This article is from the source 'guardian' and was first published or seen on . It last changed over 40 days ago and won't be checked again for changes.

You can find the current article at its original source at http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/may/19/oregon-gay-marriage-legal-judge-strikes-ban

The article has changed 2 times. There is an RSS feed of changes available.

Version 0 Version 1
Oregon judge strikes down ban on same-sex marriages Oregon judge strikes down ban on same-sex marriages
(about 2 hours later)
A federal judge struck down Oregon's ban on same-sex marriage on Monday, clearing the way for couples to tie the knot immediately. A federal judge on Monday struck down a voter-approved ban on gay marriage in the north-western state of Oregon, saying it is unconstitutional, marking the 13th consecutive legal victory for gay marriage advocates since last year's US supreme court ruling that overturned part of a federal ban.
“Because Oregon’s marriage laws discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, the laws violate the Equal Protection Clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution,” US district court judge Michael McShane wrote. “Because Oregon’s marriage laws discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation, the laws violate the Equal Protection Clause of the fourteenth amendment to the United States constitution,” wrote US district court judge Michael McShane. He joined judges in seven other states who have struck down gay marriage bans this year, though appeals are underway and the issue is expected to settled by the US supreme court. He said the ban unconstitutionally discriminates against same-sex couples and ordered Oregon not to enforce it. State officials earlier refused to defend the constitutional ban in court.
State officials have said they'd be prepared to carry out same-sex marriages almost immediately, and couples lined up outside the county clerk's office in Portland in anticipation of the decision. The US supreme court last year struck down the 1996 Defense of Marriage Act, which barred the federal government from recognizing same-sex marriage. The court determined the law improperly deprived gay couples of due process. Many observers predicted the ruling would create a pathway for states to act, as polls showed a majority of Americans now support gay marriage. Indeed, lower-court judges have repeatedly cited that decision when striking down bans.
Four gay and lesbian couples brought suit arguing Oregon's marriage laws unconstitutionally discriminate against same-sex couples and exclude them from a fundamental right. In addition to Oregon, federal or state judges in Idaho, Oklahoma, Virginia, Michigan, Texas, Utah and Arkansas recently have found state same-sex marriage bans to be unconstitutional. Judges also have ordered Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee to recognize same-sex marriages from other states. At least 17 other states have filed lawsuits asking judges to throw out state bans.
The state refused to mount a defense of the voter-approved ban, and both sides asked that it be found unconstitutional. It's a reflection of a profound shift in both the legal landscape and US attitudes toward gay marriage in recent years. The two most recent states to make the unions legal were New Mexico and Hawaii, both of which did so in late 2013. Oregon's ruling is not expected to be challenged, which would make it the 18th state where gay marriage is legal.
Seventeen states and the District of Columbia allow gay marriage. Federal or state judges in Idaho, Oklahoma, Virginia, Michigan, Texas, Utah and Arkansas recently have found state same-sex marriage bans to be unconstitutional. Opposition remains stiff in many places. Critics note most states still do not allow gay marriage and that in most of those that do, it was the work of courts or legislatures, not the will of the people.
Judges also have ordered Kentucky, Ohio and Tennessee to recognize same-sex marriages from other states. In Oregon, state officials have said they'd be prepared to carry out same-sex marriages almost immediately, and couples lined up outside the county clerk's office in Portland in anticipation of the McShane's decision.
But opposition remains stiff in many places. Critics point out that most states still do not allow gay marriage and that in most that do, it was the work of courts or legislatures, not the people. Four gay and lesbian couples brought the Oregon cases, arguing the state's marriage laws unconstitutionally discriminate against them and exclude them from a fundamental right to marriage.
McShane last week denied a request by the National Organization for Marriage to defend Oregon's ban on behalf of its Oregon members. The organization requested an emergency stay of that decision on Monday morning, but a federal appeals court quickly denied it, clearing the way for same-sex marriages to begin immediately if McShane's ruling allows it. Democratic Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum refused to defend the ban, saying there are no legal arguments that could support it in light of decisions last year by the US supreme court. She sided with the couples, asking the judge to overturn the ban, and says she won't appeal.
Oregon law has long prohibited same-sex marriage, and only 10 years ago, voters added the ban to the state constitution The judge denied a request by the National Organization for Marriage to defend the law on behalf of its Oregonmembers. A panel of the ninth US circuit court of appeals on Monday refused the group's request for an emergency stay of that decision, allowing same-sex marriages to proceed.
Gay rights groups previously said they've collected enough signatures to force a statewide vote on gay marriage in November. But they said they would discard the signatures and drop their campaign if the court rules in their favor by 23 May.
Oregon law has long prohibited same-sex marriage, and voters added the ban to the state constitution in 2004. The decision, approved by 57% of voters, came months after Multnomah County, the state's largest, briefly issued marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
About 3,000 gay couples were allowed to marry before a judge halted the practice. The Oregon supreme court later invalidated the marriages.
A ruling from a federal appeals court is expected soon, either from a panel in Denver reviewing rulings from Utah and Oklahoma or judges in Virginia reviewing that state's case. Many legal observers say they expect the US supreme court to take a case at some point, but they acknowledge it's impossible to predict what the high court will do. The supreme court could also just wait and see how US appellate courts rule. It often waits until there is a conflict between appellate courts before taking a case.