This article is from the source 'nytimes' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/07/world/asia/bomb-hits-convoy-with-afghan-presidential-candidate-abdullah-abdullah.html

The article has changed 10 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 1 Version 2
Bomb Hits Convoy With Afghan Presidential Candidate Bomb Hits Convoy With Afghan Presidential Candidate
(about 4 hours later)
KABUL, Afghanistan — Eight days before Afghans are to vote for a new president, a suicide bombing took aim Friday at a leading candidate in what appeared to be the first direct attack on a presidential contender since campaigning began in January, Afghan officials said. The candidate, Abdullah Abdullah, escaped unharmed but initial reports indicated that at least four people were killed. KABUL, Afghanistan — A suicide bombing on Friday struck a convoy of vehicles carrying one of the candidates in Afghanistan’s presidential runoff election next week. The candidate, Abdullah Abdullah, escaped unharmed, but at least six other people were killed.
The attack took place shortly after noon as Dr. Abdullah was traveling between campaign events at hotels in Kabul, said Sediq Sediqqi, a spokesman for the Interior Ministry. The police were still trying to figure out exactly what happened, but it appeared that there were at least two blasts in close succession aimed at Dr. Abdullah’s convoy. Mr. Sediqqi said the first was caused by a suicide bomber, but the authorities were still trying to figure out if the second explosion was caused by a bomb hidden on the road or a magnetic explosive attached to a car. It appeared to be the first direct attack on a presidential contender since the campaign began in January, Afghan officials said.
Mr. Sediqqi said at least four bystanders were killed, but the authorities were still compiling a precise tally of casualties. Dr. Abdullah was traveling with Zalmay Rassoul, a former candidate who did not make it past the first round of voting in April. The Abdullah campaign said Dr. Rassoul was not harmed in the attack. The bombing took place shortly after noon, as Mr. Abdullah was traveling between campaign events at hotels in Kabul, said Sediq Sediqqi, a spokesman for the Interior Ministry. The police were still trying to figure out exactly what happened, but it appeared that there were at least two blasts in close succession aimed at Mr. Abdullah’s convoy. Mr. Sediqqi said the first explosion was caused by a suicide bomber, but the authorities were still trying to establish whether the second explosion was caused by a bomb hidden on the road or by a magnetic explosive attached to a car.
“We were together and a bomb hit our car. The car is destroyed,” Dr. Abdullah told supporters at a gathering shortly after the attack. “It didn’t hurt us but a number of my guards were wounded. The injuries aren’t serious. The second bomb also exploded. But the first bomb directly hit our car. God save us.” The Interior Ministry said in a statement that six people were known to have died in the attack. It identified the dead as “civilians”; other officials said at least one of Dr. Abdullah’s bodyguards was among the dead.
Dr. Abdullah got the most votes in the first round of balloting in April but did not capture enough support to avoid a runoff this month in his effort to replace President Hamid Karzai. Mr. Abdullah was traveling with Zalmay Rassoul, a candidate who did not make it past the first round of voting in April. The Abdullah campaign said Mr. Rassoul was not harmed in the attack.
In the month before the first round of voting, the Taliban launched several high-profile attacks, including separate suicide assaults on a voter registration center and the headquarters of Afghanistan’s election commission. “We were together, and a bomb hit our car; the car is destroyed,” Mr. Abdullah told supporters at a gathering shortly after the attack. “It didn’t hurt us, but a number of my guards were wounded. The injuries aren’t serious. The second bomb also exploded, but the first bomb directly hit our car. God save us.”
But the insurgents failed to disrupt the election, and there have been few major attacks directly on the campaigns in the two months since the first round of voting, though there have been reports of persistent violence against campaign offices and workers in far-flung parts of Afghanistan. Mr. Abdullah received the most votes in the first round of balloting in April, but not enough to avoid a runoff. He faces Ashraf Ghani, who received the second most votes, in the runoff election on June 14. The winner will succeed President Hamid Karzai in July. Both men are former ministers in Mr. Karzai’s government.
Still, it was widely expected that the Taliban would step up its effort to disrupt the second and final round of the election, in which Dr. Abdullah is facing Ashraf Ghani. Both men are former ministers in the government of President Karzai. There was no immediate claim of responsibility for the attack on Friday, but suspicion immediately fell on the Taliban and other insurgent groups in the country.
A deadly attack on a candidate could throw Afghanistan’s young democracy into a dangerous limbo. Under Afghan law, if a candidate is killed during the first or second round of campaigning or before assuming office, the entire election campaign must be conducted anew. The law was initially put in place to prevent losing candidates from trying to kill the winners so they could take the job that they had failed to win at the polls. The Taliban carried outseveral high-profile attacks in the month before the first round of voting, including separate suicide assaults on a voter registration center and the headquarters of Afghanistan’s election commission. But the insurgents failed to disrupt the election, and there have been relatively few major attacks on the campaigns since then, though there have been frequent reports of small-scale violence against campaign offices and workers in far-flung parts of the country.
But what happens if a candidate is killed between the first and second rounds is not clearly spelled out in the law, Afghan and Western officials said. The hope is that some sort of compromise would be reached, such as moving the third-place finisher from the first round into the second in order to avoid having to redo the entire election from the beginning, which would be a daunting challenge for Afghanistan and its Western backers. Still, it was widely expected that the Taliban would try to disrupt the runoff.
If insurgents were to succeed in killing one of the candidates, Afghanistan’s young democracy could be thrown into a dangerous limbo. Under Afghan law, if a candidate dies during the campaign or after winning but before assuming office, the entire election process must be repeated. That provision was originally intended to deter losing candidates from trying to kill the winners so they could take by default the post they failed to win at the polls.
But the law does not explain clearly what would happens if a candidate dies between the first and second rounds of voting, Afghan and Western officials said. The hope is that some sort of compromise would be reached, for example allowing the third-place finisher to contest the runoff in place of the candidate who died, rather than having to redo the election from the beginning, which would be a daunting challenge for Afghanistan and its Western backers.
The death of a candidate “is our worst nightmare,” said a Western diplomat, speaking earlier this year.The death of a candidate “is our worst nightmare,” said a Western diplomat, speaking earlier this year.
Starting the entire process over would likely cost more than $100 million, and it would mean months of uncertainty just as the NATO-led combat mission comes to an end and the number of American forces here shrinks to 9,800 by the start of next year. There are currently about 32,000 American service members in Afghanistan, down from about 100,000 a few years ago. Repeating the election process would probably cost more than $100 million and create months of political uncertainty, just as the NATO-led combat mission is winding down and the American force here, now numbering about 32,000 service members, is reduced to 9,800 by Dec. 31.