusing to get
involved in the blatant partisanship that the rest of the anchors casually traffickedinvolved in the blatant partisanship that the rest of the anchors casually trafficked
in – so it was surprising to see him so credulous.in – so it was surprising to see him so credulous.
Now I have no such lofty expectationsNow I have no such lofty expectations
about Sean Hannity, and true to form, he did not disappoint. Onabout Sean Hannity, and true to form, he did not disappoint. On
Saturday night he hosted a hastily-put-together special on Bergdahl,Saturday night he hosted a hastily-put-together special on Bergdahl,
featuring a panel of no lessfeaturing a panel of no less
than 15 regular Foxthan 15 regular Fox
contributors, pundits and guests, all of whom – including Grenell himself in the front row – were arrayed on bleachers facingcontributors, pundits and guests, all of whom – including Grenell himself in the front row – were arrayed on bleachers facing
him like the world's saddest pep rally audience "to help us investigate".him like the world's saddest pep rally audience "to help us investigate".
Hannity started the show with a quick survey of the panel:Hannity started the show with a quick survey of the panel:
I haveI have
interviewed many of those that served with Sergeant Bergdahl. Every one ofinterviewed many of those that served with Sergeant Bergdahl. Every one of
those says he was a deserter, and maybe worse. How many think maybe worse?those says he was a deserter, and maybe worse. How many think maybe worse?
About two-thirds of the panel raisedAbout two-thirds of the panel raised
their hand, as did the host himself.their hand, as did the host himself.
"Wow," Hannity exclaimed, seemingly shocked that his hard-working booker's hand-picked"Wow," Hannity exclaimed, seemingly shocked that his hard-working booker's hand-picked
panel of Bergdahl detractors would somehow believe the worst about the soldier.panel of Bergdahl detractors would somehow believe the worst about the soldier.
The "wow" wasThe "wow" was
noticeably absent on Monday, when a neighbor of the two white supremacistsnoticeably absent on Monday, when a neighbor of the two white supremacists
accused of shooting police in Las Vegas claimed they bragged about having visited the Bundy ranch. (Bundy's son said they'd been kicked out.)accused of shooting police in Las Vegas claimed they bragged about having visited the Bundy ranch. (Bundy's son said they'd been kicked out.)
Could Hannity's weeks-long lionization of BundyCould Hannity's weeks-long lionization of Bundy
and his "revolution" have inspired two unstable "patriots" to go on anand his "revolution" have inspired two unstable "patriots" to go on an
anti-authoritarian shooting spree? There's certainly a stronger case to be madeanti-authoritarian shooting spree? There's certainly a stronger case to be made
for that scenario than there is for the specific soldier deaths for which some onfor that scenario than there is for the specific soldier deaths for which some on
the right are blaming Bergdahl – a claim even Foxthe right are blaming Bergdahl – a claim even Fox
News' own reporting is casting doubt upon.News' own reporting is casting doubt upon.
Fox switches whip to different dead horse: "Obamacare" mentions fall to 184 as "Benghazi" crescendo rises to 1132. pic.twitter.com/BsigXiwsZZFox switches whip to different dead horse: "Obamacare" mentions fall to 184 as "Benghazi" crescendo rises to 1132. pic.twitter.com/BsigXiwsZZ
Fox's latest foray into the fever swampFox's latest foray into the fever swamp
is not unexpected – it's been a rough couple of months for the network. As a diversion from theis not unexpected – it's been a rough couple of months for the network. As a diversion from the
growing success of the Affordable Care Act, Fox switched to Plan B: shouting "Benghazi" as loudlygrowing success of the Affordable Care Act, Fox switched to Plan B: shouting "Benghazi" as loudly
and frequently as possible.and frequently as possible.
Despite hours of airtime, desperateDespite hours of airtime, desperate
flailing from the usual suspects and breathless teasing of a "smoking gun" email, Americansflailing from the usual suspects and breathless teasing of a "smoking gun" email, Americans
weren't buying it: a poll last week found that Fox, even with all its hyperventilating, has been unable to move the needle – the sameweren't buying it: a poll last week found that Fox, even with all its hyperventilating, has been unable to move the needle – the same
percentage of people doubt the administration on Benghazi as they did a yearpercentage of people doubt the administration on Benghazi as they did a year
ago.ago.
Next cameNext came
Bundy, a states-rights hero and a symbol of liberty and the Second Amendment who appeared on the network soBundy, a states-rights hero and a symbol of liberty and the Second Amendment who appeared on the network so
many times it seemed he was days away from being handed Greta Vanmany times it seemed he was days away from being handed Greta Van
Susteren's time slot.Susteren's time slot.
Then he had to ruin everything by going on a rant about "the Negro" inThen he had to ruin everything by going on a rant about "the Negro" in
front of a New York Times reporter.front of a New York Times reporter.
With theWith the
entire network slowly slinking away from the unrepentantly racist Bundy, theentire network slowly slinking away from the unrepentantly racist Bundy, the
outrage machine was in need of something new to stoke it. Andoutrage machine was in need of something new to stoke it. And
as Bill O'Reilly was fond of pointing out during my time at Fox,the only thing that drives more viewers thanas Bill O'Reilly was fond of pointing out during my time at Fox,the only thing that drives more viewers than
a hero ... is a villain.a hero ... is a villain.
And Bergdahl makes for a surprisinglyAnd Bergdahl makes for a surprisingly
good villain. There is the emailgood villain. There is the email
he wrote that he was "ashamed to even be [A]merican]", the video of him performinghe wrote that he was "ashamed to even be [A]merican]", the video of him performing
ballet, a father with a beard that O'Reilly says "looks like a Muslim". Add theseballet, a father with a beard that O'Reilly says "looks like a Muslim". Add these
to Obama vouching for him,to Obama vouching for him,
and Bergdahl never had a chance: Foxand Bergdahl never had a chance: Fox
viewers and hosts alike generally love soldiers, but Bergdahl just didn't fitviewers and hosts alike generally love soldiers, but Bergdahl just didn't fit
the mold. He was an independent thinker who dared to question his insanethe mold. He was an independent thinker who dared to question his insane
circumstances – in the eyes of Fox, that's traitorous in andcircumstances – in the eyes of Fox, that's traitorous in and
of itself.of itself.
Now, as theNow, as the
White House tries to control the message by trotting out military officials of itsWhite House tries to control the message by trotting out military officials of its
own, all of Fox'sown, all of Fox's
favorite friends seem to be colliding at once: Hillary Clinton's book isfavorite friends seem to be colliding at once: Hillary Clinton's book is
raising new questions about Obamacare, Benghazi and Bergdahl ... who still dominated Fox's primetime shows on Monday. ("That is our focus tonight," Hannity said.) As for the militia-loving, whiteraising new questions about Obamacare, Benghazi and Bergdahl ... who still dominated Fox's primetime shows on Monday. ("That is our focus tonight," Hannity said.) As for the militia-loving, white
supremacist disciples of Cliven Bundy, whose shooting spree can arguably be traced supremacist disciples of Cliven Bundy, whose alleged shooting spree can arguably be traced
to Fox's doorstep? I think the bookers are mostly going to leave that oneto Fox's doorstep? I think the bookers are mostly going to leave that one
alone.alone.